Sambit Sahoo1, Ivy N Haskins2, Li-Ching Huang3, David M Krpata2, Kathleen A Derwin1, Benjamin K Poulose4, Michael J Rosen5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. 2. Comprehensive Hernia Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 4. The Vanderbilt Hernia Center, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 5. Comprehensive Hernia Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: rosenm@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently introduced slow-resorbing biosynthetic and non-resorbing macroporous polypropylene meshes are being used in hernias with clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. However, information about the use of biosynthetic meshes and their outcomes compared with polypropylene meshes in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases is lacking. Here we evaluate the use of biosynthetic mesh and polypropylene mesh in elective open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) and investigate differences in early wound morbidity after OVHR within clean-contaminated and contaminated cases. STUDY DESIGN: All elective, OVHR with biosynthetic mesh or uncoated polypropylene mesh from January 2013 through October 2016 were identified within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Association of mesh type with 30-day wound events in clean-contaminated or contaminated wounds was investigated using a 1:3 propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: Biosynthetic meshes were used in 8.5% (175 of 2,051) of elective OVHR, with the majority (57.1%) used in low-risk or comorbid clean cases. Propensity-matched analysis in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases showed no significant difference between biosynthetic mesh and polypropylene mesh groups for 30-day surgical site occurrences (20.7% vs 16.7%; p = 0.49) or unplanned readmission (13.8% vs 9.8%; p = 0.4). However, surgical site infections (22.4% vs 10.9%; p = 0.03), surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (24.1% vs 13.2%; p = 0.049), and reoperation rates (13.8% vs 4.0%; p = 0.009) were significantly higher in the biosynthetic group. CONCLUSIONS: Biosynthetic mesh appears to have higher rates of 30-day wound morbidity compared with polypropylene mesh in elective OVHR with clean-contaminated or contaminated wounds. Additional post-market analysis is needed to provide evidence defining best mesh choices, location, and surgical technique for repairing contaminated ventral hernias.
BACKGROUND: Recently introduced slow-resorbing biosynthetic and non-resorbing macroporous polypropylene meshes are being used in hernias with clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. However, information about the use of biosynthetic meshes and their outcomes compared with polypropylene meshes in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases is lacking. Here we evaluate the use of biosynthetic mesh and polypropylene mesh in elective open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) and investigate differences in early wound morbidity after OVHR within clean-contaminated and contaminated cases. STUDY DESIGN: All elective, OVHR with biosynthetic mesh or uncoated polypropylene mesh from January 2013 through October 2016 were identified within the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Association of mesh type with 30-day wound events in clean-contaminated or contaminated wounds was investigated using a 1:3 propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: Biosynthetic meshes were used in 8.5% (175 of 2,051) of elective OVHR, with the majority (57.1%) used in low-risk or comorbid clean cases. Propensity-matched analysis in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases showed no significant difference between biosynthetic mesh and polypropylene mesh groups for 30-day surgical site occurrences (20.7% vs 16.7%; p = 0.49) or unplanned readmission (13.8% vs 9.8%; p = 0.4). However, surgical site infections (22.4% vs 10.9%; p = 0.03), surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (24.1% vs 13.2%; p = 0.049), and reoperation rates (13.8% vs 4.0%; p = 0.009) were significantly higher in the biosynthetic group. CONCLUSIONS: Biosynthetic mesh appears to have higher rates of 30-day wound morbidity compared with polypropylene mesh in elective OVHR with clean-contaminated or contaminated wounds. Additional post-market analysis is needed to provide evidence defining best mesh choices, location, and surgical technique for repairing contaminated ventral hernias.
Authors: M P Morris; J A Mellia; A N Christopher; M N Basta; V Patel; K Qiu; R B Broach; J P Fischer Journal: Hernia Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Sambit Sahoo; Jinjin Ma; Luciano Tastaldi; Andrew R Baker; Jacki Loftis; Michael J Rosen; Kathleen A Derwin Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: S Morales-Conde; P Hernández-Granados; L Tallón-Aguilar; M Verdaguer-Tremolosa; M López-Cano Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Joseph A Mellia; Sammy Othman; Hani I Naga; Charles A Messa; Omar Elfanagely; Yasmeen M Byrnes; Marten N Basta; John P Fischer Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-12-16
Authors: F Köckerling; N N Alam; S A Antoniou; I R Daniels; F Famiglietti; R H Fortelny; M M Heiss; F Kallinowski; I Kyle-Leinhase; F Mayer; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; S K Narang; A Petter-Puchner; W Reinpold; H Scheuerlein; M Smietanski; B Stechemesser; C Strey; G Woeste; N J Smart Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 4.739