Literature DB >> 28819585

Costs for mitochondrial medicine will remain high as long as mitochondrial disorders are misdiagnosed.

Josef Finsterer1, Sinda Zarrouk-Mahjoub2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Epidemiology; Mitochondrial; Multiorgan; Respiratory chain

Year:  2017        PMID: 28819585      PMCID: PMC5548331          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep        ISSN: 2214-4269


× No keyword cloud information.
Letter to the Editor We read with interest the article by McCormack et al. about frequency and costs of hospitalisations of mitochondrial disorder (MID) patients in California [1]. There are several reasons why the figures provided are underestimations. First, quite a number of MIDs go undetected or are misinterpreted as another disease. Particularly, patients with multiorgan disease are frequently in fact mitochondrial multiorgan disorder syndromes (MIMODSs) [2]. As soon as the cause of multisystem disease remains obscure, a MID should be suspected and considered as a differential diagnosis. Since work-up of suspected MID is time-consuming, logistically demanding, cost-intensive, and often associated with inconclusive or negative results, it is frequently not initiated at all, why many of these patients go undetected for years or forever. Second, ICD codes do not cover the entire spectrum of MIDs. For example, MIRAS, LBSL, or PCH may be missed. Even ICD10 does not cover all specific and nonspecific MIMODS. Third, coding of diagnoses is often insufficiently effectuated. Sometimes, only major diagnoses are encoded. Sometimes no ICD codes are allocated at all. Fourth, a number of congenital MIDs may remain undiagnosed because patients decease during the first few days or months of life. During this short period it is often impossible to complete a comprehensive diagnostic work-up. Often these patients do not undergo autopsy. Fifth, MIDs are often insufficiently diagnosed. According to various classification criteria, MIDs may be diagnosed as possible, probable, or definite [3]. Often MIDs are only diagnosed upon histochemical or biochemical investigations, without the inclusion of functional or genetic studies. Accordingly, we do not agree with the figure 1:4300 for the prevalence of MIDs [1]. Nonspecific MIDs are regarded much more frequent occurring with a prevalence of 1:400 [4]. Overall, the costs in mitochondrial medicine will remain high if patients are misdiagnosed and thus mistreated. The longer a misdiagnosis is maintained, the more costs incur.
  4 in total

1.  Hospitalizations for mitochondrial disease across the lifespan in the U.S.

Authors:  Shana E McCormack; Rui Xiao; Todd J Kilbaugh; Michael Karlsson; Rebecca D Ganetzky; Zarazuela Zolkipli Cunningham; Amy Goldstein; Marni J Falk; Scott M Damrauer
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 2.  Genetic Counselling for Maternally Inherited Mitochondrial Disorders.

Authors:  Joanna Poulton; Josef Finsterer; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Diagnostic criteria for respiratory chain disorders in adults and children.

Authors:  F P Bernier; A Boneh; X Dennett; C W Chow; M A Cleary; D R Thorburn
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Multiorgan disorder syndrome (MODS) in an octagenarian suggests mitochondrial disorder.

Authors:  Josef Finsterer; Adam Bastovansky
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.