| Literature DB >> 28823060 |
Weixue Wang1, Xiang Li2, Congna Tian1, Shihua Zhao3, Marcus Hacker2, Xiaoli Zhang4,5.
Abstract
(1) To evaluate the prognostic value of LV remodeling parameters in patients with LV aneurysm by gated SPECT (GSPECT), gated PET (GPET) and CMR; (2) to evaluate the impact of myocardial viability and LV remodeling on the long-term cardiac survival in patients with LV aneurysm. One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients underwent GPET, GSPECT and CMR within two weeks, with a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 1.5 years. End-diastolic volume (EDV, mL) and end-systolic volume (ESV, mL) measured by GPET, GSPECT and CMR and corrected for BSA; EDVI and ESVI were calculated. Patients were divided into three groups by aneurysmal viability [mismatch score (MMS) of aneurysm ≥2.0] and LV remodeling (ESVI by GPET > 60 mL/m2). Group 1 (Viability -, LV remodeling -); Group 2 (Viability -, LV remodeling +) and Group 3 (Viability +, LV remodeling -/+). ESVI by GPET, MMS of aneurysm and summed rest score of aneurysm by multivariate regression analysis; as well as ESVI by GPET (HR 1.024, 95% CI 1.011-1.037, p = .0004), MMS of aneurysm (HR 1.284, 95% CI 1.051-1.577, p = .015) by interaction analysis were approved being independent predictors for cardiac death (p < .05). The long-term cardiac survival was significantly improved by revascularization in comparison with medical therapy in Group3 (p < .01), but did not significantly differ between Groups 1 and 2. ESVI by GPET showed a significant positive predictive value for cardiac death. Patients with viable myocardial aneurysm were most likely at increased risk for cardiac death and coronary revascularization was significantly associated with improved long-term cardiac survival. In contrast, the long-term cardiac survival of patients without LV remodeling and without aneurysmal viability was promising and, thus, could be treated by medical therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysm viability; Left ventricular remodeling; Long-term survival; PET/CT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28823060 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1234-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357