Literature DB >> 28825501

Health-Related Disaster Communication and Social Media: Mixed-Method Systematic Review.

Stine Eckert1, Pradeep Sopory1, Ashleigh Day1, Lee Wilkins1, Donyale Padgett1, Julie Novak1, Jane Noyes2, Tomas Allen3, Nyka Alexander3, Marsha Vanderford3, Gaya Gamhewage3.   

Abstract

This mixed-method evidence synthesis drew on Cochrane methods and principles to systematically review literature published between 2003 and 2016 on the best social media practices to promote health protection and dispel misinformation during disasters. Seventy-nine studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods on risk communication during disasters in all UN-languages were reviewed, finding that agencies need to contextualize the use of social media for particular populations and crises. Social media are tools that still have not become routine practices in many governmental agencies regarding public health in the countries studied. Social media, especially Twitter and Facebook (and equivalents in countries such as China), need to be incorporated into daily operations of governmental agencies and implementing partners to build familiarity with them before health-related crises happen. This was especially observed in U.S. agencies, local government, and first responders but also for city governments and school administrations in Europe. For those that do use social media during health-related risk communication, studies find that public relations officers, governmental agencies, and the general public have used social media successfully to spread truthful information and to verify information to dispel rumors during disasters. Few studies focused on the recovery and preparation phases and on countries in the Southern hemisphere, except for Australia. The vast majority of studies did not analyze the demographics of social media users beyond their geographic location, their status of being inside/outside the disaster zone; and their frequency and content of posting. Socioeconomic demographics were not collected and/or analyzed to drill deeper into the implications of using social media to reach vulnerable populations. Who exactly is reached via social media campaigns and who needs to be reached with other means has remained an understudied area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825501     DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1351278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  9 in total

1.  Social presence for strategic health messages: An examination of state governments' use of Twitter to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Imran Mazid
Journal:  Public Relat Rev       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Characteristics of Misinformation Spreading on Social Media During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: A Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Kelin Chen; Yuni Luo; Anyang Hu; Ji Zhao; Liwei Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-05-10

3.  Ebola and Localized Blame on Social Media: Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Conversations During the 2014-2015 Ebola Epidemic.

Authors:  Melissa Roy; Nicolas Moreau; Cécile Rousseau; Arnaud Mercier; Andrew Wilson; Laëtitia Atlani-Duault
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03

Review 4.  Rapid review of virus risk communication interventions: Directions for COVID-19.

Authors:  Darren M Winograd; Cara L Fresquez; Madison Egli; Emily K Peterson; Alyssa R Lombardi; Allison Megale; Yajaira A Cabrera Tineo; Michael G Verile; Alison L Phillips; Jessica Y Breland; Susan Santos; Lisa M McAndrew
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-20

5.  Impact of information timeliness and richness on public engagement on social media during COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical investigation based on NLP and machine learning.

Authors:  Kai Li; Cheng Zhou; Xin Robert Luo; Jose Benitez; Qinyu Liao
Journal:  Decis Support Syst       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.969

6.  Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying.

Authors:  Tat-Huei Cham; Boon-Liat Cheng; Yoon-Heng Lee; Jun-Hwa Cheah
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 7.  Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento; Ana Beatriz Pizarro; Jussara M Almeida; Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; Marcos André Gonçalves; Maria Björklund; David Novillo-Ortiz
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 13.831

8.  Social media may hinder learning about science; social media's role in learning about COVID-19.

Authors:  Sangwon Lee; Edson C Tandoc; Edmund W J Lee
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2022-09-14

Review 9.  Communication vs evidence: What hinders the outreach of science during an infodemic? A narrative review.

Authors:  Epaminondas La Bella; Claire Allen; Flavio Lirussi
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2021-05-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.