Fiona A Bull1, Daniel T Baptista-Hon, Claire Sneddon, Lisa Wright, Wendy Walwyn, Tim G Hales. 1. From the Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom (F.A.B., D.T.B.-H., C.S., L.W., T.G.H.); and Shirley and Stefan Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, California (W.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prolonged opioid administration leads to tolerance characterized by reduced analgesic potency. Pain management is additionally compromised by the hedonic effects of opioids, the cause of their misuse. The multifunctional protein β-arrestin2 regulates the hedonic effects of morphine and participates in tolerance. These actions might reflect µ opioid receptor up-regulation through reduced endocytosis. β-Arrestin2 also recruits kinases to µ receptors. We explored the role of Src kinase in morphine analgesic tolerance, locomotor stimulation, and reinforcement in C57BL/6 mice. METHODS: Analgesic (tail withdrawal latency; percentage of maximum possible effect, n = 8 to 16), locomotor (distance traveled, n = 7 to 8), and reinforcing (conditioned place preference, n = 7 to 8) effects of morphine were compared in wild-type, µ, µ, and β-arrestin2 mice. The influence of c-Src inhibitors dasatinib (n = 8) and PP2 (n = 12) was examined. RESULTS: Analgesia in morphine-treated wild-type mice exhibited tolerance, declining by day 10 to a median of 62% maximum possible effect (interquartile range, 29 to 92%). Tolerance was absent from mice receiving dasatinib. Tolerance was enhanced in µ mice (34% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 5 to 52% on day 5); dasatinib attenuated tolerance (100% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 68 to 100%), as did PP2 (91% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 78 to 100%). By contrast, c-Src inhibition affected neither morphine-evoked locomotor stimulation nor reinforcement. Remarkably, dasatinib not only attenuated tolerance but also reversed established tolerance in µ mice. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of c-Src inhibitors to inhibit tolerance, thereby restoring analgesia, without altering the hedonic effect of morphine, makes c-Src inhibitors promising candidates as adjuncts to opioid analgesics.
BACKGROUND: Prolonged opioid administration leads to tolerance characterized by reduced analgesic potency. Pain management is additionally compromised by the hedonic effects of opioids, the cause of their misuse. The multifunctional protein β-arrestin2 regulates the hedonic effects of morphine and participates in tolerance. These actions might reflect µ opioid receptor up-regulation through reduced endocytosis. β-Arrestin2 also recruits kinases to µ receptors. We explored the role of Src kinase in morphine analgesic tolerance, locomotor stimulation, and reinforcement in C57BL/6 mice. METHODS: Analgesic (tail withdrawal latency; percentage of maximum possible effect, n = 8 to 16), locomotor (distance traveled, n = 7 to 8), and reinforcing (conditioned place preference, n = 7 to 8) effects of morphine were compared in wild-type, µ, µ, and β-arrestin2 mice. The influence of c-Src inhibitors dasatinib (n = 8) and PP2 (n = 12) was examined. RESULTS:Analgesia in morphine-treated wild-type mice exhibited tolerance, declining by day 10 to a median of 62% maximum possible effect (interquartile range, 29 to 92%). Tolerance was absent from mice receiving dasatinib. Tolerance was enhanced in µ mice (34% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 5 to 52% on day 5); dasatinib attenuated tolerance (100% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 68 to 100%), as did PP2 (91% maximum possible effect; interquartile range, 78 to 100%). By contrast, c-Src inhibition affected neither morphine-evoked locomotor stimulation nor reinforcement. Remarkably, dasatinib not only attenuated tolerance but also reversed established tolerance in µ mice. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of c-Src inhibitors to inhibit tolerance, thereby restoring analgesia, without altering the hedonic effect of morphine, makes c-Src inhibitors promising candidates as adjuncts to opioid analgesics.
Authors: C E Groer; K Tidgewell; R A Moyer; W W Harding; R B Rothman; T E Prisinzano; L M Bohn Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: L M Luttrell; S S Ferguson; Y Daaka; W E Miller; S Maudsley; G J Della Rocca; F Lin; H Kawakatsu; K Owada; D K Luttrell; M G Caron; R J Lefkowitz Journal: Science Date: 1999-01-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hoa Lam; Matthew Maga; Amynah Pradhan; Christopher J Evans; Nigel T Maidment; Tim G Hales; Wendy Walwyn Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 3.395
Authors: Meredith Noble; Jonathan R Treadwell; Stephen J Tregear; Vivian H Coates; Philip J Wiffen; Clarisse Akafomo; Karen M Schoelles Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-01-20
Authors: Fani Pantouli; Travis W Grim; Cullen L Schmid; Agnes Acevedo-Canabal; Nicole M Kennedy; Michael D Cameron; Thomas D Bannister; Laura M Bohn Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Attila Keresztes; Keith Olson; Paul Nguyen; Marissa A Lopez-Pier; Ryan Hecksel; Natalie K Barker; Zekun Liu; Victor Hruby; John Konhilas; Paul R Langlais; John M Streicher Journal: Pain Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Daniel T Baptista-Hon; Mark Smith; Samuel Singleton; Lysbeth H Antonides; Niamh Nic Daeid; Craig McKenzie; Tim G Hales Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 8.739