| Literature DB >> 28822893 |
Noha M Al-Qattan1, Mohammad M Al-Qattan2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: "On-top" and "side-to-side" plasties are techniques used for treating thumb duplications in which one thumb is adequate proximally and the other thumb contains a better pulp and nail distally. The detailed functional results of these techniques have not been reported in the literature. We report on two cases. PRESENTATION OF CASES: The first case had Wassel type VI duplication. The ulnar duplicate had a functioning interphalangeal joint and the radial duplicate had a functioning carpometacarpal joint. "On-top" plasty was done by putting the distal part of the ulnar duplicate on top of the proximal part of the radial duplicate. At 10 years after surgery, the outcome was excellent both cosmetically and functionally. In the second case (Wassel type VII with a zigzag deformity), the radial duplicate had a hypoplastic distal phalanx with no nail. The ulnar duplicate had a functioning interphalangeal joint and the radial duplicate had a functioning carpometacarpal joint. "Side-to-side" plasty was done by joining both thumbs side-to-side at the level of the proximal phalanx. At 3 years after surgery, the outcome we considered acceptable cosmetically and excellent functionally. DISCUSSION: We could not find similar cases in the literature with detailed long-term postoperative results.Entities:
Keywords: Thumb polydactyly; Thumb-sharing; ‘On-top plasty’; ‘Side-to-side plasty’
Year: 2017 PMID: 28822893 PMCID: PMC5565777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.07.060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2210-2612
Methods of surgical correction of thumb duplication.
| METHOD | INDICATION/DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| A. Simple excision of one duplicate | This is done if one of the duplicates is floating or severely hypoplastic; which is simply excised |
| B. Thumb-sharing procedures: | |
| 1. Reconstruction | This is indicated in duplications with unequal size/function. The better thumb is completely retained and is reconstructed with techniques such as collateral ligament, intrinsic muscle re-attachments, extrinsic tendon re-insertions and soft tissue augmentation from the other more hypoplastic duplicate |
| 2. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure | Indicated when the two duplicates are equal in size and length; but both are hypoplastic or have a zigzag deformity with instability. The central parts of the duplicates are excised and the outer parts are combined to form the new thumb. Since the nails are shared, a split-nail appearance is expected. |
| 3. Modified Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure | Done for the same indications of the Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure but one of the duplicates has a larger nail. Here, the larger nail is retained and the hypoplatic nail is discarded. This requires unequal bony excision at the distal phalanges. Other modifications of shared bony excisions have also been described. |
| 4. “On-top” plasty | Indicated in duplications in which one thumb is adequate proximally and the other thumb contains a better pulp and nail distally. One thumb is put on top of the other. |
| 5. “Side-to-side” plasty | The same indication of the “on-top” plasty, but the duplication has a zigzag deformity. When the duplicates are united “side-to-side”, the zigzag deformity is simultaneously corrected. The side-to-side plasty allows the surgeon to retain the distal part of one duplicate and the proximal part of the other duplicate. |
Fig. 1Case 1 treated by “on-top” plasty.
a) Preoperative appearance; b) Preoperative x-ray; c,d) Intraoperative views; e) Short term result at 6 months after surgery; f) X-ray at 6 months after surgery
Fig. 210-year follow-up of Case 1.
a) Extension; b) Flexion/opposition; c) Holding a pen; d) Holding a bottle; e) Opening the cap; f) X-ray at 10 years after surgery
Tada functional scoring system for treated thumb duplications.
| FUNCTION | SCORING |
|---|---|
| Combined active motion at the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints | 2 points if active motion is over 70° |
| 1 point if active motion is between 50 and 70° | |
| 0 point if active motion is less than 50 | |
| Joint stability | 1 point if no joint stability or less than 5° of instability is present with stressing of the joint |
| 0 point if instability is 5° or more | |
| Mal-alignment | 2 points if absent or less than 10° 1 point if between 10 and 20° |
| 0 point if more than 20° |
The total score is calculated: a score of 4–5 is considered as excellent, 2–3 as fair, and 0–1 as poor.
Fig. 3Case 2 treated by “side-to-side” plasty.
a) Preoperative appearance showing the zigzag deformity; b) Preoperative x-ray
Fig. 43-year follow-up of case 2.
a) Postoperative appearance; b) Holding an object; c) X-ray at 3 years after surgery