Evaluation of the Edrophonium Challenge Test for Cervical Dystonia.

Objective To examine whether or not an edrophonium challenge test is useful for diagnosing cervical dystonia. Patients We evaluated 10 patients with cervical dystonia and 10 with hemifacial spasms (disease controls). We administered edrophonium and saline in this double-blinded study. Before and after the injection, we recorded the participants' clinical signs using a video camera to assess the objective symptoms every two minutes. Ten minutes after the saline and edrophonium injections, participants evaluated their subjective clinical signs using a visual analog scale. The objective signs on the video recordings were scored by specialists who were blinded to the treatment. The mean visual analog scale scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for paired continuous variables. Results The clinical signs of participants with cervical dystonia were amplified by edrophonium. In contrast, the clinical signs in participants with hemifacial spasms were not affected by the edrophonium challenge test. Conclusion The edrophonium challenge test may be useful for diagnosing cervical dystonia.

Introduction

Dystonia is a clinical syndrome characterized by sustained muscle contractions that cause twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures (1). The classification of dystonia has developed with increasing knowledge, and different schemes have been suggested, including the age at onset, body distribution, and etiology as the main differentiating factors (2). The most frequent phenotype in primary dystonia is adult-onset focal dystonia. Furthermore, the most frequent phenotypes in primary adult onset focal dystonia is blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, and hand dystonia (3). As few autopsies are performed, the pathology and pathophysiology of primary dystonia are unknown, except for hereditary dystonia, such as DYT3 dystonia (4). According to an electrophysiological study, sensory-motor mismatch in the central nervous system (CNS) is suggested as the cause (5). Dystonia is typically diagnosed by excluding any secondary diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders, as specific tests for dystonia are currently unavailable.

Balash and Giladi concluded that high doses of trihexyphenidyl (an anticholinergic agent) are effective, especially for treating segmental and generalized dystonia in young patients (6). It has been reported that anticholinergic agents improve the symptoms of dystonia; however, if involuntary movement of the neck is caused by cervical dystonia, then the symptoms may be made more apparent by a cholinergic agent.

Edrophonium chloride is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor with a rapid onset (approximately 30 seconds) and short duration (approximately 5 minutes). The suppression of dysfunctional eyelid closure by administering edrophonium is used to diagnose myasthenia gravis (MG) (7). Edrophonium is hydrophilic, with a limited capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier. In addition, edrophonium is rapidly excreted by the kidneys, suggesting limited direct efficacy in the CNS (8-10). However, in our study, blepharospasm was amplified after administering edrophonium, which suggests that edrophonium may be useful for diagnosing dystonia (11).

In the present study, we examined whether or not an edrophonium challenge test was useful for diagnosing cervical dystonia. We hypothesized that edrophonium chloride, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, might make the symptoms of cervical dystonia more apparent. To investigate our hypothesis, we examined the clinical symptoms of 10 patients with cervical dystonia after administering edrophonium injections. We also administered physiological saline as a control and examined patients with hemifacial spasms as a disease control.

Materials and Methods

Participants

This study included 10 patients with cervical dystonia (7 men and 3 women; age range, 34-73 years) and 10 with hemifacial spasms (control group: 4 men and 6 women; age range, 46-78 years) (Table 1). Cervical dystonia was clinically diagnosed according to the definition by Fahn (12). All participants were examined by a single movement disorder specialist (S.M.) who performed general physical and neurological examinations, laboratory tests, and brain magnetic resonance imaging to exclude other causes of dystonia, including birth injury and head trauma. Patients with a history of heart disease and arrhythmia were excluded from participating in the study for their safety. All subjects underwent a 12-lead electrocardiography examination and a chest radiography examination before the study was performed to exclude those with a cardiac disease. In this study, there was no special provision for treatment before the trial commenced.

All participants with cervical dystonia had a Tsui scale score of more than 6, and we only included subjects with moderate and severe symptoms, as mild symptoms could not be determined by videos (described later) that documented their clinical symptoms. The degree of severity in patients with hemifacial spasm was determined based on their symptoms, which were confirmed by the videos.

This investigation was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Shinko Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was registered with an International Committee of Medical Journal Editors-recognized registry, the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (number: UMIN000022557).

Administration of edrophonium and the evaluation of subjective symptoms

This was a double-blind study, as the participants and evaluators were blinded to the identity of the drug (saline or edrophonium). The protocol used for the edrophonium challenge test is shown in Table 2. We explained to the participants that we would administer two kinds of drugs among three types that might improve their symptoms, not change their symptoms, or worsen their symptoms. First, we intravenously injected saline (10 mL). Before and after the injection, we recorded the participants' clinical symptoms with a video camera (EX-S600; Casio, Tokyo, Japan) to assess the objective signs every 2 minutes (each video was 1 minute long). Ten minutes after the saline injection, participants evaluated their subjective clinical signs using a visual analog scale (VAS) (13). We explained to the participants that the left end of the scale indicated the worst possible state, whereas the right end indicated a healthy state without cervical dystonia or hemifacial spasm. To evaluate the participants' symptoms after administration, we also explained that 50 mm on the VAS indicated their symptoms before administration. Second, we administered edrophonium (10 mg in 9 mL of saline) and recorded the clinical signs as described above. Participants were directed to self-evaluate their clinical signs separately from any side effects.

Table 2.

Protocol for administering the edrophonium challenge test in participants with movement disorders

Evaluation of participants’ symptoms

1. Videotape (1 min) recording of the objective symptoms before the injection

2. Normal saline injection

3. Two min after the injection: videotape recording

4. Four min after the injection: videotape recording

5. Six min after the injection: videotape recording

6. Eight min after the injection: videotape recording

7. Ten min after the injection: videotape recording

8. Visual analog scale (VAS) test (evaluation after the normal saline injection)

9. Edrophonium injection

10. Two min after the injection: videotape recording

11. Four min after the injection: videotape recording

12. Six min after the injection: videotape recording

13. Eight min after the injection: videotape recording

14. Ten min after the injection: videotape recording

15. VAS test (evaluation after the edrophonium injection)

Evaluation of the video by three movement disorder specialists

1. We chose videos of the isotonic sodium chloride solution and edrophonium injections, which were randomly referred to as A and B, respectively

2. We chose the video acquired 8 min after the administration of A or B, because the symptoms changed the most about 8 min after the edrophonium administration

3. The video before the injection was reviewed

4. The video after the injection of A was reviewed

5. The modified VAS assessment was performed (the value after the A injection compared to that before the injection was used as the midline)

6. The video before the injection of B was reviewed

7. The video after the injection of B was reviewed

8. The modified VAS assessment was performed (the value after the B injection compared to that before the injection was used as the midline)

We evaluated videos before and after the injection of A or B as a set.

We randomly presented the videos before and after the injection of A or B of cervical dystonia, hand dystonia, and hemifacial spasm to the specialists.

Evaluation of objective symptoms

Three movement disorder specialists (N.M., H.K., and M.T.) who were blinded to the treatment and purpose of the examination independently evaluated the objective symptoms from the videos after administering saline and edrophonium, which were randomly named A and B. In the pilot study, we found that the symptoms changed the most about 8 minutes after edrophonium was administered. Therefore, we chose to evaluate the 1-minute videos acquired at 8 minutes after the administration. We presented the videos before and after the injection of A or B as a set. We randomly presented these sets of videos for cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasm to the specialists.

We used a modified VAS (mVAS) to evaluate the objective clinical signs. We used the mVAS to evaluate the objective signs of blepharospasm in a previous study and found that the objective signs of blepharospasm were amplified by the administration of edrophonium (11). The mVAS, the pre-administration baseline, was set at 50 mm (midline); the amelioration and exacerbation of symptoms were indicated by lower and higher numbers on the mVAS, respectively.

The final mVAS scores for the control and drug for each participant were the sum of each specialist's score. The VAS and mVAS scores were measured from the right side, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms. Using the subjective score estimated with the VAS and the objective score estimated using the mVAS, we evaluated the change in symptoms in the patients with cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasm equally.

Statistical analyses

The mean VAS and mVAS scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for paired continuous variables. We calculated the relative value as follows: the VAS score after the edrophonium injection - the VAS score after the saline injection. The relative values were also compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for paired continuous variables. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software (version 11.0 for Windows; IBM, Armonk, USA).

Results

The VAS scores of the subjective clinical signs and the mVAS scores of the objective clinical signs are presented in Figs. 1, 2. Involuntary movements became obvious 4-8 minutes after edrophonium was injected. In participants with cervical dystonia, the VAS scores for the subjective signs and the mVAS scores for the objective signs were significantly higher after edrophonium was injected than after saline was injected (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Mean and SD values of the VAS and mVAS for placebo and edrophonium injections for cervical dystonia. SD: standard deviation, VAS: visual analog scale, mVAS: modified visual analog scale, *p indicates the difference in the VAS score between injections.

Figure 2.

Mean and SD values of the VAS and mVAS for placebo and edrophonium injections for hemifacial spasm. SD: standard deviation, VAS: visual analog scale, mVAS: modified visual analog scale, *p indicates the difference in the VAS score between injections.

In participants with hemifacial spasms, no statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS and mVAS scores in the edrophonium injection and placebo groups (Fig. 2). The relative values were significantly higher in participants with cervical dystonia than in those with hemifacial spasms (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Mean and SD of the relative values for hemifacial spasm and cervical dystonia. SD: standard deviation, mVAS: modified visual analog scale, VAS: visual analog scale, *p indicates the difference in the VAS score between injections.

No severe muscarinic side effects such as bronchospasm or bradycardia were observed in this study. Typical muscarinic side effects (e.g. increased sweating, lacrimation, salivation, nausea, and diarrhea) were observed in all participants with cervical dystonia within the first minute. These side effects did not always appear when edrophonium was administered to participants with hemifacial spasms.

Discussion

The subjective and objective clinical signs of cervical dystonia were amplified by the administration of edrophonium; in contrast, the clinical signs of hemifacial spasm were not affected by the administration of edrophonium. Unlike the participants with hemifacial spasm, typical muscarinic side effects (e.g. increased sweating, lacrimation, and salivation) were observed in all participants with cervical dystonia within the first minute. It has been reported that dystonia is caused by a mismatch between motor and sensory signals. The strong reaction to edrophonium and the typical side effects observed following edrophonium administration may therefore be characteristics of dystonia. Cervical dystonia became obvious 4-8 minutes after the edrophonium injection. The primary feature of the edrophonium challenge test for cervical dystonia was a slow reaction time, unlike the edrophonium challenge test for MG. We also found that the subjective and objective relative values were significantly higher for cervical dystonia than for hemifacial spasm. Therefore, comparing the symptoms at the time of saline injection may result in a more accurate diagnosis.

In the clinical setting, cervical dystonia is typically diagnosed by excluding any secondary diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders, as specific tests for dystonia are unavailable. It has been reported that dystonia can occur with a peripheral nerve injury, after radiation therapy, and with congenital diseases (14-16). A differential diagnosis is supposed to be quite easy, made by observing the symptoms; however, clinically, it is difficult to completely exclude secondary diseases. If there is a history of secondary diseases or mental illness, making an objective diagnosis of primary dystonia is particularly difficult. In patients with complicated symptoms of dystonia (e.g. a muscle disease or congenital inflammatory peripheral disease as the underlying disease as well as abnormal neck posture), we cannot distinguish the cause of primary dystonia. For example, the occurrence of head drop is difficult to diagnose, because it is due to abnormal muscle contraction, weakness of the posterior neck muscles, a skeletal problem, or psychosomatic factor. In such cases, we need a test to aid in the diagnosis dystonia (17,18).

We performed the edrophonium challenge test in several patients with a combination of MG and dystonia. We noticed that, unlike for MG, the edrophonium challenge test response to dystonia was delayed by 7-8 minutes. Our double-blind study was designed with an observation time of 20 minutes. However, in routine practice, a long-term edrophonium challenge test is difficult to perform. Therefore, the protocol was designed so that, in all cases, physiological saline was administered first and edrophonium second, and the observation time was 10 minutes.

Multiple forms of dystonia are associated with genetic mutations, but the pathogenesis of sporadic dystonia is usually unclear. Abnormal plasticity in the basal ganglia (BG) is believed to be important to the disease etiology, and acetylcholine is a critical neuromodulator in the BG (19). As for why the reaction time to the edrophonium challenge test for cervical dystonia was slow, there are two possible sites of action for edrophonium: the CNS, including the BG, and the peripheral nerves (20).

It has been reported that edrophonium mitigates allodynia in an animal model of neuropathic pain, suggesting changes in afferent fiber transmission to the spinal cord that could in turn alter central sensorimotor integration (21). The effects of edrophonium on the neuromuscular junction and autonomic ganglia have been studied, but those on the CNS have not been studied. In the current study, dystonia became obvious 4-8 minutes after the edrophonium injection was administered, whereas the symptoms of MG improved within 1 minute. This delay suggests that the effects of edrophonium on cervical dystonia are centrally mediated by changes in afferent input.

We did not observe changes in the symptoms of participants with hemifacial spasm. There is now considerable evidence that primary hemifacial spasms are associated with vascular compression of the facial nerve at its root exit zone from the brainstem in almost all cases (22). Cholinesterase inhibitors have been shown to improve the symptoms in patients with neuromuscular junction disorders, but they do not affect peripheral nerve diseases. Therefore, for patients with hemifacial spasms, it was predicted that the symptoms would not change, which is not contradictory to our findings.

In cases of cervical dystonia, anticholinergic agent therapy can be effective or ineffective (23). The obvious symptoms induced by edrophonium are indirect proof that anticholinergic drugs are effective in patients who are responders to edrophonium. Further research is needed to establish whether or not the patients in whom the symptoms are exacerbated by edrophonium respond to anticholinergic agents.

In MG, the administration of edrophonium induces acetylcholine release, which subsequently improves the symptoms. Thus, the edrophonium challenge test has been established as a diagnostic tool for MG (7), and the safety of the edrophonium challenge test has been discussed (24). In our study, we performed a 12-lead electrocardiography examination and chest radiography before the study in all subjects to exclude the presence of cardiac disease, and no serious muscarinic side effects, such as bronchospasm and bradycardia, were observed. In Japan, physicians use edrophonium under electrocardiographic monitoring, and sulfuric acid atropine is used if a side effect of edrophonium (e.g. bradykinesia, abdominal pain, and salivation) is severe; thus, no severe side effects have been reported.

The Choi score is used as a scale for cervical dystonia (25). However, it is unsuitable for evaluating the delicate changes in cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasms after edrophonium is injected; we therefore used the mVAS for the evaluations. In addition, the Choi score is unsuitable for assessing cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasm. We used the mVAS to evaluate blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm before and after edrophonium was injected, and we found that the clinical signs of blepharospasm became obvious. Therefore, we determined that using the mVAS to perform the evaluations is appropriate.

In conclusion, our findings showed that the edrophonium challenge test is helpful for diagnosing cervical dystonia. Using the edrophonium challenge test can help reduce the rate of misdiagnoses and improve treatment efficacy. However, because of the small sample size and the fact that we did not randomize the order of the saline and edrophonium treatments, independent replication of this study with a larger sample size and treatment randomization is warranted.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Click here for additional data file.

Click here for additional data file.

A) Clinical characteristics of participants with cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasms
	No. of participants (women)	Mean age (SD)	Age of onset (SD)
Cervical dystonia	10 (3)	49.8 (13.3)	45.3 (16.4)
Hemifacial spasms	10 (6)	65.3 (9.1)	59.0 (11.5)

SD: standard deviation

B) Profile of patients with cervical dystonia
Patient no.	Sex	Symptoms	Age (years)	Age of onset (years)	Tsui score
1	Male	Lt rotation, posterior flexion	37	29	8
2	Female	Rt rotation, anterior flexion	40	30	9
3	Male	Lt rotation, anterior flexion	34	30	8
4	Female	Rt rotaion, anterior flexion	45	36	8
5	Male	Lt flexion, shoulder elevation	42	37	7
6	Male	Rt flexion, shoulder elevation	44	42	7
7	Male	Lt rotation	56	53	6
8	Male	Rt rotation, anterior flexion	65	55	8
9	Male	Rt rotaion, anterior flexion	62	64	8
10	Female	Lt rotation	73	77	6

SD: standard deviation, Lt: left, Rt: right