| Literature DB >> 28824554 |
Moacyr Araujo1,2, Carlos Noriega1,2, Gbekpo Aubains Hounsou-Gbo1,2,3, Doris Veleda1,2, Julia Araujo1, Leonardo Bruto1,2, Fernando Feitosa1, Manuel Flores-Montes1, Nathalie Lefèvre4, Pedro Melo1, Amanda Otsuka1, Keyla Travassos1, Ralf Schwamborn1, Sigrid Neumann-Leitão1.
Abstract
The Amazon generates the world's largest offshore river plume, which covers extensive areas of the tropical Atlantic. The data and samples in this study were obtained during the oceanographic cruise Camadas Finas III in October 2012 along the Amazon River-Ocean Continuum (AROC). The cruise occurred during boreal autumn, when the river plume reaches its maximum eastward extent. In this study, we examine the links between physics, biogeochemistry and plankton community structure along the AROC. Hydrographic results showed very different conditions, ranging from shallow well-mixed coastal waters to offshore areas, where low salinity Amazonian waters mix with open ocean waters. Nutrients, mainly [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], were highly depleted in coastal regions, and the magnitude of primary production was greater than that of respiration (negative apparent oxygen utilization). In terms of phytoplankton groups, diatoms dominated the region from the river mouth to the edge of the area affected by the North Brazil Current (NBC) retroflection (with chlorophyll a concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 0.94 mg m-3). The North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) region, east of retroflection, is fully oligotrophic and the most representative groups are Cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. Additionally, in this region, blooms of cyanophyte species were associated with diatoms and Mesozooplankton (copepods). A total of 178 zooplankton taxa were observed in this area, with Copepoda being the most diverse and abundant group. Two different zooplankton communities were identified: a low-diversity, high-abundance coastal community and a high-diversity, low-abundance oceanic community offshore. The CO2 fugacity (fCO2sw), calculated from total alkalinity (1,450 < TA < 2,394 μmol kg-1) and dissolved inorganic carbon (1,303 < DIC < 2,062 μmol kg-1) measurements, confirms that the Amazon River plume is a sink of atmospheric CO2 in areas with salinities <35 psu, whereas, in regions with salinities >35 and higher-intensity winds, the CO2 flux is reversed. Lower fCO2sw values were observed in the NECC area. The ΔfCO2 in this region was less than 5 μatm (-0.3 mmol m-2 d-1), while the ΔfCO2 in the coastal region was approximately 50 μatm (+3.7 mmol m-2 d-1). During the cruise, heterotrophic and autotrophic processes were observed and are indicative of the influences of terrestrial material and biological activity, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Amazon River-Ocean Continuum; Camadas Finas III; biogeochemistry; carbon cycle; plankton communities; tropical Atlantic
Year: 2017 PMID: 28824554 PMCID: PMC5534475 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1(A) Positions of the 24 stations sampled along the ship track during the Camadas Finas III (CF3) cruise; (B) Sea surface currents (cm s−1) and Chl-a (mg m−3) in October 2012; (C) SST for the same period, obtained from Objectively Analyzed air-sea Fluxes (OAflux); (D) Monthly Amazon River discharge (m3 s−1) in October 2012 and climatology (1982–2012); (E) Monthly precipitation data sets (mm h−1); and (F) SSS for October 2012 derived from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS).
Figure 2Distribution of (A) SST; (B) SSS; and (C) σ-t along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012.
Figure 3Distributions of (A) Ammonia; (B) Nitrite; (C) Nitrate; (D) Phosphate; and (E) Silicate along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012.
Figure 4Distributions of (A) Dissolved oxygen (DO); (B) Saturation of DO (%); and (C) Apparent oxygen utilization (AOU) along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012.
Figure 5Distributions of (A) Total alkalinity (TA); and (B) Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012.
Figure 6Distributions of (A) fCO2sw; (B) fCO2atm; and (C) Calculated CO2 fluxes along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012. The circle and star symbols in 6C indicate negative and positive values, respectively.
Figure 7Distributions of (A) Phytoplankton groups; (B) Diversity and Chl-a; (C) Zooplankton groups; (D) Vertical biomass of zooplankton; and (E) Neuston biomass along the ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012. The most representative species of each group (phytoplankton and zooplankton) are shown in vertical orientation in (A,C), respectively. The location of the species in the figure indicates the region of most representative of them.
Figure 8(A) Clustering diagram (G1 = group 1, in red color; G2 = group 2, in blue color; G3 = group 3, in brown color and G4 = group 4, in green color); (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) with all variables found along the full ship track during the CF3 cruise, October 2012; and (C) PCA with biological groups in the offshore NECC region. The acronyms correspond to those specified in Table 1 for PCA analysis.
Loading factors of the 5 principal components (PCA analysis).
| 0.16 | −0.08 | −0.04 | 0.15 | ||
| 0.19 | −0.11 | −0.04 | 0.15 | ||
| 0.07 | −0.09 | 0.02 | 0.11 | ||
| −0.58 | 0.13 | 0.35 | −0.21 | ||
| σ | 0.07 | −0.10 | −0.02 | 0.14 | |
| −0.33 | 0.07 | 0.32 | 0.15 | ||
| −0.04 | −0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||
| 0.52 | −0.16 | −0.20 | 0.25 | ||
| − | −0.33 | −0.30 | −0.21 | 0.40 | |
| − | −0.45 | −0.37 | −0.06 | 0.36 | |
| − | −0.40 | −0.28 | −0.06 | 0.02 | |
| − | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.04 | |
| − | −0.39 | −0.03 | 0.44 | −0.05 | |
| −0.29 | 0.17 | −0.12 | 0.05 | ||
| 0.31 | − | 0.32 | −0.19 | −0.26 | |
| −0.38 | − | −0.22 | −0.05 | −0.11 | |
| 0.08 | − | 0.50 | −0.01 | 0.46 | |
| 0.16 | − | 0.49 | −0.07 | 0.27 | |
| 0.05 | − | 0.43 | −0.18 | −0.13 | |
| 0.05 | − | −0.05 | −0.65 | −0.08 | |
| 0.25 | − | −0.39 | 0.29 | −0.09 | |
| 0.50 | − | 0.13 | 0.35 | −0.24 | |
| −0.20 | 0.43 | −0.31 | 0.08 | ||
| −0.18 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.31 | ||
| −0.38 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| −0.20 | −0.39 | −0.30 | 0.19 | 0.63 |
The shading corresponds to factor 1 (positive-blue and negative-red). The following values correspond to factor 2 (positive-purple and negative-yellow), factor 3 (positive-green), factor 4 (positive-brown) and factor 5 (positive-cyan). The values in bold indicate a significant correlation.
DINxs and N* values along the ship track during the Camadas Finas III (CF3) cruise.
| 1 | −0.62 | 2.28 |
| 2 | −0.04 | 2.86 |
| 3 | 2.73 | 5.63 |
| 4 | 0.41 | 3.31 |
| 5 | −1.03 | 1.87 |
| 6 | −0.95 | 1.95 |
| 7 | −0.34 | 2.56 |
| 8 | −1.91 | 0.99 |
| 9 | 0.04 | 2.94 |
| 10 | 0.10 | 3.00 |
| 11 | −1.71 | 1.19 |
| 12 | 0.08 | 2.98 |
| 13 | −0.28 | 2.62 |
| 14 | −0.75 | 2.15 |
| 15 | −1.92 | 0.98 |
| 16 | −0.80 | 2.10 |
| 17 | 0.42 | 3.32 |
| 18 | 1.81 | 4.71 |
| 19 | −0.57 | 2.33 |
| 20 | −0.65 | 2.25 |
| 21 | 0.13 | 3.03 |
| 22 | 0.02 | 2.92 |
| 23 | −1.09 | 1.81 |
| 24 | 1.08 | 3.98 |