Literature DB >> 28825913

Global Trends in Family Planning Programs, 1999-2014.

Bernice Kuang1, Isabel Brodsky.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Since 1972, the Family Planning Effort Index has measured national family planning program activities in developing countries and provided a longitudinal perspective on a standardized set of program characteristics.
METHODS: In 2014, experts in 90 developing countries assessed national family planning program effort in four main component areas-policies, services, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, and access to methods-using a standardized questionnaire. Results were compared with previous years' data.
RESULTS: Globally, family planning program effort has progressed in all four main component areas. The service component, historically the weakest, was rated lowest of all components in 2014, at 47% of the maximum effort, despite a marked improvement of 7.6 percentage points since 1999. Policies, generally the strongest component, remained the strongest in 2014, with 55% of the maximum score and a 6.7 percentage-point improvement since 1999. Monitoring and evaluation improved the most, by 7.8 percentage points, from 45% to 53%, while access improved more modestly, by 2.7 points, from 49% to 52%. Family planning efforts were generally strongest in Asia and Oceania and generally weakest in Central Asia and Eastern Europe.
CONCLUSIONS: Global family planning programs have improved consistently over the last few decades, although there is room for further development in all regions.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28825913     DOI: 10.1363/42e0316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1944-0391


  5 in total

1.  Demographic and Fertility Characteristics of Contraceptive Clusters in Burundi.

Authors:  Kerry L D MacQuarrie; Courtney Allen; Alison Gemmill
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2021-10-09

2.  "Family planning in Rwanda is not seen as population control, but rather as a way to empower the people": examining Rwanda's success in family planning from the perspective of public and private stakeholders.

Authors:  Hilary M Schwandt; Seth Feinberg; Akrofi Akotiah; Tong Yuan Douville; Elliot V Gardner; Claudette Imbabazi; Erin McQuin; Maha Mohamed; Alexis Rugoyera; Diuedonné Musemakweli; Cliff Wes Nichols; Nelly Uwajeneza Nyangezi; Joshua Serrano Arizmendi; Doopashika Welikala; Benjamin Yamuragiye; Liliana Zigo
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-11-20

3.  Contraceptive Method Mix: Updates and Implications.

Authors:  Jane T Bertrand; John Ross; Tara M Sullivan; Karen Hardee; James D Shelton
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2020-12-23

4.  The aggregate effect of implementation strength of family planning programs on modern contraceptive use at the health systems level in rural Malawi.

Authors:  Anooj Pattnaik; Diwakar Mohan; Amy Tsui; Sam Chipokosa; Hans Katengeza; Jameson Ndawala; Melissa A Marx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Women's contraceptive profiles in Burundi: Knowledge, attitudes, and interactions with media and health services.

Authors:  Kerry L D MacQuarrie; Christina Juan; Alison Gemmill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.