Tuomo Thesleff1, Tero Niskakangas2, Teemu Luoto2, Grant L Iverson3, Juha Öhman2, Antti Ronkainen2. 1. Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland. Electronic address: tuomo.thesleff@pshp.fi. 2. Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Health and Rehabilitation Research, 79/96 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown Navy Yard, Charlestown, MA, 02129, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fall-induced injuries in patients are increasing in number, and they often lead to serious consequences, such as cervical spine injuries (CSI). CSI diagnostics remain a challenge despite improved radiological services. PURPOSE: Our aim is to define the incidence and risk factors for diagnostic errors among patients who died following a CSI. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: A retrospective death certificate-based study of the whole population of Finland was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: We identified 2,041 patients whose death was, according to the death certificate, either directly or indirectly caused by a CSI. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, injury- and death-related data, and adverse event (AE)-related data were the outcome measures. METHODS: All death certificates between the years 1987 and 2010 from Statistics Finland that identified a CSI as a cause death were reviewed to identify preventable AEs with the emphasis on diagnostic errors. RESULTS: Of the 2,041 patients with CSI-related deaths, 36.5% (n=744) survived at least until the next day. Errors in CSI diagnostics were found in 13.8% (n=103) of those who died later than the day of injury. Those with diagnostic errors were significantly older (median age 79.4 years, 95% confidence interval 75.9-80.1 vs. 74.9, 95% confidence interval 70.2-72.9, p<.001) and the mechanism of injury was significantly more often a fall (86.4%, n=89 vs. 69.7%, n=447, p=.002) compared with those who did not have a diagnostic error. The incidence of diagnostic errors increased slightly during the 24-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine injury diagnostics remain difficult despite improved radiological services. The majority of the patients subjected to diagnostic errors are fragile elderly people with reduced physical capacity. In our analysis, preventable AEs and diagnostic errors were most commonly associated with ground-level falls.
BACKGROUND: Fall-induced injuries in patients are increasing in number, and they often lead to serious consequences, such as cervical spine injuries (CSI). CSI diagnostics remain a challenge despite improved radiological services. PURPOSE: Our aim is to define the incidence and risk factors for diagnostic errors among patients who died following a CSI. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: A retrospective death certificate-based study of the whole population of Finland was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: We identified 2,041 patients whose death was, according to the death certificate, either directly or indirectly caused by a CSI. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, injury- and death-related data, and adverse event (AE)-related data were the outcome measures. METHODS: All death certificates between the years 1987 and 2010 from Statistics Finland that identified a CSI as a cause death were reviewed to identify preventable AEs with the emphasis on diagnostic errors. RESULTS: Of the 2,041 patients with CSI-related deaths, 36.5% (n=744) survived at least until the next day. Errors in CSI diagnostics were found in 13.8% (n=103) of those who died later than the day of injury. Those with diagnostic errors were significantly older (median age 79.4 years, 95% confidence interval 75.9-80.1 vs. 74.9, 95% confidence interval 70.2-72.9, p<.001) and the mechanism of injury was significantly more often a fall (86.4%, n=89 vs. 69.7%, n=447, p=.002) compared with those who did not have a diagnostic error. The incidence of diagnostic errors increased slightly during the 24-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine injury diagnostics remain difficult despite improved radiological services. The majority of the patients subjected to diagnostic errors are fragile elderly people with reduced physical capacity. In our analysis, preventable AEs and diagnostic errors were most commonly associated with ground-level falls.