| Literature DB >> 28820882 |
Seyed Hassan Nikookar1, Mahmoud Fazeli-Dinan2, Shahyad Azari-Hamidian3, Seyed Nouraddin Mousavinasab4, Mohsen Aarabi5, Seyyed Payman Ziapour1,6, Yahya Esfandyari7, Ahmadali Enayati8.
Abstract
Characteristics of mosquito larval habitats are important in determining whether they can survive and successfully complete their developmental stages. Therefore, data on the ecological factors affecting mosquito density and abundance especially the physicochemical properties of water of their breeding sites, can possibly be helpful in implementing larval management programs. Mosquito larvae were collected using a standard 350 ml dipper from fixed habitats including: artificial pool, river edge, creek and etc, in 30 villages of 16 counties from May-December 2014. Water samples were collected during larval collection and temperature (°C), acidity (pH), turbidity (NTU), electrical conductivity (μS/cm), alkalinity (mg/l CaCO3), total hardness (mg/l), nitrate (mg/l), chloride (mg/l), phosphate (mg/l) and sulphate (mg/l) were measured using standard methods. Spearman correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis test of nonparametric analysis, Chi-square (χ2) analysis, regression analysis and C8 interspecific correlation coefficient were used for data analysis. A total of 7,566 mosquito larvae belonging to 15 species representing three genera were collected from fixed larval breeding places. Culex pipiens was the dominant species except in four villages where An. maculipennis s.l. and Cx. torrentium were predominant. There was a significant positive correlation between the density of Cx. pipiens and electrical conductivity, alkalinity, total hardness and chloride, whereas no significant negative correlation was observed between physicochemical factors and larval density. The highest interspecific association of up to 0.596 was observed between An. maculipennis s.l/An. pseudopictus followed by up to 0.435 between An. maculipennis s.l/An. hyrcanus and An. hyrcanus/An. pseudopictus. The correlations observed between physicochemical factors and larval density, can possibly confirm the effect of these parameters on the breeding activities of mosquitoes, and may be indicative of the presence of certain mosquito fauna in a given region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28820882 PMCID: PMC5576754 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map shows sampling places in various counties and villages of Mazandaran Province (s1 and s2 stand for station 1 and station 2).
These comprise: Galugah County (s1: Nezammahale, s2: Tileno villages), Behshahr (s1: Hossein Abad, s2: Al Tappeh), Neka (s1: Chalmardi, s2: Komishan), Sari (s1: Qajar Kheil, s2: Dallak Kheil), Ghaemshahr (s1: Rostam kola, s2: Shahrud Kola), Savadkooh (s1: Sorkh Kola, s2: Andar Koli), Juybar (s1: Astanesar, s2: Pain Zarrin Kola), Babolsar (s1: Kikha Mahalleh), Fereydunkenar (s1: Firuzabad), Amol (s1: Qadi Mahalleh, s2: Razakeh), Mahmudabad (s1: Galesh Pol, s2: Bishe Kola), Noor (s1: Abbasa, s2: Karat Koti), Noshahr (s1: Aliabad Mir, s2: Shofeskaj), Chalos (s1: Sinava, s2: Zavat), Tonekabon (s1: Asadabad, s2: Soleymanabad) and Ramsar (s1: Shah Mansur Mahale, s2: Potak). Babol (NS: no sampling).
Fig 2A variety of fixed habitats of mosquito larvae in Mazandaran Province, 2014 (Original photo).
Fig 3Composition of the mosquito larvae collected from eleven types of fixed larval habitats in Mazandaran Province, May- December 2014.
Coefficients of interspecific association (C8) for larvae of different species in eleven types of fixed habitats in Mazandaran Province, May-December 2014.
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| * | 0.435 | 0.435 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| * | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| * | 0 | |||||||||||||||
| * | ||||||||||||||||
Fig 4Distribution and number of mosquito larvae collected from fixed habitats in villages of Mazandaran Province, May- December 2014.
Means and standard deviations of physicochemical characteristics, along with occurrence of mosquito species in different larval habitats in Mazandaran Province, May-December 2014.
| Occurrence in villages | Temperature | Acidity (pH) | Turbidity | Electrical conductivity (μS/cm) | Alkalinity | Nitrate (mg/l) | Total hardness (mg/l) | Chloride | Phosphate | Sulphate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 7.35 | 21 | 496 | 204 | 0.840 | 192 | 85.97 | 0.558 | 14.18 | |
| 17.29± 0.95 | 7.22±0.35 | 42.57±62.72 | 705.71±832.65 | 245.14±179.31 | 2±2.24 | 372.57±331.11 | 134.10±267.26 | 0.99±1.22 | 117.77±156.58 | |
| 17.29±1.13 | 7.24±0.33 | 32.64±46.27 | 613.21±614.68 | 222.29±140.30 | 1.96±2.49 | 502.00±614.68 | 94.04±187.77 | 0.67±0.94 | 102.93±130.81 | |
| 17.30±1.05 | 7.25±0.34 | 33.30±53.41 | 712.20±766.61 | 244.90±167.73 | 1.87±1.87 | 336.80±288.27 | 144.15±251.81 | 0.86±1.05 | 101.23±135.34 | |
| 16.00±0 | 7.6±0 | 97.00±0 | 1109.00±0 | 500.00±0 | 5.23±0 | 716.00±0 | 102.96±0 | 3.20±0 | 446.18±0 | |
| 16.33±2.35 | 7.13±0.42 | 34.97±65.15 | 850.10±994.24 | 239.63±149.66 | 2.10±2.92 | 450.80±466.48 | 353.82±942.00 | 0.54±0.82 | 101.87±96.92 | |
| 16.50±2.12 | 7.12±0.45 | 38.23±69.42 | 69.42±1051.15 | 248.81±158.39 | 2.00±2.85 | 479.23±494.97 | 211.54±366.40 | 0.52±0.76 | 102.62±101.02 | |
| 16.25±2.41 | 7.14±0.44 | 36.96±67.06 | 885.43±1020.51 | 244.46±152.06 | 1.87±2.53 | 465.57±478.88 | 478.88±971.88 | 0.47±0.78 | 105.71±99.27 | |
| 14.67±2.94 | 6.97±0.50 | 81.17±126.42 | 614.00±446.94 | 265.33±144.43 | 2.33±2.99 | 440±332.19 | 58.14±36.91 | 0.85±1.24 | 188.84±156.99 | |
| 16.57±0.97 | 6.88±0.40 | 29.71±33.97 | 1430.86±1395.97 | 336±227.69 | 3.26±2.97 | 588±386.43 | 332.03±517.66 | 1.15±1.21 | 155.50±142.36 | |
| 16.88±1.35 | 7.11±0.17 | 19±12.87 | 748.88±1139.53 | 239.50±216.74 | 2.38±2.75 | 612.50±812.35 | 826.24±1751.24 | 0.43±0.79 | 122.64±102.50 | |
| 17 | 7.00±0.78 | 12.50±0.70 | 1169.50±590.43 | 368.50±96.87 | 1.37±0.27 | 440±39.59 | 279.41±273.56 | 0.58±0.10 | 146.13±4.94 | |
| 16.27±2.40 | 7.17±0.37 | 16.20±14.42 | 899.80±1116.41 | 253.67±174.98 | 1.24±1.45 | 537.60±607.43 | 572.28±1297.94 | 0.57±0.84 | 77.36±79.12 | |
| 16.05±2.06 | 7.13±0.46 | 35.95±73.21 | 761.55±824.98 | 231.25±128.02 | 2.02±2.95 | 474.40±514.07 | 388.47±1105.26 | 0.63±0.93 | 113.16±108.03 | |
| 10 | 7.44 | 21 | 419 | 168 | 0.30 | 300 | 45.98 | 0 | 164.54 |
Correlation coefficient between larval density and physicochemical properties of larval habitats adjusted by the habitats types in Mazandaran Province, August 2014.
| Species | Temperature | Acidity (pH) | Turbidity | Electrical conductivity (μS/cm) | Alkalinity | Nitrate (mg/l) | Total hardness (mg/l) | Chloride (mg/l) | Phosphate | Sulphate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.174 | 0.118 | 0.107 | 0.054 | 0.032 | 0.011 | -0.150 | 0.086 | 0.141 | -0.268 | |
| Sig. | 0.357 | 0.534 | 0.572 | 0.778 | 0.866 | 0.955 | 0.428 | 0.652 | 0.456 | 0.152 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.240 | 0.147 | 0.011 | -0.184 | -0.110 | 0.031 | -0.150 | -0.263 | 0.186 | -0.054 | |
| Sig. | 0.201 | 0.440 | 0.955 | 0.330 | 0.562 | 0.871 | 0.428 | 0.160 | 0.325 | 0.776 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.346 | 0.241 | 0.113 | -0.126 | -0.099 | 0.111 | -0.079 | -0.241 | 0.146 | -0.095 | |
| Sig. | 0.061 | 0.200 | 0.553 | 0.507 | 0.604 | 0.561 | 0.677 | 0.199 | 0.441 | 0.618 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.274 | 0.226 | -0.023 | -0.152 | -0.042 | 0.093 | -0.168 | -0.298 | 0.245 | -0.115 | |
| Sig. | 0.142 | 0.229 | 0.904 | 0.422 | 0.825 | 0.627 | 0.376 | 0.109 | 0.192 | 0.544 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.098 | 0.268 | 0.269 | 0.182 | 0.290 | 0.226 | 0.225 | 0.140 | 0.315 | 0.311 | |
| Sig. | 0.606 | 0.152 | 0.151 | 0.335 | 0.120 | 0.231 | 0.231 | 0.462 | 0.090 | 0.094 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.110 | -0.271 | 0.044 | 0.077 | -0.024 | 0.321 | |||||
| Sig. | 0.562 | 0.147 | 0.819 | 0.684 | 0.901 | 0.084 | |||||
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.099 | 0.040 | 0.113 | 0.194 | 0.145 | -0.139 | 0.146 | -0.122 | -0.075 | 0.174 | |
| Sig. | 0.602 | 0.834 | 0.552 | 0.305 | 0.444 | 0.463 | 0.440 | 0.520 | 0.692 | 0.358 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.219 | -0.131 | -0.240 | 0.287 | 0.227 | 0.130 | 0.136 | 0.320 | -0.322 | 0.203 | |
| Sig. | 0.245 | 0.490 | 0.201 | 0.124 | 0.228 | 0.492 | 0.475 | 0.085 | 0.082 | 0.282 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.316 | -0.312 | 0.092 | -0.130 | -0.001 | -0.048 | -0.085 | -0.150 | -0.017 | 0.134 | |
| Sig. | 0.088 | 0.094 | 0.629 | 0.495 | 0.996 | 0.802 | 0.655 | 0.428 | 0.930 | 0.479 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.072 | -0.201 | 0.044 | 0.262 | 0.232 | 0.220 | 0.254 | 0.136 | 0.277 | 0.221 | |
| Sig. | 0.706 | 0.287 | 0.816 | 0.162 | 0.218 | 0.243 | 0.175 | 0.475 | 0.139 | 0.240 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.019 | -0.132 | 0.044 | -0.047 | -0.020 | 0.312 | -0.165 | 0.059 | 0.306 | -0.315 | |
| Sig. | 0.920 | 0.486 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.916 | 0.094 | 0.382 | 0.755 | 0.100 | 0.090 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.033 | 0.247 | -0.032 | 0.225 | 0.247 | 0.075 | 0.097 | 0.204 | 0.098 | 0.139 | |
| Sig. | 0.864 | 0.188 | 0.866 | 0.231 | 0.189 | 0.693 | 0.612 | 0.280 | 0.607 | 0.462 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.062 | -0.090 | 0.056 | 0.086 | 0.170 | -0.180 | 0.205 | 0.180 | 0.141 | -0.139 | |
| Sig. | 0.744 | 0.636 | 0.769 | 0.651 | 0.370 | 0.342 | 0.277 | 0.341 | 0.459 | 0.464 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.348 | -0.138 | -0.049 | -0.103 | 0.106 | -0.041 | 0.057 | -0.013 | 0.199 | 0.171 | |
| Sig. | 0.060 | 0.468 | 0.796 | 0.588 | 0.577 | 0.831 | 0.764 | 0.945 | 0.291 | 0.365 | |
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.294 | 0.161 | 0.107 | 0.011 | -0.118 | -0.097 | 0.000 | -0.032 | -0.228 | 0.182 | |
| Sig. | 0.115 | 0.395 | 0.572 | 0.955 | 0.534 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 0.866 | 0.225 | 0.335 |
Fig 5Regression relationships between Cx. pipiens and EC, alkalinity, total hardness and chloride of larval habitats in Mazandaran Province, August 2014.