Literature DB >> 28820146

Head up, heels down, posture perfect: Ergonomics for an ophthalmologist.

Santosh G Honavar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820146      PMCID: PMC5598171          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_711_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Every 10 seconds, a worker is temporarily or permanently disabled and some of them are physicians and surgeons. It is a well-known fact that medical professionals are prone to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), with ophthalmologists being particularly at a higher risk.[12] Common MSDs in ophthalmologists include disabling back pain, neck pain, numbness in the hands and legs, and carpal tunnel syndrome.[12] It may be hard to believe that most work-related disabilities in ophthalmologists are caused by simply doing the routine – performing a slit-lamp examination, using an indirect ophthalmoscope, or even sitting on a surgeon's chair.[1] Although these injuries are chronic in evolution, the effects can be devastating. Here are some hard facts: A survey of 325 practicing ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom in 1994 found that 54% had significant back pain, with those longest in practice being worse affected.[3] This number seems to have risen to 64% according to a more recent study.[4] Significantly, 34% reported pain while operating, and 32% had pain while using a slit-lamp In a survey of 162 ophthalmologists in Iran, 80% reported chronic back pain and 55% had chronic headaches[5] A survey of American ophthalmologists in 2005 revealed that 52% of the 697 respondents reported neck, upper body, or lower back pain, with 15% having to curtail their work as a consequence.[6] Low back pain was present in 39% of respondents, followed by upper extremity symptoms (33%) and neck pain (33%) Two-thirds of ophthalmologists in Saudi Arabia had mild to moderate neck and upper back pain[7] This issue of Indian Journal of Ophthalmology carries the results of a survey among practicing Indian ophthalmologists, which pegs self-reported back pain at a concerning 71%[8] Vitreoretinal surgeons are specifically at a high risk of developing MSD.[9] As expected, among a large cohort of vitreoretinal surgeons, 55% reported both back and neck pain, and 7% required surgery to relieve their symptoms[1] Of 130 American ophthalmic plastic surgeons, 73% had pain associated while performing surgery; nine of them had to discontinue operating as consequence.[10] It is evident that improper work ergonomics leads to disability, poor productivity, and early retirement.[1112131415] The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has identified four factors influencing the development of MSDs: (1) environmental hazards, (2) human biologic factors, (3) behavioral factors or unhealthy lifestyles, and (4) inadequacies in existing health care.[11] The problem being multifactorial, intervention to minimize the risk must have a layered approach. Physical strains directly associated with the ophthalmic profession including stress on the shoulders, neck, back, arms, and hands resulting from poor posture during examination and surgery as well as repetitive actions common to the surgical profession are some of the modifiable risk factors. One of the eminently modifiable situations is ergonomic redesigning of our individual work places. Ergonomics is the process of designing or arranging workplaces, products, and systems so that they suit the professionals who use them. This is in sharp contrast to the typical hospital design that assumes that one size fits all. The American Academy of Ophthalmology recognized the problem early and set up a task force to address the issue. The task force offers an online course encompassing the best practices in work place ergonomics.[121314] Experts have recommended essential work ergonomics to help alleviate MSDs faced by the ophthalmologists [Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2].[131415] Ergonomic intervention as detailed in Table 1, prophylactic neck and back exercises and timely professional consultation may help alleviate symptoms and maintain better work efficiency.[1314] In a study of dentists undergoing an ergonomic makeover, a majority of them reported disappearance of their symptoms.[16] In that same study, the mean working hours and work efficiency reportedly improved.
Table 1

Ergonomics for an ophthalmologist – risk factors and possible solutions

Figure 1

Posture for slit-lamp evaluation. Ophthalmologist is slumping toward the slit-lamp with the neck extended, thus putting strain on the neck and back (left) – this is a wrong posture. Ophthalmologist has brought the slit-lamp forward and has adjusted the height to sit erect without having to lean forward or change the neck angle (right) – this is an ergonomically appropriate posture. (Adapted from http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/issues/2012/january-2012/of-ophthalmologists-aching-backs)[15]

Figure 2

Posture for operating microscope. Microscope ocular and objective are at a straight line, with the ophthalmologist having to lean forward constantly (left) – this is a wrong posture. If the ocular is moved 20°–25° toward the surgeon and the operating chair height is appropriately adjusted, the surgeon can sit straight (right) – this is an ergonomically appropriate posture. (Adapted from http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/issues/2012/january-2012/of-ophthalmologists-aching-backs)[15]

Ergonomics for an ophthalmologist – risk factors and possible solutions Posture for slit-lamp evaluation. Ophthalmologist is slumping toward the slit-lamp with the neck extended, thus putting strain on the neck and back (left) – this is a wrong posture. Ophthalmologist has brought the slit-lamp forward and has adjusted the height to sit erect without having to lean forward or change the neck angle (right) – this is an ergonomically appropriate posture. (Adapted from http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/issues/2012/january-2012/of-ophthalmologists-aching-backs)[15] Posture for operating microscope. Microscope ocular and objective are at a straight line, with the ophthalmologist having to lean forward constantly (left) – this is a wrong posture. If the ocular is moved 20°–25° toward the surgeon and the operating chair height is appropriately adjusted, the surgeon can sit straight (right) – this is an ergonomically appropriate posture. (Adapted from http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/issues/2012/january-2012/of-ophthalmologists-aching-backs)[15] About 50 years ago, Laufman was duly concerned that “only a few surgeons have made the surgical environment their main research interest.”[1718] The situation has not changed much. Our efforts to create an ergonomic clinic and operating room environment will require paradigm changes in the traditional concepts of design to have customization built into standardized hospital architecture. Instrument manufacturers should be provided with user-driven information to optimize ergonomics and provide adjustability. A greater involvement in this transformation by the ophthalmologists themselves may help accomplish the twin goals of personal well-being and increased efficiency while maintaining patient and staff safety.
  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of ergonomic interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorders of dentists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ester Haver Droeze; Hans Jonsson
Journal:  Work       Date:  2005

2.  What's wrong with our operating rooms?

Authors:  H Laufman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Mechanical exposure of ophthalmic surgeons: a quantitative ergonomic evaluation of indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Conrad Shaw; Rabia Bourkiza; Louisa Wickham; Ian Mccarthy; Cordelia Mckechnie
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders in ophthalmologists.

Authors:  Kenneth C Dhimitri; Gerald McGwin; Sandre F McNeal; Paul Lee; Patti Ann Morse; Mark Patterson; Fleming D Wertz; Jeffrey L Marx
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Frequency and assortment of self-report occupational complaints among Iranian ophthalmologists: a preliminary survey.

Authors:  Hormoz Chams; Seyed Farzad Mohammadi; Alireza Moayyeri
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-12-13

6.  A survey study of occupational pain and injury in ophthalmic plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sivak-Callcott; Sebastian R Diaz; Alan M Ducatman; Charles L Rosen; Ashish D Nimbarte; Judith A Sedgeman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

7.  National survey of back & neck pain amongst consultant ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Jonathan N Hyer; Richard M Lee; Haziq R Chowdhury; Henry B Smith; Anish Dhital; Mona Khandwala
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Neck and upper back pain among eye care professionals.

Authors:  M Al-Marwani Al-Juhani; R Khandekar; M Al-Harby; A Al-Hassan; D P Edward
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.611

9.  Is ophthalmology becoming a pain in the neck?

Authors:  Sundaram Natarajan; Akshay Gopinathan Nair
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Back pain in ophthalmology: National survey of Indian ophthalmologists.

Authors:  Ramesh Venkatesh; Sumit Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  4 in total

1.  External ophthalmic videography - Tools and techniques.

Authors:  Santosh G Honavar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Doctor, heal thyself: Addressing the shorter life expectancy of doctors in India.

Authors:  Suresh K Pandey; Vidushi Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Use of the heads-up NGENUITY 3D Visualization System for vitreoretinal surgery: a retrospective evaluation of outcomes in a French tertiary center.

Authors:  Pierre Kantor; Frédéric Matonti; Fanny Varenne; Vanessa Sentis; Véronique Pagot-Mathis; Pierre Fournié; Vincent Soler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinical Performance and Surgeon Acceptability of a New Dual Mode Phacoemulsification System.

Authors:  Gabriel Quesada; Daniel H Chang; Kevin L Waltz; Andrew A Kao; Rodrigo Quesada; Ying Wang; Leilei Ji; Dari Parizadeh; Luis Atiles
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.