Literature DB >> 28823629

Clinical Metabolomics to Segregate Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase Deficiency From Drug-Induced Metabolite Elevations.

Kirk L Pappan1, Adam D Kennedy1, Pilar L Magoulas2, Neil A Hanchard2, Qin Sun2, Sarah H Elsea3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phenotyping technologies featured in the diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism, such as organic acid, amino acid, and acylcarnitine analyses, recently have been supplemented by broad-scale untargeted metabolomic phenotyping. We investigated the analyte changes associated with aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency and dopamine medication treatment.
METHODS: Using an untargeted metabolomics platform, we analyzed ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma specimens, and biomarkers were identified by comparing the biochemical profile of individual patient samples to a pediatric-centric population cohort.
RESULTS: Elevated 3-methoxytyrosine (average z score 5.88) accompanied by significant decreases of dopamine 3-O-sulfate (-2.77), vanillylmandelate (-2.87), and 3-methoxytyramine sulfate (-1.44) were associated with AADC deficiency in three samples from two patients. In five non-AADC patients treated with carbidopa-levodopa, levels of 3-methoxytyrosine were elevated (7.65); however, the samples from non-AADC patients treated with DOPA-elevating drugs had normal or elevated levels of metabolites downstream of aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase, including dopamine 3-O-sulfate (2.92), vanillylmandelate (0.33), and 3-methoxytyramine sulfate (5.07). In one example, a plasma metabolomic phenotype pointed to a probable AADC deficiency and prompted the evaluation of whole exome sequencing data, identifying homozygosity for a known pathogenic variant, whereas whole exome analysis in a second patient revealed compound heterozygosity for two variants of unknown significance.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the power of combining broad-scale genotyping and phenotyping technologies to diagnose inherited neurometabolic disorders and suggest that metabolic phenotyping of plasma can be used to identify AADC deficiency and to distinguish it from non-AADC patients with elevated 3-methoxytyrosine caused by DOPA-raising medications.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aromatic amino acid decarboxylase deficiency; biochemistry; diagnosis; dopamine; inborn error of metabolism; metabolomics; neurotransmitter; phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28823629     DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Neurol        ISSN: 0887-8994            Impact factor:   3.372


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of the effects of repeated freeze thawing and extended bench top processing of plasma samples using untargeted metabolomics.

Authors:  Kelli Goodman; Matthew Mitchell; Anne M Evans; Luke A D Miller; Lisa Ford; Bryan Wittmann; Adam D Kennedy; Douglas Toal
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Clinical diagnosis of metabolic disorders using untargeted metabolomic profiling and disease-specific networks learned from profiling data.

Authors:  Lillian R Thistlethwaite; Xiqi Li; Lindsay C Burrage; Kevin Riehle; Joseph G Hacia; Nancy Braverman; Michael F Wangler; Marcus J Miller; Sarah H Elsea; Aleksandar Milosavljevic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Inborn Errors of Metabolism in the Era of Untargeted Metabolomics and Lipidomics.

Authors:  Israa T Ismail; Megan R Showalter; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-10-21

Review 4.  Integration of genomics and metabolomics for prioritization of rare disease variants: a 2018 literature review.

Authors:  Emma Graham; Jessica Lee; Magda Price; Maja Tarailo-Graovac; Allison Matthews; Udo Engelke; Jeffrey Tang; Leo A J Kluijtmans; Ron A Wevers; Wyeth W Wasserman; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Sara Mostafavi
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.982

5.  Next-generation metabolic screening: targeted and untargeted metabolomics for the diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism in individual patients.

Authors:  Karlien L M Coene; Leo A J Kluijtmans; Ed van der Heeft; Udo F H Engelke; Siebolt de Boer; Brechtje Hoegen; Hanneke J T Kwast; Maartje van de Vorst; Marleen C D G Huigen; Irene M L W Keularts; Michiel F Schreuder; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Saskia B Wortmann; Maaike C de Vries; Mirian C H Janssen; Christian Gilissen; Jasper Engel; Ron A Wevers
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Comparison of Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling vs Traditional Metabolic Screening to Identify Inborn Errors of Metabolism.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Jing Xiao; Charul Gijavanekar; Kirk L Pappan; Kevin E Glinton; Brian J Shayota; Adam D Kennedy; Qin Sun; V Reid Sutton; Sarah H Elsea
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.