Literature DB >> 28820304

Predictors of quality of life and survival following Gamma Knife surgery for lung cancer brain metastases: a prospective study.

Sidsel Bragstad1,2, Marianne Flatebø3, Gerd Karin Natvig2, Geir Egil Eide2,4, Geir Olve Skeie5, Maziar Behbahani1,6, Paal-Henning Pedersen1,7, Per Øyvind Enger1,8, Bente Sandvei Skeie1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Lung cancer (LC) patients who develop brain metastases (BMs) have a poor prognosis. Estimations of survival and risk of treatment-related deterioration in quality of life (QOL) are important when deciding on treatment. Although we know of several prognostic factors for LC patients with BMs, the role of QOL has not been established. Authors of this study set out to evaluate changes in QOL following Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for BMs in LC patients and QOL as a prognostic factor for survival. METHODS Forty-four of 48 consecutive LC patients with BMs underwent GKS in the period from May 2010 to September 2011, and their QOL was prospectively assessed before and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after GKS by using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR) questionnaire. A mixed linear regression model was used to identify potential predictive factors for QOL and to assess the effect of GKS and the disease course on QOL at follow-up. RESULTS Mean QOL as measured by the brain cancer subscale (BRCS) of the FACT-BR remained stable from baseline (score 53.0) up to 12 months post-GKS (57.1; p = 0.624). The BRCS score improved for 32 patients (72.3%) with a total BM volume ≤ 5 cm3. Mean improvement in these patients was 0.45 points each month of follow-up, compared to a decline of 0.50 points each month despite GKS treatment in patients with BM volumes > 5 cm3 (p = 0.04). Asymptomatic BMs (p = 0.01), a lower recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification (p = 0.04), and a higher Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (p < 0.01) at baseline were predictors for a high, stable QOL after GKS. After multivariate analysis, a high KPS score (p < 0.01) remained the only positive predictor of a high, stable QOL post-GKS. Median survival post-GKS was 5.6 months (95% CI 1.0-10.3). A higher BRCS score (p = 0.01), higher KPS score (p = 0.01), female sex (p = 0.01), and the absence of liver (p = 0.02), adrenal (p = 0.02), and bone metastases (p = 0.03) predicted longer survival in unadjusted models. However, in multivariate analyses, a higher BRCS score (p < 0.01), female sex (p = 0.01), and the absence of bone metastases (p = 0.02) at GKS remained significant predictors. Finally, the BRCS score's predictive value for survival was compared with the values for the variables behind well-known prognostic indices: age, KPS score, extracranial disease status, and number and volume of BMs. Both BRCS score (p = 0.01) and BM volume (p = 0.05) remained significant predictors for survival in the final model. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported QOL according to the BRCS is a predictor of survival in patients with BMs and may be helpful in deciding on the optimal treatment. Gamma Knife surgery is a safe and effective therapeutic modality that improves QOL for LC patients with a BM volume ≤ 5 cm3 at treatment. Careful follow-up and salvage therapy on demand seem to prevent worsening of QOL due to relapse of BMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BM = brain metastasis; BRCS = brain cancer subscale; DS-GPA = diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; EORTC = European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; EWB = emotional well-being; FACT-BR = Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Brain; FACT-G = FACT general version; FWB = functional well-being; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Brain subscore; GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; Gamma Knife surgery; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; LC = lung cancer; MLM = mixed linear model; NSCLC = non–small cell lung cancer; PWB = physical well-being; QOL = quality of life; RPA = recursive partitioning analysis; RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; SCLC = small cell lung cancer; SIR = prognostic score index for radiosurgery; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; SWB = social well-being; TOI = trial outcome index; WBRT = whole-brain radiation therapy; brain metastases; lung cancer; oncology; quality of life; stereotactic radiosurgery; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820304     DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS161659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormone-Dependent Tumors and Sexuality in the Neuro-Oncology of Women (N.O.W.): Women's Brain Tumors, Gaps in Sexuality Considerations, and a Need for Evidence-Based Guidelines.

Authors:  Na Tosha N Gatson; Maria L Boccia; Kerianne R Taylor; Jada K O Mack; Ekokobe Fonkem
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Health related quality of life trajectories after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius; Laura Donovan; Jason Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Clinical outcomes of patients with multiple courses of radiosurgery for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Won-Jae Lee; Jung-Won Choi; Doo-Sik Kong; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Executive summary from American Radium Society's appropriate use criteria on neurocognition after stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Michael T Milano; Veronica L S Chiang; Scott G Soltys; Tony J C Wang; Simon S Lo; Alexandria Brackett; Seema Nagpal; Samuel Chao; Amit K Garg; Siavash Jabbari; Lia M Halasz; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Jonathan P S Knisely; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Health-related quality of life of patients with brain metastases selected for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Eline Verhaak; Karin Gehring; Patrick E J Hanssens; Margriet M Sitskoorn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Quality of Life and Role of Palliative and Supportive Care for Patients With Brain Metastases and Caregivers: A Review.

Authors:  Adela Wu; Gabriela Ruiz Colón; Michael Lim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Quality of Life and Cognitive Function Evaluations and Interventions for Patients with Brain Metastases in the Radiation Oncology Clinic.

Authors:  Jennifer K Matsui; Haley K Perlow; Cyril Baiyee; Alex R Ritter; Mark V Mishra; Joseph A Bovi; Vinai Gondi; Paul D Brown; Ashlee R Loughan; Heather E Leeper; Erica Dawson; Joshua D Palmer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Analysis of Key Clinical Variables and Radiological Manifestations Associated with the Treatment Response of Patients with Brain Metastases to Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Peng Du; Hongyi Chen; Li Shen; Xiao Liu; Jiawei Chen; Xuefan Wu; Tonggang Yu; Daoying Geng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Influence of Epilepsy on the Quality of Life of Patients with Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Stanisław Krajewski; Magdalena Wójcik; Marek Harat; Jacek Furtak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  New developments in brain metastases.

Authors:  Anna S Berghoff; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.