Literature DB >> 28826035

Plans, preferences or going with the flow: An online exploration of women's views and experiences of birth plans.

Bernie Divall1, Helen Spiby2, Mary Nolan3, Pauline Slade4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's views of birth plans, and experiences of their completion and use.
DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive study, using Internet-mediated research methods.
SETTING: The discussion boards of two well-known, UK-based, online parenting forums, where a series of questions relating to birth plans were posted. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the selected parenting forums who had written and used, or who had chosen not to write or use, a birth plan.
FINDINGS: Women responded with a range of views and experiences relating to the completion and use of birth plans. The benefits of birth plans were described in terms of communication with healthcare professionals, potentially enhancing awareness of available options, and maintaining a sense of control during labour and birth. However, many respondents believed the idea of 'planning' birth was problematic, and described a reluctance to write a formal plan. The support of healthcare professionals, particularly midwives, was considered essential to the success of both writing and using birth plans. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show a continued debate among women on the benefits and challenges involved in writing and using birth plans, suggesting problems for a 'one size fits all' approach often seen in the use of birth plan templates. In the context of maternity policy supporting women's choice and personalised care, and as a way of acknowledging perceived problems of 'planning' for birth, a flexible approach to birth plans is required, including the consideration of employing alternative nomenclature. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Birth plans remain a point of contention in care contexts around the world. Midwives and other healthcare providers play a central role in supporting women to discuss available options, whether or not they decide to complete a formal birth plan.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth plans; choice; control; online research methods; preparation for labour

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826035     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT).

Authors:  Encarnación López-Gimeno; Gloria Seguranyes; Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Lucia Burgos Cubero; Griselda Vázquez Garreta; Gemma Falguera-Puig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Perinatal Nurses Respond to Shared Decision-Making Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Ashley Furr; Dana E Brackney; Rebecca L Turpin
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.

Authors:  Encarnación López-Gimeno; Gemma Falguera-Puig; Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Meritxell Angelet; Griselda Vázquez Garreta; Gloria Seguranyes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences.

Authors:  Rebecca Webb; Susan Ayers; Annick Bogaerts; Ljiljana Jeličić; Paulina Pawlicka; Sarah Van Haeken; Nazihah Uddin; Rita Borg Xuereb; Natalija Kolesnikova
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.