Literature DB >> 28822781

Inpatient versus outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy at home for acute infections in children: a systematic review.

Penelope A Bryant1, Naomi T Katz2.   

Abstract

Inpatient management is necessary in many situations, but medical and allied-health treatments are increasingly being used on an outpatient basis to allow patients who would traditionally have been admitted to hospital to remain at home. Home-based clinical management has many potential benefits, including reduced hospital-acquired infections, cost savings, and patient and family satisfaction. Studies in adults provide evidence for the benefits of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotics, but few studies inform practice in home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for children. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, satisfaction, and cost of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for acute infections in children. We searched MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to Jan 31, 2017) and Embase (from Jan 1, 1974, to Jan 31, 2017) for studies investigating home-based and hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy and assessed them for quality. 2827 articles were identified and 19 studies were included in the systematic review. Efficacy results differed between studies depending on the outcome assessed. The incidence of complications and readmission to hospital was similar for hospital-based and home-based treatments. In seven (47%) of 15 studies, patients who had all or part of their treatment at home received treatment for longer than patients who were treated entirely in hospital. No studies showed that home-based treatment was less safe than hospital-based treatment. In all studies in which treatment satisfaction or costs were assessed, home-based treatment was satisfactory to patients or patients' families and less expensive per episode than hospital-based treatment by 30-75%. Thus, home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy might be popular and cost-effective, but randomised studies of the efficacy of this strategy are needed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42015024406).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28822781     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30345-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  5 in total

1.  Economic Burden of Home Antimicrobial Therapy: OPAT Versus Oral Therapy.

Authors:  Nathan M Krah; Tyler Bardsley; Richard Nelson; Lawanda Esquibel; Mark Crosby; Carrie L Byington; Andrew T Pavia; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2019-04

2.  Retrospective analysis of outcomes of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for necrotising otitis externa.

Authors:  Oyewole Chris Durojaiye; Augustinas Slucka; Evangelos I Kritsotakis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Pulmonary Exacerbations in Pediatric Patients: Retrospective Study in a Portuguese Cystic Fibrosis Center.

Authors:  Rosa Cardoso; Ana Lúcia Cardoso; Telma Barbosa
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 4.  Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK.

Authors:  Ann L N Chapman; Sanjay Patel; Carolyne Horner; Helen Green; Achyut Guleri; Sara Hedderwick; Susan Snape; Julie Statham; Elizabeth Wilson; Mark Gilchrist; R Andrew Seaton
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2019-08-26

5.  Delivery, setting and outcomes of paediatric Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT): a scoping review.

Authors:  Bernie Carter; Enitan D Carrol; David Porter; Matthew Peak; David Taylor-Robinson; Debra Fisher-Smith; Lucy Blake
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.