PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To answer how the planned intervention was performed in routine care, which factors supported or distracted from its implementation, and how key organizational structures have been built and sustained. . RESEARCH APPROACH: Mixed-methods process evaluation. . SETTING: Two German outpatient cancer clinics. . PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling of 297 recruited patients with gynecologic cancer, their treating oncology nurses, and their interprofessional healthcare team, and the clinical stakeholders of two different outpatient cancer clinics. . METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), five distinct interrelated substudies were designed to evaluate intervention characteristics, inner and outer settings, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analyzed separately and then integrated into a framework analysis. . FINDINGS: Oncology nurses found the regular process analytic sessions to be beneficial, not only for sharing their experience, but also for experiencing social support and social connectedness. . INTERPRETATION: Key implementation facets of the nurse-led intervention will be examined systematically. The results can guide future implementation processes, which need to be tailored to interested facilities. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The CFIR framework is well established but not yet widely applied in supportive treatment research. The current study aims to apply and combine this framework with the concept of intervention fidelity.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To answer how the planned intervention was performed in routine care, which factors supported or distracted from its implementation, and how key organizational structures have been built and sustained. . RESEARCH APPROACH: Mixed-methods process evaluation. . SETTING: Two German outpatientcancer clinics. . PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sampling of 297 recruited patients with gynecologic cancer, their treating oncology nurses, and their interprofessional healthcare team, and the clinical stakeholders of two different outpatientcancer clinics. . METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), five distinct interrelated substudies were designed to evaluate intervention characteristics, inner and outer settings, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analyzed separately and then integrated into a framework analysis. . FINDINGS: Oncology nurses found the regular process analytic sessions to be beneficial, not only for sharing their experience, but also for experiencing social support and social connectedness. . INTERPRETATION: Key implementation facets of the nurse-led intervention will be examined systematically. The results can guide future implementation processes, which need to be tailored to interested facilities. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The CFIR framework is well established but not yet widely applied in supportive treatment research. The current study aims to apply and combine this framework with the concept of intervention fidelity.
Entities:
Keywords:
complementary and alternative medicine; health services research ; integrative healthcare services; nurse-led intervention; process evaluation
Authors: Wendy F Cohn; Chelsea E Canan; Sarah Knight; Ava Lena Waldman; Rebecca Dillingham; Karen Ingersoll; Julie Schexnayder; Tabor E Flickinger Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Christopher G Kemp; Brooke A Jarrett; Churl-Su Kwon; Lanxin Song; Nathalie Jetté; Jaime C Sapag; Judith Bass; Laura Murray; Deepa Rao; Stefan Baral Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Nadja Klafke; Cornelia Mahler; Cornelia von Hagens; Lorenz Uhlmann; Martina Bentner; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andreas Mueller; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefanie Joos Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.452