| Literature DB >> 28824202 |
Tomasz Majchrzak1, Martyna Lubinska1, Anna Różańska1, Tomasz Dymerski1, Jacek Gębicki2, Jacek Namieśnik1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Oil blending is often used to enhance the properties of vegetable oils. The admixture of a more thermally stable oil makes the resulting blend more suitable for use in frying. A new method of quality assessment of vegetable oils used in frying is presented in this paper. In this method, ultra-fast gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector and chemometrics is employed. Principal component analysis was used for data processing. The results obtained with this method were compared with the results of the Rancimat test and sensory evaluation. It is demonstrated that the addition of olive oil improves the stability of rapeseed oil, and also changes its flavour and aroma profile. In addition, it was found that ultra-fast GC coupled with chemometrics is an effective tool for the assessment of the quality of edible oils. The proposed method does not require sample preparation, and the total time of analysis is less than 2 min.Entities:
Keywords: Food control; Gas chromatography; Lipids; Oxidations; Vegetable oil
Year: 2017 PMID: 28824202 PMCID: PMC5541118 DOI: 10.1007/s00706-017-1968-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Monatsh Chem ISSN: 0026-9247 Impact factor: 1.451
The results of Rancimat test and sensory analysis for canola, olive and blended oil incubated at five different temperatures for 24 h
| Parameter | Incubation temperature ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 60 | 100 | 140 | 180 | |
| Canola oil | |||||
| | 4.80 ± 0.38 | 0.080 ± 0.019 | 0.0333 ± 0.0077 | 0.0367 ± 0.017 | 0.0267 ± 0.0038 |
| Palatability | 3.50 ± 0.13 | 3.222 ± 0.059 | 1.833 ± 0.096 | 1.600 ± 0.093 | 1.222 ± 0.059 |
| Flavour description | None, nutty, grassy | None, nutty, grassy | Grassy, rancid | Grassy, rancid | Grassy, rancid, acidic |
| Smell description | None, grassy | None, grassy | Grassy, rancid | Grassy, rancid | Grassy, rancid, earthy |
| Olive oil | |||||
| | 7.64 ± 0.82 | 7.08 ± 0.93 | 3.33 ± 0.28 | 0.0267 ± 0.0038 | 0.0300 ± 0.0067 |
| Palatability | 3.40 ± 0.11 | 3.78 ± 0.13 | 2.00 ± 0.11 | 1.636 ± 0.090 | 1.454 ± 0.070 |
| Flavour description | None, grassy | Bittter, grassy, nutty | Bittter, grassy, nutty | Bittter, grassy, rancid | Bittter, grassy, rancid |
| Smell description | None, grassy | None, grassy | Grassy, acidic, earthy | Grassy, rancid | Grassy, rancid, earthy |
| Blended oil | |||||
| | 4.717 ± 0.156 | 4.533 ± 0.295 | 0.0350 ± 0.0047 | 0.0267 ± 0,0038 | 0.0267 ± 0.0038 |
| Palatability | 3.333 ± 0.104 | 3.538 ± 0.103 | 2.417 ± 0.089 | 1.538 ± 0.104 | 1.333 ± 0.066 |
| Flavour description | None, grassy | Grassy, nutty | Grassy, nutty | Grassy, nutty, rancid | Rancid, nutty, bitter |
| Smell description | None, grassy | None, grassy, acidic | Grassy, acidic | Grassy, rancid, earthy | Rancid, bitter, earthy |
aInduction time (Rancimat test result)
Fig. 1Chromatographic fingerprints of canola oil, olive oil, and blended oil samples incubated for 24 h at 20 and 180 °C
Fig. 2Classification of canola, olive, and blended oil incubating at five different temperatures at 24 h using PCA
Ultra-fast GC-FID parameters used in the research
| Autosampler | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation time/s | Incubation temperature/°C | Syringe temperature/°C | Flushing time/s | Agitation speed/rpm | |
| 1200 | 40 | 100 | 90 | 500 | |