Recently, Patrick Micke and colleagues from Uppsala University have contributed an outstanding publication on the limitations to predict prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (Grinberg et al., 2017[6]). For this purpose the authors used two cohorts of 354 and 357 patients, respectively, that were analyzed by immunostaining. Moreover, genome wide expression data of 1779 non-small cell lung cancerpatients were included. Based on expression data and results from previous studies (Therneau, 2015[14]; Barlési et al., 2005[1]; Behrens et al., 2013[2]; Shiba et al., 2000[12]; Younes et al., 1997[15]) five proteins (MKI67, EZH2, SLC2A1, CADM1, and NKX2-1) were chosen for immunohistochemical analyses. As expected, each of the individual five selected proteins was significantly or borderline significantly associated with prognosis. Next, the authors studied the association of the combined five protein factors to clinicopathological data. Interestingly, the model based on protein expression alone did not outperform the model based only on the clinicopathological parameters (Grinberg et al., 2017[6]). Combining protein expression with clinicopathological data did not lead to a significantly improved accuracy of survival prediction.The authors discuss several possible reasons for the negative result, one of them that global gene expression profiles may have performed better. However, despite the availability of several non-small cell lung cancer cohorts with genome-wide data an improvement over clinicopathological parameters including performance status has not yet been demonstrated. A possible reason not discussed by the authors is that tumor tissue used for biomarker or genome-wide expression analysis was taken by surgery soon after diagnosis, while metastasis occurs usually years later. Eventually, biomarker expression undergoes changes during this period and the surgically obtained tumor tissue may no longer be sufficiently representative of the tumor that finally progresses and leads to death.Currently, numerous studies are performed in several tumor entities aimed to predict prognosis (Selinski et al., 2017[11]; Hellwig et al., 2016[8]; Djureinovic et al., 2016[4]; Lohr et al., 2015[10]; Ghallab, 2015[5]; Cadenas et al., 2014[3]; Lesjak et al., 2014[9]; Suda and Mitsudomi, 2015[13]; Hammad et al., 2016[7]). Of course, the result of Grinberg and colleagues is quite pessimistic for this field of research on molecular biomarkers for prognostication. It will be interesting, whether similar pessimistic results will be obtained also for other tumor entities in future or whether the limited value of protein biomarkers remains specific for non-small cell lung cancer.
Authors: M Shiba; H Kohno; K Kakizawa; T Iizasa; M Otsuji; Y Saitoh; K Hiroshima; H Ohwada; T Fujisawa Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dijana Djureinovic; Björn M Hallström; Masafumi Horie; Johanna Sofia Margareta Mattsson; Linnea La Fleur; Linn Fagerberg; Hans Brunnström; Cecilia Lindskog; Katrin Madjar; Jörg Rahnenführer; Simon Ekman; Elisabeth Ståhle; Hirsh Koyi; Eva Brandén; Karolina Edlund; Jan G Hengstler; Mats Lambe; Akira Saito; Johan Botling; Fredrik Pontén; Mathias Uhlén; Patrick Micke Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-07-07
Authors: Carmen Behrens; Luisa M Solis; Heather Lin; Ping Yuan; Ximing Tang; Humam Kadara; Erick Riquelme; Hector Galindo; Cesar A Moran; Neda Kalhor; Stephen G Swisher; George R Simon; David J Stewart; J Jack Lee; Ignacio I Wistuba Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marianna Grinberg; Dijana Djureinovic; Hans Rr Brunnström; Johanna Sm Mattsson; Karolina Edlund; Jan G Hengstler; Linnea La Fleur; Simon Ekman; Hirsh Koyi; Eva Branden; Elisabeth Ståhle; Karin Jirström; Derek K Tracy; Fredrik Pontén; Johan Botling; Jörg Rahnenführer; Patrick Micke Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Birte Hellwig; Katrin Madjar; Karolina Edlund; Rosemarie Marchan; Cristina Cadenas; Anne-Sophie Heimes; Katrin Almstedt; Antje Lebrecht; Isabel Sicking; Marco J Battista; Patrick Micke; Marcus Schmidt; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michaela S Lesjak; Rosemarie Marchan; Joanna D Stewart; Eugen Rempel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Cell Adh Migr Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 3.405