| Literature DB >> 28825036 |
Juan Jose Larrañaga1, Pedro Ignacio Picco2, Alejandro Yanzon2, Marcelo Figari2.
Abstract
Background Melanoma resection creates important soft tissues defects, which are difficult to manage when located on the weight-bearing heel and mid foot. There is little evidence on the use of the reverse-flow sural flap for this type of reconstruction. Objective This study reports our case series on the reconstructive management of the hind and mid-foot defects after melanoma resection using the reverse sural artery flap. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of four consecutive patients treated with resection of melanoma of the feet and reconstruction with reverse sural artery flap from 2006 to 2009. Results The mean age of the patients was 54 years, three were females, and one was male. Three of the defects were located on the weight-bearing heel, the other on the mid-foot dorsum. The melanomas were fully resected with wide margins. Three patients were reconstructed primarily, whereas one patient was reconstructed 4 weeks after the resective surgery. This series revealed 100% flap survival and there was no partial necrosis. Major complications were not observed. The four patients completely recovered the function of the affected limb. Conclusion The reverse sural flap is a viable option for the reconstruction of foot defects after melanoma resection.Entities:
Keywords: foot melanoma; heel reconstruction; neurocutaneous flap; reverse sural flap; sural flap
Year: 2017 PMID: 28825036 PMCID: PMC5553511 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg J (N Y) ISSN: 2378-5128
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | Case 1 | Case2 | Case 3 | Case 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 52 | 44 | 69 | 45 |
| Comorbidities | Diabetes | Smoking | Diabetes Hypertension | Smoking |
| Location of melanoma | Instep | Heel | Heel | Heel |
| Breslow (mm) | 8 | In situ | 2.19 | 5.6 |
| Clark | IV | III | IV | |
| Resection margin (cm) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Time of reconstruction | Primary | Secondary | Primary | Primary |
| Donor-site closure | Primary closure | Primary closure | Secondary closure | Skin graft |
| Sentinel node biopsy | Positive | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Secondary inguinal dissection | Yes | No | No | No |
| Complications | Cellulitis of the thigh | – | – | – |
| Follow-up (mo) | 74 | 86 | 64 | 60 |
| Recurrence/metastasis | Yes | No | No | No |
Fig. 1The flap design.
Fig. 2Flap raising (skin covered pedicled).
Fig. 3The final position of the flap.
Fig. 4Heel melanoma.
Fig. 5Tunelized flap.
Fig. 6Postoperative appearance after 1 month of surgery.