Bradley Schoch1, Justin Wong2, Joseph Abboud2, Mark Lazarus2, Charles Getz2, Matthew Ramsey3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: matthew.ramsey@rothmaninstitue.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a treatment option for end-stage arthritis in low-demand patients willing to accept the limitations of TEA. Concern remains regarding the longevity of TEA implants, especially in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the failure rate and complication profile of TEA performed in patients aged less than 50 years. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2013, 11 linked TEAs were performed in patients aged less than 50 years (mean age, 37 years; range, 22-47 years). Outcome measures included pain; range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; Mayo Elbow Performance scores; complications; and reoperations. Elbows were observed for a minimum of 2 years or until mechanical failure. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: At follow-up, 82% of TEAs had experienced a complication. Six elbows sustained mechanical failures (5 had ulnar loosening and one had humeral loosening). Pain improved from 8.0 to 4.9. Extension improved from 34° to 22° and flexion increased from 113° to 128°. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score for surviving implants at follow-up was 42.9 (range, 17.5-56.7). Mayo Elbow Performance scores for surviving implants were rated as excellent (2), good (1), and fair (2). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of early mechanical failure, predominately ulnar loosening, were observed in TEA in patients aged less than 50 years. Surgeons should remain cautious in performing TEA in young patients who can be expected to use the TEA in a more demanding fashion, placing them at higher risk for mechanical failure. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.
PURPOSE:Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a treatment option for end-stage arthritis in low-demand patients willing to accept the limitations of TEA. Concern remains regarding the longevity of TEA implants, especially in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the failure rate and complication profile of TEA performed in patients aged less than 50 years. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2013, 11 linked TEAs were performed in patients aged less than 50 years (mean age, 37 years; range, 22-47 years). Outcome measures included pain; range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; Mayo Elbow Performance scores; complications; and reoperations. Elbows were observed for a minimum of 2 years or until mechanical failure. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: At follow-up, 82% of TEAs had experienced a complication. Six elbows sustained mechanical failures (5 had ulnar loosening and one had humeral loosening). Pain improved from 8.0 to 4.9. Extension improved from 34° to 22° and flexion increased from 113° to 128°. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score for surviving implants at follow-up was 42.9 (range, 17.5-56.7). Mayo Elbow Performance scores for surviving implants were rated as excellent (2), good (1), and fair (2). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of early mechanical failure, predominately ulnar loosening, were observed in TEA in patients aged less than 50 years. Surgeons should remain cautious in performing TEA in young patients who can be expected to use the TEA in a more demanding fashion, placing them at higher risk for mechanical failure. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.
Authors: Vasileios Samdanis; Gopikanthan Manoharan; Robert W Jordan; Adam C Watts; Paul Jenkins; Rohit Kulkarni; Michael Thomas; Amar Rangan; Stuart M Hay Journal: Shoulder Elbow Date: 2019-09-12