Literature DB >> 28825375

Single-center, retrospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin K antagonist in patients with cancer.

Elizabeth R Pritchard1, Jose R Murillo2, David Putney3, Eleanor C Hobaugh3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer patients is currently unclear. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the standard of care for cancer patients with venous thromboembolism, with warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, as an alternative. Clear recommendations do not exist for patients with both active cancer and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The objectives of this study were to report safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonist in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism or non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult cancer patients from 2012 to 2015 who received an antineoplastic agent and an anticoagulant.
RESULTS: A total of 258 patients were reviewed: 80 patients in direct oral anticoagulant group, 95 patients in low-molecular-weight heparin group, and 83 patients in vitamin K antagonist group. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on an anticoagulant for acute or chronic venous thromboembolism. Major bleeding events were similar across the groups (15% direct oral anticoagulant vs 17% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 18% vitamin K antagonist). The most common type of major bleeding event was gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of five fatal bleeding events occurred. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rates were higher in both direct oral anticoagulant (18%) and low-molecular-weight heparin (12%) groups while lower in vitamin K antagonist group (10%) compared to previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight heparin, or vitamin K antagonist had similar rates of major bleeding events, with gastrointestinal bleeding being the most common event. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rates were higher in direct oral anticoagulant and low-molecular-weight heparin groups than prior studies. Randomized trials are warranted to establish clear safety and efficacy in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct oral anticoagulants; cancer; enoxparin; hemorrhage; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825375     DOI: 10.1177/1078155217726158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  8 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the age of direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  C Ay; J Beyer-Westendorf; I Pabinger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Yifan Tong; Yuanyuan Deng; Le Zou; Shunhui Li; Hui Chen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Authors:  Xiaojun Song; Zhili Liu; Rong Zeng; Jiang Shao; Bao Liu; Yuehong Zheng; Changwei Liu; Wei Ye
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

4.  Comparison Between Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Asian Individuals With Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Dong-Yi Chen; Chi-Nan Tseng; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Wen-Ching Lan; Cheng-Keng Chuang; See-Tong Pang; Shao-Wei Chen; Tien-Hsing Chen; Shang-Hung Chang; I-Chang Hsieh; Pao-Hsien Chu; Ming-Shien Wen; Jen-Shi Chen; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Lai-Chu See; Wen-Kuan Huang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

5.  Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Yi-Dan Yan; Sheng-Yan Yang; Long Shen; Ling-Cong Kong; Chi Zhang; An-Hua Wei; Zheng Li; Xin-Hua Wang; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

6.  Evaluation of risk factors and assessment models for predicting venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Joanna Rupa-Matysek; Marta Lembicz; Eliza Katarzyna Rogowska; Lidia Gil; Mieczysław Komarnicki; Halina Batura-Gabryel
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Hypertension in malignancy-an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  Jolanta Małyszko; Maciej Małyszko; Leszek Kozlowski; Klaudia Kozlowska; Jacek Małyszko
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 8.  Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: current evidence.

Authors:  I García-Escobar; E Brozos-Vázquez; D Gutierrez Abad; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón; A J Muñoz Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.405

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.