Literature DB >> 28828143

Comparison of SeaWinds Backscatter Imaging Algorithms.

David G Long.   

Abstract

This paper compares the performance and tradeoffs of various backscatter imaging algorithms for the SeaWinds scatterometer when multiple passes over a target are available. Reconstruction methods are compared with conventional gridding algorithms. In particular, the performance and tradeoffs in conventional 'drop in the bucket' (DIB) gridding at the intrinsic sensor resolution are compared to high-spatial-resolution imaging algorithms such as fine-resolution DIB and the scatterometer image reconstruction (SIR) that generate enhanced-resolution backscatter images. Various options for each algorithm are explored, including considering both linear and dB computation. The effects of sampling density and reconstruction quality versus time are explored. Both simulated and actual data results are considered. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of high-resolution reconstruction using SIR as well as its limitations and the limitations of DIB and fDIB.

Keywords:  QuikSCAT; RapidScat; SeaWinds; backscatter; reconstruction; sampling; scatterometer; variable aperture

Year:  2016        PMID: 28828143      PMCID: PMC5562413          DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2626966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens        ISSN: 1939-1404            Impact factor:   3.784


  1 in total

1.  Optimum Image Formation for Spaceborne Microwave Radiometer Products.

Authors:  David G Long; Mary J Brodzik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 5.600

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Polar Applications of Spaceborne Scatterometers.

Authors:  David G Long
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.784

2.  A global urban microwave backscatter time series data set for 1993-2020 using ERS, QuikSCAT, and ASCAT data.

Authors:  Steve Frolking; Tom Milliman; Richa Mahtta; Aaron Paget; David G Long; Karen C Seto
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.