Literature DB >> 28819323

Excessive body fat linked to blunted somatosensory cortex response to general reward in adolescents.

J F Navas1,2, A Barrós-Loscertales3, V Costumero-Ramos3, J Verdejo-Román2, R Vilar-López2,4, A Verdejo-García4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The brain reward system is key to understanding adolescent obesity in the current obesogenic environment, rich in highly appetising stimuli, to which adolescents are particularly sensitive. We aimed to examine the association between body fat levels and brain reward system responsivity to general (monetary) rewards in male and female adolescents.
METHODS: Sixty-eight adolescents (34 females; mean age (s.d.)= 16.56 (1.35)) were measured for body fat levels with bioelectric impedance, and underwent a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task. The MID task reliably elicits brain activations associated with two fundamental aspects of reward processing: anticipation and feedback. We conducted regression analyses to examine the association between body fat and brain reward system responsivity during reward anticipation and feedback, while controlling for sex, age and socioeconomic status. We also analysed the moderating impact of sex on the relationship between fat levels and brain responsivity measures. Brain imaging analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons, with a cluster-defining threshold of P<0.001, and minimum cluster size of 38 contiguous voxels.
RESULTS: Higher body fat levels were associated with lower activation of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the supramarginal gyrus during reward feedback after controlling for key sociodemographic variables. Although we did not find significant associations between body fat and brain activations during reward anticipation, S1/supramarginal gyrus activation during feedback was linked to increased negative prediction error, that is, less reward than expected, in illustrative post hoc analyses. Sex did not significantly moderate the association between body fat and brain activation in the MID task.
CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents, higher adiposity is linked to hypo-responsivity of somatosensory regions during general (monetary) reward feedback. Findings suggest that adolescents with excess weight have blunted activation in somatosensory regions involved in reward feedback learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28819323     DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2017.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  41 in total

1.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.

Authors:  B Knutson; G W Fong; C M Adams; J L Varner; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 2.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Guillaume Sescousse; Xavier Caldú; Bàrbara Segura; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Adolescent neural response to reward is related to participant sex and task motivation.

Authors:  Gabriela Alarcón; Anita Cservenka; Bonnie J Nagel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Brain reward system's alterations in response to food and monetary stimuli in overweight and obese individuals.

Authors:  Juan Verdejo-Román; Raquel Vilar-López; Juan F Navas; Carles Soriano-Mas; Antonio Verdejo-García
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Beyond the body mass index: tracking body composition in the pathogenesis of obesity and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  M J Müller; M Lagerpusch; J Enderle; B Schautz; M Heller; A Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 7.  Oral somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Lieke de Boer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Spoor; Cara Bohon; Marga G Veldhuizen; Dana M Small
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Reward facilitates tactile judgments and modulates hemodynamic responses in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Dopamine reward prediction error coding.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.986

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Alexander S Weigard; Karthikeyan Ganesan; Hyesue Jang; Andrew Jahn; Edward D Huntley; Daniel P Keating
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  What Difference Does it Make? Risk-Taking Behavior in Obesity after a Loss is Associated with Decreased Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity.

Authors:  Trevor Steward; Asier Juaneda-Seguí; Gemma Mestre-Bach; Ignacio Martínez-Zalacaín; Nuria Vilarrasa; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Jose A Fernández-Formoso; Misericordia Veciana de Las Heras; Nuria Custal; Nuria Virgili; Rafael Lopez-Urdiales; Amador García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela; José M Menchón; Carles Soriano-Mas; Fernando Fernandez-Aranda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.