Literature DB >> 28827502

Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures.

David J Ciufo1, Douglas A Zaruta, Jason S Lipof, Kyle T Judd, John T Gorczyca, John P Ketz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variables: lateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority was female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months. INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade.
RESULTS: A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (P ≤ 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (>3 mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction >5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, and tip-apex distance >25 mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (P = 0.58) or fellowship training (P = 0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (Odds ratios [OR] = 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR = 4.3, CI, 1.3-14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR = 3.6, CI, 1.0-13.0) were associated with fixation cutout.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or nonmodifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (nonmodifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28827502     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  20 in total

Review 1.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

2.  A comprehensive 3D CT based classification of intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  R B Kalia; Shobha S Arora; Bhaskar Sarkar; Souvik Paul; Sukhmin Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell Ng; Nihar S Shah; Ivan Golub; Matthew Ciminero; Kevin Zhai; Kevin K Kang; Ahmed K Emara; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Trochanteric fixation nail advanced with helical blade and cement augmentation: early experience with a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-17

5.  Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Matt L Graves; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Hip Fractures: Relevant Anatomy, Classification, and Biomechanics of Fracture and Fixation.

Authors:  Young Lu; Harmeeth S Uppal
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-03

7.  [The migration of helical blade and the tip apex distance value in cephalomedullary nail for geriatric intertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  Haifeng Li; Hua Wang; Yingqi Zhang; Jiaqian Zhou; Feng Yuan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-15

8.  A novel cerclage wiring technique in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nails in young adults.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Yan-Jie Guo; Xin-Gang Yu; Yang Chen; Chen Chen; Nan-Ji Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nailing of a basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a mechanically compromised greater trochanter.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jun Hu; Xiang Li; Xiaodong Qin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A Comparative Study of Intramedullary Nail Strengthened with Auxiliary Locking Plate or Steel Wire in the Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Fracture of Femur.

Authors:  Zheng-Hao Wang; Kai-Nan Li; Hai Lan; Xiao-Dong Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.