Literature DB >> 28822604

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for whole brain radiotherapy: not only for hippocampal sparing, but also for reduction of dose to organs at risk.

Sumit Sood1, Damodar Pokhrel2, Christopher McClinton2, Christopher Lominska2, Rajeev Badkul2, Hongyu Jiang2, Fen Wang2.   

Abstract

A prospective clinical trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933, has demonstrated that whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) using conformal radiation delivery technique with hippocampal avoidance is associated with less memory complications. Further sparing of other organs at risk (OARs) including the scalp, ear canals, cochleae, and parotid glands could be associated with reductions in additional toxicities for patients treated with WBRT. We investigated the feasibility of WBRT using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to spare the hippocampi and the aforementioned OARs. Ten patients previously treated with nonconformal WBRT (NC-WBRT) using opposed lateral beams were retrospectively re-planned using VMAT with hippocampal sparing according to the RTOG 0933 protocol. The OARs (scalp, auditory canals, cochleae, and parotid glands) were considered as dose-constrained structures. VMAT plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Comparison of the dosimetric parameters achieved by VMAT and NC-WBRT plans was performed using paired t-tests using upper bound p-value of < 0.001. Average beam on time and monitor units (MUs) delivered to the patients on VMAT were compared with those obtained with NC-WBRT. All VMAT plans met RTOG 0933 dosimetric criteria including the dose to hippocampi of 100% of the volume (D100%) of 8.4 ± 0.3 Gy and maximum dose of 15.6 ± 0.4 Gy, respectively. A statistically significant dose reduction (p < 0.001) to all OARs was achieved. The mean and maximum scalp doses were reduced by an average of 9 Gy (32%) and 2 Gy (6%), respectively. The mean and maximum doses to the auditory canals were reduced from 29.5 ± 0.5 Gy and 31.0 ± 0.4 Gy with NC-WBRT, to 21.8 ± 1.6 Gy (26%) and 27.4 ± 1.4 Gy (12%) with VMAT. VMAT also reduced mean and maximum doses to the cochlea by an average of 4 Gy (13%) and 2 Gy (6%), respectively. The parotid glands mean and maximum doses with VMAT were 4.4 ± 1.9 Gy and 15.7 ± 5.0 Gy, compared to 12.8 ± 4.9 Gy and 30.6 ± 0.5 Gy with NC-WBRT, respectively. The average dose reduction of mean and maximum of parotid glands from VMAT were 65% and 50%, respectively. The average beam on time and MUs were 2.3minutes and 719 on VMAT, and 0.7 minutes and 350 on NC-WBRT. This study demonstrated the feasibility of WBRT using VMAT to not only spare the hippocampi, but also significantly reduce dose to OARs. These advantages of VMAT could potentially decrease the toxicities associated with NC-WBRT and improve patients' quality of life, especially for patients with favorable prognosis receiving WBRT or patients receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory canal; Dose reduction; Hippocampal sparing; Organs at risk; Parotid; Scalp; Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Whole brain radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28822604     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  12 in total

1.  Parotid gland dose reduction in the hippocampus avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimizu; Koji Sasaki; Takahiro Aoyama; Hiroyuki Tachibana; Yutaro Koide; Tohru Iwata; Tomoki Kitagawa; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Plan Quality Comparison Between Hippocampus-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Treated With Halcyon and Tomotherapy Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Yokoyama; Hiromasa Kurosaki; Hajime Oyoshi; Kosei Miura; Nobuko Utsumi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

3.  Dosimetric study of whole-brain irradiation with high-energy photon beams for dose reduction to the scalp.

Authors:  Masafumi Sawada; Etsuo Kunieda; Takeshi Akiba; Shigeto Kabuki; Ryuta Nagao; Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa; Yoshitsugu Matsumoto; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Sparing the hippocampus and the hypothalamic- pituitary region during whole brain radiotherapy: a volumetric modulated arc therapy planning study.

Authors:  P Mehta; S Janssen; F B Fahlbusch; S M Schmid; J Gebauer; F Cremers; C Ziemann; M Tartz; D Rades
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced long-term depression of excitatory postsynaptic potential in the rat hippocampal dentate gyrus.

Authors:  Bao-Liang Zhang; Yue-Shan Fan; Ji-Wei Wang; Zi-Wei Zhou; Yin-Gang Wu; Meng-Chen Yang; Dong-Dong Sun; Jian-Ning Zhang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Quality assurance analysis of hippocampal avoidance in a melanoma whole brain radiotherapy randomized trial shows good compliance.

Authors:  Geoffrey Martinage; Angela M Hong; Mike Fay; Thanuja Thachil; Daniel Roos; Narelle Williams; Serigne Lo; Gerald Fogarty
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Use of a head-tilting baseplate during volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to better protect organs at risk in hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT).

Authors:  Se An Oh; Ji Woon Yea; Jae Won Park; Jaehyeon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of a Head-Tilting Baseplate During Tomotherapy to Shorten the Irradiation Time and Protect the Hippocampus and Lens in Hippocampal Sparing-Whole Brain Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kosei Miura; Hiromasa Kurosaki; Nobuko Utsumi; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

9.  Non-coplanar VMAT plans for postoperative primary brain tumour to reduce dose to hippocampus, temporal lobe and cochlea: a planning study.

Authors:  Eva Yi Wah Cheung; Kevin Ho Yuen Lee; Wilson Tin Long Lau; Amy Pik Yan Lau; Pak Ying Wat
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Arc Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Glioblastoma-Does Clinical Benefit Follow Dosimetric Advantage?

Authors:  Tommy Sheu; Tina M Briere; Adenike M Olanrewaju; Mary Frances McAleer
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.