Literature DB >> 28826113

National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom.

John W Redhead1, Linda May2, Tom H Oliver3, Perrine Hamel4, Richard Sharp4, James M Bullock3.   

Abstract

A wide variety of tools aim to support decision making by modelling, mapping and quantifying ecosystem services. If decisions are to be properly informed, the accuracy and potential limitations of these tools must be well understood. However, dedicated studies evaluating ecosystem service models against empirical data are rare, especially over large areas. In this paper, we report on the national-scale assessment of a new ecosystem service model for nutrient delivery and retention, the InVEST Nutrient Delivery Ratio model. For 36 river catchments across the UK, we modelled total catchment export of phosphorus (P) and/or nitrogen (N) and compared model outputs to measurements derived from empirical water chemistry data. The model performed well in terms of relative magnitude of nutrient export among catchments (best Spearman's rank correlation for N and P, respectively: 0.81 and 0.88). However, there was wide variation among catchments in the accuracy of the model, and absolute values of nutrient exports frequently showed high percentage differences between modelled and empirically-derived exports (best median absolute percentage difference for N and P, respectively: ±64%, ±44%). The model also showed a high degree of sensitivity to nutrient loads and hydrologic routing input parameters and these sensitivities varied among catchments. These results suggest that the InVEST model can provide valuable information on nutrient fluxes to decision makers, especially in terms of relative differences among catchments. However, caution is needed if using the absolute modelled values for decision-making. Our study also suggests particular attention should be paid to researching input nutrient loadings and retentions, and the selection of appropriate input data resolutions and threshold flow accumulation values. Our results also highlight how availability of empirical data can improve model calibration and performance assessment and reinforce the need to include such data in ecosystem service modelling studies.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem services; Eutrophication; Land cover; Nutrient delivery; River; Runoff

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826113     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the relationship between soil erosion and landscape metrics across Gorgan Watershed in northern Iran.

Authors:  Fazlolah Ahmadi Mirghaed; Bubak Souri; Marjan Mohammadzadeh; Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny; Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Spatio-temporal evolution of water-related ecosystem services: Taihu Basin, China.

Authors:  Junyu Chen; Tao Cui; Huimin Wang; Gang Liu; Mat Gilfedder; Yang Bai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Identifying Spatial Patterns and Ecosystem Service Delivery of Nature-Based Solutions.

Authors:  Paulina Guerrero; Dagmar Haase; Christian Albert
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.