| Literature DB >> 28825457 |
Qihui Zhou1,2, Olga Castañeda Ocampo3,4, Carlos F Guimarães1, Philipp T Kühn1,2, Theo G van Kooten1,2, Patrick van Rijn1,2,3.
Abstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) methods based on topography gradients or arrays have been extensively used to investigate cell-material interactions. However, it is a huge technological challenge to cost efficiently prepare topographical gradients of inorganic biomaterials due to their inherent material properties. Here, we developed a novel strategy translating PDMS-based wrinkled topography gradients with amplitudes from 49 to 2561 nm and wavelengths between 464 and 7121 nm to inorganic biomaterials (SiO2, Ti/TiO2, Cr/CrO3, and Al2O3) which are frequently used clinical materials. Optimal substratum conditions promoted human bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell alignment, elongation, cytoskeleton arrangement, filopodia development as well as cell adhesion in vitro, which depended both on topography and interface material. This study displays a positive correlation between cell alignment and the orientation of cytoskeleton, filopodia, and focal adhesions. This platform vastly minimizes the experimental efforts both for inorganic material interface engineering and cell biological assessments in a facile and effective approach. The practical application of the HTS technology is expected to aid in the acceleration of developments of inorganic clinical biomaterials.Entities:
Keywords: biomimetic surface; high-throughput screening; inorganic biomaterials; stem cell behavior; topographical gradient
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28825457 PMCID: PMC5609122 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b08237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ISSN: 1944-8244 Impact factor: 9.229
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the process to prepare wrinkled gradients with SiO2 via prolonged plasma oxidation and different metal oxide coatings by metal evaporation and exposure to air under ambient conditions.
Figure 2AFM images of topography (wrinkle) gradients with SiO2 and the different metal oxide coatings along the 1.0 cm PDMS substrate. Scale bars are 4 μm and apply to all images. Also shown are flat substrates obtained under the same conditions only without applying unidirectional strain.
Figure 3(A and B) Dependence of the wavelength and amplitude of created wrinkle gradients with different surface compositions. The 650s surfaces start where the 100s surfaces end with respect to wavelength and amplitude. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 30 wrinkles). (C) XPS spectra of wrinkle gradients with SiO2 and different metal oxide layers.
Figure 4Fluorescence microscopy images of slices of the gradients are shown representing the full length of the samples for the gradients (scale bars = 1 mm). The red color is for TRITC–phalloidin.
Figure 5Macroscopic response of cells toward surface gradients with different interface materials. (A) Surface coverage by cells. (B) Cell area. (C) Cell orientation. (D) Cell elongation. (n = ∼150 cells). * indicates that both groups are statistically different (p < 0.05). A0W0 (amplitude 0 nm; wavelength 0 nm).
Figure 6Highlighted focal adhesion contact points for hBM-MSCs after two days cultivation on wrinkle gradient surfaces with different interface biomaterials. Scale bars are 22 μm and apply to all images.
Figure 7Dependence of focal adhesion area per cell (A) and focal adhesion orientation (B) on wrinkle gradients with different interface materials, respectively. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = ∼100 cells). * indicates that both groups are statistically different (p < 0.05). A0W0 (amplitude 0 nm; wavelength 0 nm).