Nicola Cherry1, Whitney Haynes1. 1. Affiliation: Division of Preventive Medicine (Cherry, Haynes), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wildfire engulfed Fort McMurray, Alberta on May 3, 2016, leading to a total evacuation. Access to 2 active cohorts allowed us to rapidly assess health effects in those evacuated. METHODS: People working in Fort McMurray who had been recruited before the fire for 2 occupational health cohort studies completed a questionnaire (online or via telephone) 3-26 weeks after evacuation. The questionnaire asked about respiratory and mental health and experiences since the fire. RESULTS: Of the 129 participants, 109 were in the Fort McMurray area on May 3. Thirty-seven (33.9%) of the participants who were in Fort McMurray on May 3 reported a health condition, including respiratory symptoms (n = 17) and mental ill health (n = 17), immediately after the fire. At follow-up, a mean of 102 days after the fire, 11 participants (10.1%) reported a fire-related health condition, including mental ill health (n = 8) and respiratory symptoms (n = 2). There was no difference before and after the fire in use of alcohol, cigarettes, recreational drugs or medication. One in 4 participants (32 [24.6%]) had not worked since the fire, and fewer than half (58 [44.6%]) had returned to Fort McMurray. Of the 90 participants evacuated, 15 (16.7%) had scores indicative of moderate or severe anxiety or depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those evacuated had significantly higher mean anxiety (p = 0.01) and depression (p = 0.04) scores than those not evacuated. Regression modelling showed that anxiety scores were higher for women, with longer time since the fire and with evacuation to a motel. Depression scores were higher for women and with financial loss because of lack of work. INTERPRETATION: Although evacuation was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores, persisting ill health was not widespread at early follow-up after the fire. Although these results are encouraging, these "healthy worker" results cannot be generalized to all evacuees. Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Wildfire engulfed Fort McMurray, Alberta on May 3, 2016, leading to a total evacuation. Access to 2 active cohorts allowed us to rapidly assess health effects in those evacuated. METHODS:People working in Fort McMurray who had been recruited before the fire for 2 occupational health cohort studies completed a questionnaire (online or via telephone) 3-26 weeks after evacuation. The questionnaire asked about respiratory and mental health and experiences since the fire. RESULTS: Of the 129 participants, 109 were in the Fort McMurray area on May 3. Thirty-seven (33.9%) of the participants who were in Fort McMurray on May 3 reported a health condition, including respiratory symptoms (n = 17) and mental ill health (n = 17), immediately after the fire. At follow-up, a mean of 102 days after the fire, 11 participants (10.1%) reported a fire-related health condition, including mental ill health (n = 8) and respiratory symptoms (n = 2). There was no difference before and after the fire in use of alcohol, cigarettes, recreational drugs or medication. One in 4 participants (32 [24.6%]) had not worked since the fire, and fewer than half (58 [44.6%]) had returned to Fort McMurray. Of the 90 participants evacuated, 15 (16.7%) had scores indicative of moderate or severe anxiety or depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those evacuated had significantly higher mean anxiety (p = 0.01) and depression (p = 0.04) scores than those not evacuated. Regression modelling showed that anxiety scores were higher for women, with longer time since the fire and with evacuation to a motel. Depression scores were higher for women and with financial loss because of lack of work. INTERPRETATION: Although evacuation was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores, persisting ill health was not widespread at early follow-up after the fire. Although these results are encouraging, these "healthy worker" results cannot be generalized to all evacuees. Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: H Colin Gallagher; John Richardson; David Forbes; Louise Harms; Lisa Gibbs; Nathan Alkemade; Colin MacDougall; Elizabeth Waters; Karen Block; Dean Lusher; Elyse Baker; Richard A Bryant Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2016-01-07
Authors: Lennart Reifels; Bridget Bassilios; Matthew J Spittal; Kylie King; Justine Fletcher; Jane Pirkis Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: David Vlahov; Sandro Galea; Heidi Resnick; Jennifer Ahern; Joseph A Boscarino; Michael Bucuvalas; Joel Gold; Dean Kilpatrick Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Martin F Sherman; Robyn R Gershon; Halley E M Riley; Qi Zhi; Lori A Magda; Mark Peyrot Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Colleen E Reid; Michael Brauer; Fay H Johnston; Michael Jerrett; John R Balmes; Catherine T Elliott Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 9.031