Literature DB >> 28818990

Clinical Use and Utility of Amyloid Imaging.

Henryk Barthel1, Osama Sabri2.   

Abstract

Currently, 3 amyloid PET tracers are approved and commercially available for clinical use. They allow for the accurate in vivo detection of amyloid plaques, one hallmark of Alzheimer disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on the clinical use and utility of amyloid imaging. Appropriate use criteria for the clinical application of amyloid imaging are established, and most currently available data point to their validity. Visual amyloid image analysis is highly standardized. Disclosure of amyloid imaging results is desired by many cognitively impaired subjects and seems to be safe once appropriate education is delivered to the disclosing clinicians. Regarding clinical utility, increasing evidence points to a change in diagnosis via amyloid imaging in about 30% of cases, to an increase in diagnostic confidence in about 60% of cases, to a change in patient management in about 60% of cases, and specifically to a change in medication in about 40% of cases. Also, amyloid imaging results seem to have a relevant impact on caregivers. Further, initial simulation studies point to a potential positive effect on patient outcome and to cost effectiveness of amyloid imaging. These features, however, will require confirmation in prospective clinical trials. More work is also required to determine the clinical utility of amyloid imaging specifically in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and in comparison with or in conjunction with other Alzheimer disease biomarkers. In summary, the clinical use of amyloid imaging is being studied, and the currently available data point to a relevant clinical utility of this imaging technique. Ongoing research will determine whether this accurate and noninvasive approach to amyloid plaque load detection will translate into a benefit to cognitively impaired subjects.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; amyloid; dementia; imaging; utility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818990     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  32 in total

1.  Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Changes in Diagnosis and Patient Treatment in an Unselected Memory Clinic Cohort: The ABIDE Project.

Authors:  Arno de Wilde; Wiesje M van der Flier; Wiesje Pelkmans; Femke Bouwman; Jurre Verwer; Colin Groot; Marieke M van Buchem; Marissa Zwan; Rik Ossenkoppele; Maqsood Yaqub; Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Frederik Barkhof; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Andrew Stephens; Erik van Lier; Geert Jan Biessels; Bart N van Berckel; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Regional times to equilibria and their impact on semi-quantification of [18F]AV-1451 uptake.

Authors:  Kerstin Heurling; Ruben Smith; Olof T Strandberg; Martin Schain; Tomas Ohlsson; Oskar Hansson; Michael Schöll
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Relationship between F-18 florbetapir uptake in occipital lobe and neurocognitive performance in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Tanyaluck Thientunyakit; Thonnapong Thongpraparn; Chakmeedaj Sethanandha; Takahiro Yamada; Yuichi Kimura; Weerasak Muangpaisan; Kazunari Ishii
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Assessing FDG-PET diagnostic accuracy studies to develop recommendations for clinical use in dementia.

Authors:  Marina Boccardi; Cristina Festari; Daniele Altomare; Federica Gandolfo; Stefania Orini; Flavio Nobili; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  PET and SPECT imaging of the brain: a review on the current status of nuclear medicine in Japan.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kaneta
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Consideration of Sex Differences in the Measurement and Interpretation of Alzheimer Disease-Related Biofluid-Based Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Imaging of Preclinical, Sporadic, and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Rachel F Buckley
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Incremental value of amyloid-PET versus CSF in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Matteo Cotta Ramusino; Valentina Garibotto; Ruggero Bacchin; Daniele Altomare; Alessandra Dodich; Frederic Assal; Aline Mendes; Alfredo Costa; Michele Tinazzi; Silvia D Morbelli; Matteo Bauckneht; Agnese Picco; Massimo E Dottorini; Cristina Tranfaglia; Lucia Farotti; Nicola Salvadori; Davide Moretti; Giordano Savelli; Anna Tarallo; Flavio Nobili; Maura Parapini; Carlo Cavaliere; Elena Salvatore; Marco Salvatore; Marina Boccardi; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Visual interpretation of [18F]Florbetaben PET supported by deep learning-based estimation of amyloid burden.

Authors:  Ji-Young Kim; Dongkyu Oh; Kiyoung Sung; Hongyoon Choi; Jin Chul Paeng; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Young Lee; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comparison of [11C]UCB-J and [18F]FDG PET in Alzheimer's disease: A tracer kinetic modeling study.

Authors:  Ming-Kai Chen; Adam P Mecca; Mika Naganawa; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Takuya Toyonaga; Jayanta Mondal; Sjoerd J Finnema; Shu-Fei Lin; Ryan S O'Dell; Julia W McDonald; Hannah R Michalak; Brent Vander Wyk; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Yiyun Huang; Amy Ft Arnsten; Christopher H van Dyck; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.