Literature DB >> 28822797

Influence of BCR-ABL Transcript Type on Outcome in Patients With Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Imatinib.

Katia Borgia Barbosa Pagnano1, Eliana Cristina Miranda2, Márcia Torresan Delamain2, Gislaine Oliveira Duarte2, Erich Vinicius de Paula3, Irene Lorand-Metze2, Carmino Antonio de Souza3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of breakpoint cluster region gene-Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL1) transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive CML patients in chronic phase treated with imatinib in a single center were analyzed (n = 170). BCR-ABL1 transcript was evaluated using multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Exclusively patients with BCR-ABL transcripts e13a2 and/or e14a2 were included in this analysis.
RESULTS: Patients with e14a2 transcripts presented higher rates of optimal molecular responses at 3 months and higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCR) at 6 months. E13a2, e14a2, and e14a2 with e13a2 (e14a2+e13a2) groups presented similar rates of 5-year event-free, progression-free, and overall survival. There was a superior 10-year overall survival in patients with transcripts e13a2 compared with e14a2 (alone or coexpressed with e13a2; 93% vs. 73%; P = .03), although the 5-year overall survival was 96% vs. 88%, respectively (P = not significant). In a multivariate analysis, high/intermediate Sokal score and e14a3/e14a3+e14a2 were independent factors for poor overall survival (hazard risk [HR], 4.63; P = .023 for Sokal score and HR, 10.6; P = .041 for BCR-ABL transcript).
CONCLUSION: Patients with BCR-ABL transcripts e14a2 transcripts have higher rates of CCR at 6 months and higher rates of optimal molecular response at 3 months compared with e13a2 or with both transcripts, but no difference in 5-year overall, progression-free, and event-free survival. There was a superior 10-year overall survival among patients with transcripts e13a2 compared with e14a2 (alone or coexpressed with e13a2).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCR-ABL transcripts; CML; Molecular response; Survival; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28822797     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  9 in total

1.  Does BCR-ABL transcript type influence the prognosis of patients in chronic myelogenous leukemia chronic phase?

Authors:  T P de Almeida Filho; P A Maia Filho; Maritza Cavalcante Barbosa; Luana Letícia Alves Dutra; Marilena Facundo de Castro; Fernando Barroso Duarte; Acy Telles de Souza Quixadá; Romélia Pinheiro Gonçalves Lemes
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2019-02-16

2.  Diagnosis of fusion genes using targeted RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Erin E Heyer; Ira W Deveson; Danson Wooi; Christina I Selinger; Ruth J Lyons; Vanessa M Hayes; Sandra A O'Toole; Mandy L Ballinger; Devinder Gill; David M Thomas; Tim R Mercer; James Blackburn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Impact of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Pairwise and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kangkang Chen; Yingying Ruan; Kewei Tian; Peisheng Xiong; Nan Xia; Jin Li; Wen Huang; Feiyan Cao; Qifeng Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Genomic Mechanisms Influencing Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Adelina Fernandes; Naranie Shanmuganathan; Susan Branford
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Making Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) Easier in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Fact-Checking and Practical Management Tools.

Authors:  Fausto Castagnetti; Gianni Binotto; Isabella Capodanno; Atto Billio; Elisabetta Calistri; Francesco Cavazzini; Monica Crugnola; Antonella Gozzini; Gabriele Gugliotta; Mauro Krampera; Alessandro Lucchesi; Anna Merli; Maria Cristina Miggiano; Claudia Minotto; Monica Poggiaspalla; Marzia Salvucci; Barbara Scappini; Mario Tiribelli; Elena Trabacchi; Gianantonio Rosti; Sara Galimberti; Massimiliano Bonifacio
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.864

6.  Comparison of molecular responses and outcomes between BCR::ABL1 e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Yi-Jiun Su; Ming-Chung Kuo; Tsai-Yun Chen; Ming-Chung Wang; Youngsen Yang; Ming-Chun Ma; Tung-Liang Lin; Tung-Huei Lin; Hung Chang; Chieh-Lin Jerry Teng; Pei-Ching Hsiao; Chih-Cheng Chen; Po-Nan Wang; Lee-Yung Shih
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.518

7.  Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with b3a3 (e14a3) Fusion: A Rare BCR/ABL Rearrangement Presenting with Thrombocytosis - Does MTHFR Polymorphism Matter.

Authors:  Mohammad Muhsin Chisti; Daniel Steven Sanders
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2018-07-16

Review 8.  Prognostic Significance of Transcript-Type BCR - ABL1 in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Matteo Molica; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Massimo Breccia
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.576

9.  Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Harboring Atypical BCR-ABL1 Transcripts.

Authors:  Matteo Dragani; Jessica Petiti; Giovanna Rege-Cambrin; Enrico Gottardi; Filomena Daraio; Giovanni Caocci; Chiara Aguzzi; Elena Crisà; Giacomo Andreani; Francesca Caciolli; Carmen Fava
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.