Literature DB >> 28819715

Automatic detection of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion on PMCT using deep learning - a feasibility study.

Lars C Ebert1, Jakob Heimer2, Wolf Schweitzer2, Till Sieberth2, Anja Leipner2, Michael Thali2, Garyfalia Ampanozi2.   

Abstract

Post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) can be used as a triage tool to better identify cases with a possibly non-natural cause of death, especially when high caseloads make it impossible to perform autopsies on all cases. Substantial data can be generated by modern medical scanners, especially in a forensic setting where the entire body is documented at high resolution. A solution for the resulting issues could be the use of deep learning techniques for automatic analysis of radiological images. In this article, we wanted to test the feasibility of such methods for forensic imaging by hypothesizing that deep learning methods can detect and segment a hemopericardium in PMCT. For deep learning image analysis software, we used the ViDi Suite 2.0. We retrospectively selected 28 cases with, and 24 cases without, hemopericardium. Based on these data, we trained two separate deep learning networks. The first one classified images into hemopericardium/not hemopericardium, and the second one segmented the blood content. We randomly selected 50% of the data for training and 50% for validation. This process was repeated 20 times. The best performing classification network classified all cases of hemopericardium from the validation images correctly with only a few false positives. The best performing segmentation network would tend to underestimate the amount of blood in the pericardium, which is the case for most networks. This is the first study that shows that deep learning has potential for automated image analysis of radiological images in forensic medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Forensic imaging; Hemopericardium; Neural networks; PMCT

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28819715     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-017-9906-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  21 in total

1.  How reliable are Hounsfield-unit measurements in forensic radiology?

Authors:  Thomas D Ruder; Yannick Thali; Sebastian T Schindera; Simon A Dalla Torre; Wolf-Dieter Zech; Michael J Thali; Steffen Ross; Gary M Hatch
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs.

Authors:  Andreas Christe; Patricia Flach; Steffen Ross; Danny Spendlove; Stephan Bolliger; Peter Vock; Michael J Thali
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.376

3.  Role of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in the assessment of the challenging diagnosis of pericardial tamponade as cause of death in cases with hemopericardium.

Authors:  Laura Filograna; Patrick Laberke; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols.

Authors:  Patricia M Flach; Dominic Gascho; Wolf Schweitzer; Thomas D Ruder; Nicole Berger; Steffen G Ross; Michael J Thali; Garyfalia Ampanozi
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Multi-Instance Deep Learning: Discover Discriminative Local Anatomies for Bodypart Recognition.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Shinagawa; Dimitris N Metaxas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Classification of CT brain images based on deep learning networks.

Authors:  Xiaohong W Gao; Rui Hui; Zengmin Tian
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Rib fractures at postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) validated against the autopsy.

Authors:  Claudia Schulze; Hanno Hoppe; Wolf Schweitzer; Nicole Schwendener; Silke Grabherr; Christian Jackowski
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole day.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Jeremy M Wolfe; Ramin Khorasani; S Ted Treves; David J Getty; Francine L Jacobson; Michael L Steigner; John J Pan; Arkadiusz Sitek; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Iatrogenic pericardial effusion and tamponade in the percutaneous intracardiac intervention era.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Rick Nishimura; Rebecca Fountain; Zoltan G Turi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automated Detection, Segmentation, and Classification of Pericardial Effusions on Chest CT Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Adrian Jonathan Wilder-Smith; Shan Yang; Thomas Weikert; Jens Bremerich; Philip Haaf; Martin Segeroth; Lars C Ebert; Alexander Sauter; Raphael Sexauer
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 2.  Findings from machine learning in clinical medical imaging applications - Lessons for translation to the forensic setting.

Authors:  Carlos A Peña-Solórzano; David W Albrecht; Richard B Bassed; Michael D Burke; Matthew R Dimmock
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Potential use of deep learning techniques for postmortem imaging.

Authors:  Akos Dobay; Jonathan Ford; Summer Decker; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Sabine Franckenberg; Raffael Affolter; Till Sieberth; Lars C Ebert
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.