Literature DB >> 28825183

Sample size determination for EQ-5D-5L value set studies.

Mihir Gandhi1,2,3, Ying Xu4, Nan Luo5, Yin Bun Cheung4,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) is a widely used health status instrument for cost-utility analysis of healthcare interventions. Recently, its 5-Level version (EQ-5D-5L) and a protocol for conducting valuation of its health states were developed. We propose four approaches for estimating the sample size for EQ-5D-5L valuation according to the standardized procedures of the protocol.
METHODS: The first approach is for estimating mean health state utility values with a desired precision level using a regression model. The second approach, empirical in nature, determines a sample size based on mean absolute error in predicting health state values using a large-scale reference study. The last two approaches are for assessing the significance of regression coefficients of health state descriptors and to estimate the regression coefficients with a desired precision for predicting health state utility values.
RESULTS: Using data from a Singaporean study, we estimated parameters that are useful for sample size determination, including the design effect. Each of the approaches was illustrated with examples and pragmatic recommendations were provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Capitalizing on the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol, we proposed four sample size estimation approaches which can help to decide an appropriate sample size for a value set study.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825183     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1685-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  15 in total

1.  A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies.

Authors:  L M Lamers; J McDonnell; P F M Stalmeier; P F M Krabbe; J J V Busschbach
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.

Authors:  Mark Oppe; Nancy J Devlin; Ben van Hout; Paul F M Krabbe; Frank de Charro
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states in Singapore: modeling of time trade-off values for 80 empirically observed health states.

Authors:  Nan Luo; Pei Wang; Julian Thumboo; Yee-Wei Lim; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Authors:  M Herdman; C Gudex; A Lloyd; Mf Janssen; P Kind; D Parkin; G Bonsel; X Badia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07

7.  EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Oppe; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Koonal Shah; Juan M Ramos-Goñi; Nan Luo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review.

Authors:  Silvia Coretti; Matteo Ruggeri; Paul McNamee
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Tim P Morris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference.

Authors:  Claire M Nolan; Louise Longworth; Joanne Lord; Jane L Canavan; Sarah E Jones; Samantha S C Kon; William D-C Man
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  How is quality of life defined and assessed in published research?

Authors:  Daniel S J Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Claudia Rutherford; Margaret-Ann Tait; Madeleine T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?

Authors:  Bram Roudijk; A Rogier T Donders; Peep F M Stalmeier
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Health-related quality of life among COVID-19 individuals: A cross-sectional study in Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Suganya Barani; Tarun Bhatnagar; Meenakumari Natarajan; Kumari Gayathri; Harshal Bhimrao Sonekar; Akhil Sasidharan; T S Selvavinayagam; Bhavani Shankara Bagepally
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2022-01-03

4.  Sample Size and Model Prediction Accuracy in EQ-5D-5L Valuations Studies: Expected Out-of-Sample Accuracy Based on Resampling with Different Sample Sizes and Alternative Model Specifications.

Authors:  Tonya Moen Hansen; Knut Stavem; Kim Rand
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2022-03-07

5.  The Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) tool: a new method for valuing health states.

Authors:  Paul P Schneider; Ben van Hout; Marike Heisen; John Brazier; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-01-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.