| Literature DB >> 28819527 |
Latifa Merzougui1, Nedia Marwen2, Tarek Barhoumi1, Afef Ben Ltaeifa2, Hajer Hannachi1, Roukaya Jaballah1, Ridha Fatnassi2.
Abstract
Partograph is an essential tool in routine delivery room practices. It is a written reflection of the quality of mother and child health management during delivery and in the immediate post-partum period. Our study aims to assess compliance rate of partograph use within our maternity ward and to propose areas for improvement of its quality. We conducted a retrospective clinical audit of 400 patients? medical records who gave birth on the labour ward at University of Kairouan from 1 January to 31 December 2014. The reference guidelines used were those from the French Health High Authority (2006) containing 29 criteria divided into 3 categories (PARTOten, PARTOobs, PARTOeve). The overall compliance rate (OCR) of partograph use in our audit was 55.9%. With regard to the first area, such as « La tenue du partogramme » (partograph use, PARTOten) the overall compliance rate was 88, 9%. With regard to the second area, such as « la traçabilité du déroulement du travail » (track labor progression, PARTOobs) the overall compliance rate was 51, 4%. With regard to the third area, such as « la traçabilité des actes, des évènements et des traitements au cours du travail » (the tracing of actions, events and treatments during labor, PARTOeve) the overall compliance rate was 27.4%. Our study has helped identify several areas for improvement. The ultimate goal of this clinical audit was the improvement of professional practices. Therefore, we implemented an action plan (training, awareness raising?) followed by a review aimed to verify the continuity of the corrective actions.Entities:
Keywords: Partograph; clinical audit; evaluation of professional practices; obstetrics
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28819527 PMCID: PMC5554623 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.106.10620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1Échantillonnage
Figure 2Taux de conformité par critère du domaine I (PARTOten) « la présentation du partogramme », Maternité kairouan 2014
Figure 3Taux de conformité par critère du domaine II ( PARTOobs) « la traçabilité du déroulement du travail »,Maternité kairouan 2014
Figure 4Taux de conformité par critère du domaine III (PARTOeve) « la traçabilité des actes, des événements et des traitements au cours du travail», Maternité kairouan 2014
Conformité de la tenue du partogramme : PARTOten (revue de la littérature)
| Etudes Internationales | Etudes Nationales | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auteur | HAS 1ère évaluation | Malibeau Claire | Catherine Boivent et | Fabien Doreus et | Marion Mottier et | Soraya Friha et | Anne.G Provost et | Anis Sghaier et | Manel Limem et |
| |
| Pays | France | France Nantes | France Nantes | France | France Angers | France Argenteuil | Portugal Ayres de Menezes | Tunisie Beni Khedache | Tunisie Sousse |
| |
| Maternité | Maternité | ||||||||||
| Référence | 6 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 7 | - | |
| Année | 2006 | 2007 | 2009 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Taille de l'échantillon | 81 | 122 | 97 | 90 | 272 | 109 | 40 | 120 | 400 | 400 | |
| 68,00 | 99,00 | 99,00 | 97,00 | 74,00 | 94,00 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 99,30 | 68,00 | |
| 88,50 | 88,00 | 100 | 87,00 | 67,00 | 98,00 | 93,00 | 100 | 93,30 | 99,80 | ||
| 89,20 | 74,00 | 64,00 | 16,00 | 13,00 | 88,00 | 99,00 | 17,50 | 68,30 | 84,30 | ||
| 83,90 | 99,00 | - | 84,00 | 82,00 | 87,00 | 03,00 | 85,00 | - | 99,30 | ||
| 78,50 | 98,00 | 100 | 97,00 | 17,00 | 58,00 | 94,00 | 97,50 | 98,30 | 100 | ||
| 76,70 | - | - | 62,00 | 27,00 | - | 97,00 | 15,00 | - | 82,04 | ||
Maternité de Saint-Vincent-de –Paul au sein du groupe hospitalier Cochin-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul
Maternité de Port- Royal au sein du groupe hospitalier Cochin-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul
Conformité de la traçabilité des actes, des évènements et des traitements au cours du travail : PARTOeve (revue de la littérature)
| Auteur | HAS 1èreévaluation | Malibeau Claire. | Catherine Boivent et | Fabien Doreus et al | Marion Mottier et | Soraya Friha et | Anne.G Provost et |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Référence | 6 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 9 | 10 |
| 37,40 | - | 25,00 | 1,00 | - | 55,00 | 95,00 | |
| 41,00 | 5,00 | 58,00 | 47,00 | 94,00 | 46,00 | 7,50 | |
| 88,20 | - | - | 75,00 | 94,00 | 100 | - | |
| 23,00 | 64,00 | 42,00 | 11,00 | 37,00 | 52,00 | 40,00 | |
| 42,80 | - | - | 21,00 | - | 63,00 | 15,00 | |
| 62,40 | - | - | - | - | 14,00 | 37,50 | |
| 53,50 | 48,00 | 62,00 | 85,00 | 79,00 | 7,00 | 2,50 | |
| 60,60 | - | - | - | 60,00 | 98,00 | 0,00 | |
| 39,20 | - | 52,00 | 33,00 | - | 18,00 | - | |
| 0,00 | 90,00 | ||||||
| 55,30 | 0,00 | 33,00 | 36,00 | 1,00 | 15,00 | ||
| 42,80 | 43,00 | 70,00 | 0,00 | - | 83,00 | 87,50 |
Conformité de La traçabilité de déroulement du travail : PARTOobs (revue de la littérature)
| Auteur | HAS 1èreévaluation | MalibeauClaire. | CatherineBoivent et | FabienDoreus et | MarionMottier et | SorayaFriha et | Anne.GProvost et |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Référence | 6 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 9 | 10 |
| 55,30 | 74,00 | 17,00 | 100 | 49,00 | 95,00 | 85,00 | |
| 68,80 | - | - | 68,00 | - | 84,00 | 37,50 | |
| 58,80 | - | 97,00 | 22,00 | 84,00 | 57,00 | 40,00 | |
| 68,00 | 91,00 | 94,00 | 47,00 | 95,00 | 94,00 | 62,50 | |
| 78,40 | - | 98,00 | 37,00 | - | 09,00 | 32,50 | |
| 51,70 | 43,00 | 68,00 | 09,00 | 54,00 | 97,00 | 47,50 | |
| 96,30 | - | 45,00 | 99,00 | 99,00 | 87,50 | ||
| 59,70 | - | - | 96,00 | 25,00 | 99,00 | 42,50 | |
| 47,00 | 30,00 | 72,00 | 23,00 | 78,00 | 92,00 | 82,50 | |
| 55,30 | 100 | 63,00 | 50,00 | 65,00 | 97,00 | 15,00 | |
| 90,10 | 88,00 | 75,00 | 38,00 | 13,00 | 46,00 | 60,00 | |
| 76,70 | - | - | 87,00 | - | 98,00 | 72,5, |