Olga Theou1, Joanna M Blodgett2, Judith Godin2, Kenneth Rockwood2. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine (Theou, Godin, Rockwood), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (Blodgett), University College London, London, UK olga.theou@dal.ca. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine (Theou, Godin, Rockwood), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (Blodgett), University College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviours are associated with adverse health outcomes in middle-aged and older adults, even among those who exercise. We examined whether the degree of frailty affects the association between sedentary behaviours and higher risk of mortality. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we used data from 3141 community-dwelling adults 50 years of age or older from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 cohorts of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Time engaged in sedentary behaviours was measured using uniaxial accelerometers, and frailty was based on a 46-item frailty index. Mortality data were linked up to 2011. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: We found that for people with low levels of frailty (frailty index score ≤ 0.1), sedentary time was not predictive of mortality, regardless of physical activity level (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.15). Among people who were vulnerable (0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2) or frail (frailty index score > 0.2), sedentary time was associated with higher mortality only among those who were physically inactive (not meeting the criterion for moderate physical activity) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33 for the group defined by 0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2; HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46 for the group defined by 0.2 < frailty index score ≤ 0.3; HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.50 for frailty index score > 0.3). INTERPRETATION: The effect of sedentary behaviours on mortality varied by level of frailty. Adults with the highest frailty level experienced the greatest adverse impact. Low frailty levels (frailty index score ≤ 0.1) seemed to eliminate the increased risk of mortality associated with prolonged sitting, even among people who did not meet recommended physical activity guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviours are associated with adverse health outcomes in middle-aged and older adults, even among those who exercise. We examined whether the degree of frailty affects the association between sedentary behaviours and higher risk of mortality. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we used data from 3141 community-dwelling adults 50 years of age or older from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 cohorts of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Time engaged in sedentary behaviours was measured using uniaxial accelerometers, and frailty was based on a 46-item frailty index. Mortality data were linked up to 2011. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: We found that for people with low levels of frailty (frailty index score ≤ 0.1), sedentary time was not predictive of mortality, regardless of physical activity level (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.15). Among people who were vulnerable (0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2) or frail (frailty index score > 0.2), sedentary time was associated with higher mortality only among those who were physically inactive (not meeting the criterion for moderate physical activity) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33 for the group defined by 0.1 < frailty index score ≤ 0.2; HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46 for the group defined by 0.2 < frailty index score ≤ 0.3; HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.50 for frailty index score > 0.3). INTERPRETATION: The effect of sedentary behaviours on mortality varied by level of frailty. Adults with the highest frailty level experienced the greatest adverse impact. Low frailty levels (frailty index score ≤ 0.1) seemed to eliminate the increased risk of mortality associated with prolonged sitting, even among people who did not meet recommended physical activity guidelines.
Authors: Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Klaus Hauer; Clemens Becker; Marc Bonnefoy; Rachel A Nakash; Dawn A Skelton; Sarah E Lamb Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Tess J Harris; Christopher G Owen; Christina R Victor; Rika Adams; Ulf Ekelund; Derek G Cook Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Tatiana Y Warren; Vaughn Barry; Steven P Hooker; Xuemei Sui; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Ian Janssen; Donald H Paterson; Amy E Latimer; Ryan E Rhodes; Michelle E Kho; Audrey Hicks; Allana G Leblanc; Lori Zehr; Kelly Murumets; Mary Duggan Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Raildo da Silva Coqueiro; Bruno M de Queiroz; Daniela S Oliveira; Magno C das Merces; José A Oliveira Carneiro; Rafael Pereira; Marcos H Fernandes Journal: J Sports Med Phys Fitness Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Ezra I Fishman; Jeremy A Steeves; Vadim Zipunnikov; Annemarie Koster; David Berrigan; Tamara A Harris; Rachel Murphy Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Kenneth E Powell; John M Jakicic; Richard P Troiano; Katrina Piercy; Bethany Tennant Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Nada Almohaisen; Matthew Gittins; Chris Todd; Jana Sremanakova; Anne Marie Sowerbutts; Amal Aldossari; Asrar Almutairi; Debra Jones; Sorrel Burden Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Venicius Dantas da Silva; Sheilla Tribess; Joilson Meneguci; Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Douglas de Assis Teles Santos; José Ailton Oliveira Carneiro; Jair Sindra Virtuoso Júnior Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Peter Hanlon; Barbara I Nicholl; Bhautesh Dinesh Jani; Duncan Lee; Ross McQueenie; Frances S Mair Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2018-06-14