Sha Li1, Man Zheng2, Wenzhong Wu3, Jie Guo1, Fangbin Ji1, Zhen Zheng4. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China. Electronic address: man_zheng@sina.com. 3. Department of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China. 4. School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), delivered 24hours before surgery, on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postoperative pain in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 40 patients scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to the usual care (UC) group and the EA group (n = 20 each). Both groups received the routine treatment consisting of intravenous dexamethasone (5mg) after induction of anesthesia and intravenous tropisetron (5mg) before the end of the operation. The patients in the EA group received EA at bilateral neiguan (PC6) and zusanli (ST36) within 24hours prior to the surgery. The incidence and severity of PONV and pain were recorded at 6hours, 12hours, and 24hours after the operation. Time to first flatus passage was also recorded. Bonferroni-corrected independent sample t-tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the first six hours after surgery, 15% and 20% of the patients experienced postoperative nausea in the EA and the UC groups, respectively. The incidences of postoperative vomiting were 5% for the EA group and 20% for the UC group. PONV reduced to zero over 12hours in both groups and there was no statistically significant difference in PONV between the two groups at any time point. The EA group rated their postoperative pain statistically significantly lower than the UC group did at six hours postoperative (EA: 1.9 ± .8; UC: 2.9 ± .9, P = .001). The two groups did not differ in pain at 12 and 24hours. The EA group had a shorter time to pass first flatus than the UC group did (EA: 20.3hours ± 6.1; UC: 26.4 ± 5.2, P = .002). The common EA-related adverse effects were minor, and did not require medical attention. The patients tolerated the EA treatment well. CONCLUSION: It is feasible and safe to deliver one-session EA treatment within 24hours preoperatively to preempt postoperative pain. One-session preoperative EA may also accelerate motility of the gastrointestinal track. Properly powered studies are needed to further test the effectiveness of preoperative EA on PONV.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of preoperative electroacupuncture (EA), delivered 24hours before surgery, on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postoperative pain in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 40 patients scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to the usual care (UC) group and the EA group (n = 20 each). Both groups received the routine treatment consisting of intravenous dexamethasone (5mg) after induction of anesthesia and intravenous tropisetron (5mg) before the end of the operation. The patients in the EA group received EA at bilateral neiguan (PC6) and zusanli (ST36) within 24hours prior to the surgery. The incidence and severity of PONV and pain were recorded at 6hours, 12hours, and 24hours after the operation. Time to first flatus passage was also recorded. Bonferroni-corrected independent sample t-tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the first six hours after surgery, 15% and 20% of the patients experienced postoperative nausea in the EA and the UC groups, respectively. The incidences of postoperative vomiting were 5% for the EA group and 20% for the UC group. PONV reduced to zero over 12hours in both groups and there was no statistically significant difference in PONV between the two groups at any time point. The EA group rated their postoperative pain statistically significantly lower than the UC group did at six hours postoperative (EA: 1.9 ± .8; UC: 2.9 ± .9, P = .001). The two groups did not differ in pain at 12 and 24hours. The EA group had a shorter time to pass first flatus than the UC group did (EA: 20.3hours ± 6.1; UC: 26.4 ± 5.2, P = .002). The common EA-related adverse effects were minor, and did not require medical attention. The patients tolerated the EA treatment well. CONCLUSION: It is feasible and safe to deliver one-session EA treatment within 24hours preoperatively to preempt postoperative pain. One-session preoperative EA may also accelerate motility of the gastrointestinal track. Properly powered studies are needed to further test the effectiveness of preoperative EA on PONV.