Kate Louise M Mangona1, R Paul Guillerman2, Victor S Mangona3, Jennifer Carpenter4, Wei Zhang5, Monica Lopez6, Robert C Orth7. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas Medical Center (Clinical Care Tower, 470), 6701 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. Electronic address: katelouise.mangona@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas Medical Center (Clinical Care Tower, 470), 6701 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. Electronic address: rpguille@texaschildrens.org. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Texas children's hospital, Department of surgery, Division of pediatric surgery, Houston, Texas. 5. Texas Children's Hospital Outcomes & Impact Service, Houston, Texas. 6. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 7. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas Medical Center (Clinical Care Tower, 470), 6701 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: For imaging pediatric appendicitis, ultrasonography (US) is preferred because of its lack of ionizing radiation, but is limited by operator dependence. This study investigates the US diagnostic performance during night shifts covered by radiology trainees compared to day shifts covered by attending radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Appy-Scores (1 = completely visualized normal appendix; 2 = partially visualized normal appendix; 3 = nonvisualized appendix with no inflammatory changes in the expected region of the appendix; 4 = equivocal; 5a = nonperforated appendicitis; 5b = perforated appendicitis) from 2935 US examinations (2161:774, day-to-night) from July 2013 to 2014 were correlated with the intraoperative diagnoses and the clinical follow-up. The diagnostic performance of trainees and attendings was compared with Fisher exact test. Interobserver agreement was measured by Cohen kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Appendicitis prevalence was 25.3% (day) and 22.5% (night). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive vale were 94.0%, 93.7%, 93.8%, 97.9%, and 83.4% during the day and 92.0%, 91.2%, 91.3%, 97.5%, and 75.2% at night. Specificity (P = .048) and positive predictive value (P = .011) differed, with more false positives at night (7%) than during the day (4.7%). Trainee and attending agreement was high (k = 0.995), with Appy-Scores of 1, 4, and 5a most frequently discordant. CONCLUSIONS: US has a high diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement for pediatric appendicitis when interpreted by radiology trainees during night shifts or attending radiologists during day shifts. However, lower specificity and positive predictive value at night warrants a thorough trainee education to avoid false-positive examinations. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: For imaging pediatric appendicitis, ultrasonography (US) is preferred because of its lack of ionizing radiation, but is limited by operator dependence. This study investigates the US diagnostic performance during night shifts covered by radiology trainees compared to day shifts covered by attending radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Appy-Scores (1 = completely visualized normal appendix; 2 = partially visualized normal appendix; 3 = nonvisualized appendix with no inflammatory changes in the expected region of the appendix; 4 = equivocal; 5a = nonperforated appendicitis; 5b = perforated appendicitis) from 2935 US examinations (2161:774, day-to-night) from July 2013 to 2014 were correlated with the intraoperative diagnoses and the clinical follow-up. The diagnostic performance of trainees and attendings was compared with Fisher exact test. Interobserver agreement was measured by Cohen kappa coefficient. RESULTS:Appendicitis prevalence was 25.3% (day) and 22.5% (night). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive vale were 94.0%, 93.7%, 93.8%, 97.9%, and 83.4% during the day and 92.0%, 91.2%, 91.3%, 97.5%, and 75.2% at night. Specificity (P = .048) and positive predictive value (P = .011) differed, with more false positives at night (7%) than during the day (4.7%). Trainee and attending agreement was high (k = 0.995), with Appy-Scores of 1, 4, and 5a most frequently discordant. CONCLUSIONS: US has a high diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement for pediatric appendicitis when interpreted by radiology trainees during night shifts or attending radiologists during day shifts. However, lower specificity and positive predictive value at night warrants a thorough trainee education to avoid false-positive examinations. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Ubaidullah Khan; Murad Kitar; Imed Krichen; Kais Maazoun; Rasha Ali Althobaiti; Mostafa Khalif; Mohammad Adwani Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2018-12-18