Linda E Carlson1,2, Erin Zelinski3, Kirsti Toivonen4, Michelle Flynn4, Maryam Qureshi4, Katherine-Ann Piedalue4, Rachel Grant5. 1. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C1, Canada. lcarlso@ucalgary.ca. 2. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C1, Canada. lcarlso@ucalgary.ca. 3. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C1, Canada. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. 5. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many people living with cancer use complementary therapies, and some of the most popular are mind-body therapies (MBTs), including relaxation and imagery, hypnosis, yoga, meditation, tai chi and qigong, and art therapies. The efficacy of these modalities was reviewed by assessing recent findings in the context of cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS: These therapies show efficacy in treating common cancer-related side effects, including nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depressive symptoms and improving overall quality of life. Some also have effects on biomarkers such as immune function and stress hormones. Overall studies lack large sample sizes and active comparison groups. Common issues around clearly defining treatments including standardizing treatment components, dose, intensity, duration and training of providers make generalization across studies difficult. MBTs in cancer care show great promise and evidence of efficacy for treating many common symptoms. Future studies should investigate more diverse cancer populations using standardized treatment protocols and directly compare various MBTs to one another.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many people living with cancer use complementary therapies, and some of the most popular are mind-body therapies (MBTs), including relaxation and imagery, hypnosis, yoga, meditation, tai chi and qigong, and art therapies. The efficacy of these modalities was reviewed by assessing recent findings in the context of cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS: These therapies show efficacy in treating common cancer-related side effects, including nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depressive symptoms and improving overall quality of life. Some also have effects on biomarkers such as immune function and stress hormones. Overall studies lack large sample sizes and active comparison groups. Common issues around clearly defining treatments including standardizing treatment components, dose, intensity, duration and training of providers make generalization across studies difficult. MBTs in cancer care show great promise and evidence of efficacy for treating many common symptoms. Future studies should investigate more diverse cancer populations using standardized treatment protocols and directly compare various MBTs to one another.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anxiety, depression, quality of life, fatigue, pain; Art therapy; Complementary therapies; Creative therapies; Hypnosis; Imagery; Integrative oncology; Mediation; Qigong; Relaxation; Tai chi; Yoga
Authors: Suzanne C Danhauer; Elizabeth L Addington; Stephanie J Sohl; Alejandro Chaoul; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laurien M Buffart; Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Ingrid I Riphagen; Johannes Brug; Willem van Mechelen; Wendy J Brown; Mai J M Chinapaw Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Julia S Fukuhara; Judith O'Haver; James A Proudfoot; Jeanie M Spies; Dennis J Kuo Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Kaitlyn Lapen; Elaine Cha; Christina C Huang; David M Rosenberg; Michael K Rooney; Mark McArthur; Ritu Arya; Christina H Son; Anne R McCall; Daniel W Golden Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nicholas Emard; Kathleen A Lynch; Kevin T Liou; Thomas Atkinson; Angela K Green; Bobby Daly; Kelly Trevino; Jun J Mao Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2021-06-08
Authors: Byeongsang Oh; Diana Van Der Saag; Morita Morgia; Susan Carroll; Frances Boyle; Michael Back; Gillian Lamoury Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2020-12-24
Authors: Kelly E Rentscher; Judith E Carroll; Mark B Juckett; Christopher L Coe; Aimee T Broman; Paul J Rathouz; Peiman Hematti; Erin S Costanzo Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506