Literature DB >> 28824241

A Combined Ultrasonographic and Conventional Radiographic Assessment of Hemophilic Arthropathy.

So-Won Chung1, Young-Jae Seo1, Chur Woo You2, Tong-Jin Chun3, Kang-Jae Jung1, Jae-Hyung Kim1.   

Abstract

Hemophilic arthropathy (HA) can be diagnosed by a number of imaging studies. However, it is difficult with conventional radiography to find soft tissue structures around joints, and ultrasonography has limited effectiveness in evaluating internal bony structures. We attempt to determine whether a combination of ultrasonography for soft tissue around joints and conventional radiography for bony structures can be used as a cost-effective imaging tool for evaluating HA and whether it reflects the functional status of hemophilic patients. Thirty-six males (median age 16.5 years; severe 34, mild 2) with hemophilia were recruited. We evaluated the severity of HA using combined imaging score that consisted of modified Petterson X-ray score (mPXS) and the modified ultrasonographic score (mUS). Joint impairment was clinically assesses using the World Federation of Hemophilia-Physical Examination (WFH-PE) scale and the Hemophilic joint health score (HJHS). We assessed the Hemophilia activities list (HAL) for the functional level. We performed a comparative analysis between the combined imaging score and the joint impairment scores as well as the functional scores. The mean mUS was 4.97 ± 3.99 points, and the mean mPXS was 2.85 ± 2.91 points; the combined imaging score was 7.83 ± 6.31 points. The combined imaging score was significantly correlated with the HJHS (p = 0.006) and WFH-PE scores (p = 0.019) as well as the HAL score (p = 0.002). A combination of conventional radiological and ultrasongraphic study might ultimately impact the optimal evaluation of joint impairment and functional status in hemophilic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthropathy; Function; Hemophilia; Musculoskeletal; Radiography; Ultrasonography

Year:  2016        PMID: 28824241      PMCID: PMC5544627          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-016-0717-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  30 in total

1.  Can ultrasonography improve on radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis of the hands? A comparison between radiographic and ultrasonographic detected pathology.

Authors:  H I Keen; R J Wakefield; A J Grainger; E M A Hensor; P Emery; P G Conaghan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Comparative study of validity of clinical, X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging scores in evaluation and management of haemophilic arthropathy in children.

Authors:  H Pergantou; G Matsinos; A Papadopoulos; H Platokouki; S Aronis
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Prophylaxis: musculoskeletal evaluation.

Authors:  M S Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.851

4.  Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia: a new performance-based instrument to measure disability.

Authors:  P M Poonnoose; C Manigandan; R Thomas; N K Shyamkumar; M L Kavitha; S Bhattacharji; A Srivastava
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Esperanza Naredo; Manuel Rodríguez; Cristina Campos; José Manuel Rodríguez-Heredia; Julio A Medina; Emilio Giner; Olga Martínez; Francisco Javier Toyos; Teresa Ruíz; Inmaculada Ros; Manuel Pujol; Xavier Miquel; Luz García; Juan José Aznar; Eugenio Chamizo; Manuel Páez; Pilar Morales; Amalia Rueda; Roser Tuneu; Hector Corominas; Juan José de Agustín; Carmen Moragues; Dolores Mínguez; Alfredo Willisch; Isabel González-Cruz; Angel Aragón; Gerardo Iglesias; Carlos Armas; Juan Pablo Valdazo; Carmen Vargas; Jaime Calvo-Alén; Antonio Juan-Mas; Georgina Salvador; Angels Puigdollers; Eva Galíndez; Noemi Garrido; José Salaberri; Enrique Raya; Meritxell Salles; César Díaz; José Luis Cuadra; Jesús Garrido
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-04-15

6.  Psychometric analysis of the Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH).

Authors:  P M Poonnoose; R Thomas; S N Keshava; R S Cherian; S Padankatti; D Pazani; M L Kavitha; M Devadarasini; S Bhattacharji; A Viswabandya; J A John; A S Macaden; V Mathews; A Srivastava
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.287

7.  The effectiveness of tools for monitoring hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  Yesim Oymak; Aysen T Yildirim; Yontem Yaman; Muge Gurcinar; Altinay Firat; Duygu Cubuckcu; Ozgur Carti; Gulcihan Ozek; Raziye C Vergin
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.289

8.  Hemophilic arthropathy of shoulder joints: clinical, radiographic, and ultrasonographic characteristics of seventy patients.

Authors:  Yeu-Chin Chen; Liang-Cheng Chen; Shin-Nan Cheng; Ru-Yu Pan; Shin-Tsu Chang; Tsung-Ying Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems.

Authors:  Nenad Kostanjsek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Optimal management of hemophilic arthropathy and hematomas.

Authors:  Sébastien Lobet; Cedric Hermans; Catherine Lambert
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2014-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.