Literature DB >> 28823676

Differential Phase Arrangement of Cellular Clocks along the Tonotopic Axis of the Mouse Cochlea Ex Vivo.

Jung-Sub Park1, Christopher R Cederroth2, Vasiliki Basinou2, Lara Sweetapple2, Renate Buijink3, Gabriella B Lundkvist4, Stephan Michel3, Barbara Canlon5.   

Abstract

Topological distributions of individual cellular clocks have not been demonstrated in peripheral organs. The cochlea displays circadian patterns of core clock gene expression [1, 2]. PER2 protein is expressed in the hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons of the cochlea in the spiral ganglion neurons [1]. To investigate the topological organization of cellular oscillators in the cochlea, we recorded circadian rhythms from mouse cochlear explants using highly sensitive real-time tracking of PER2::LUC bioluminescence. Here, we show cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillations originating from hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Multi-phased cellular clocks were arranged along the length of the cochlea with oscillations initiating at the apex (low-frequency region) and traveling toward the base (high-frequency region). Phase differences of 3 hr were found between cellular oscillators in the apical and middle regions and from isolated individual cochlear regions, indicating that cellular networks organize the rhythms along the tonotopic axis. This is the first demonstration of a spatiotemporal arrangement of circadian clocks at the cellular level in a peripheral organ. Cochlear rhythms were disrupted in the presence of either voltage-gated potassium channel blocker (TEA) or extracellular calcium chelator (BAPTA), demonstrating that multiple types of ion channels contribute to the maintenance of coherent rhythms. In contrast, preventing action potentials with tetrodotoxin (TTX) or interfering with cell-to-cell communication the broad-spectrum gap junction blocker (CBX [carbenoxolone]) had no influence on cochlear rhythms. These findings highlight a dynamic regulation and longitudinal distribution of cellular clocks in the cochlea.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Period 2; auditory; bioluminescence imaging; cellular oscillators; circadian rhythm; cochlea; ion channels; spiral ganglion neurons; synchrony; tonotopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28823676      PMCID: PMC6899219          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  42 in total

Review 1.  Challenging the omnipotence of the suprachiasmatic timekeeper: are circadian oscillators present throughout the mammalian brain?

Authors:  Clare Guilding; Hugh D Piggins
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Distribution of Ca2+-activated K+ channel isoforms along the tonotopic gradient of the chicken's cochlea.

Authors:  K P Rosenblatt; Z P Sun; S Heller; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Membrane Currents, Gene Expression, and Circadian Clocks.

Authors:  Charles N Allen; Michael N Nitabach; Christopher S Colwell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Identification of a Circadian Clock in the Inferior Colliculus and Its Dysregulation by Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Jung-Sub Park; Christopher R Cederroth; Vasiliki Basinou; Inna Meltser; Gabriella Lundkvist; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Afferent synaptic transmission in a hair cell organ: pharmacological and physiological analysis of the role of the extended refractory period.

Authors:  Rosie Dawkins; William F Sewell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The Retina and Other Light-sensitive Ocular Clocks.

Authors:  Joseph C Besharse; Douglas G McMahon
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  Differential response of Period 1 expression within the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Wataru Nakamura; Shin Yamazaki; Nana N Takasu; Kazuo Mishima; Gene D Block
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  Slice preparation, organotypic tissue culturing and luciferase recording of clock gene activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Sergey A Savelyev; Karin C Larsson; Anne-Sofie Johansson; Gabriella B S Lundkvist
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Yoo; Shin Yamazaki; Phillip L Lowrey; Kazuhiro Shimomura; Caroline H Ko; Ethan D Buhr; Sandra M Siepka; Hee-Kyung Hong; Won Jun Oh; Ook Joon Yoo; Michael Menaker; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Calcium entry into stereocilia drives adaptation of the mechanoelectrical transducer current of mammalian cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  Laura F Corns; Stuart L Johnson; Corné J Kros; Walter Marcotti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Communicating clocks shape circadian homeostasis.

Authors:  Kevin B Koronowski; Paolo Sassone-Corsi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Circadian Regulation of Cochlear Sensitivity to Noise by Circulating Glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Christopher R Cederroth; Jung-Sub Park; Vasiliki Basinou; Benjamin D Weger; Evangelia Tserga; Heela Sarlus; Anna K Magnusson; Nadir Kadri; Frédéric Gachon; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Tonotopy in calcium homeostasis and vulnerability of cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  Robert Fettiplace; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Circadian integration of inflammation and glucocorticoid actions: Implications for the cochlea.

Authors:  Heela Sarlus; Jacopo Maria Fontana; Evangelia Tserga; Inna Meltser; Christopher R Cederroth; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Circadian vulnerability of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in the cochlea.

Authors:  Evangelia Tserga; Rocio Moreno-Paublete; Heela Sarlus; Erik Björn; Eduardo Guimaraes; Christian Göritz; Christopher R Cederroth; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Constant Light Dysregulates Cochlear Circadian Clock and Exacerbates Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Chao-Hui Yang; Chung-Feng Hwang; Jiin-Haur Chuang; Wei-Shiung Lian; Feng-Sheng Wang; Ethan I Huang; Ming-Yu Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.