Literature DB >> 28818609

Multicenter Comparison of 22C3 PharmDx (Agilent) and SP263 (Ventana) Assays to Test PD-L1 Expression for NSCLC Patients to Be Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Antonio Marchetti1, Massimo Barberis2, Renato Franco3, Graziano De Luca4, Maria Vittoria Pace4, Stefania Staibano5, Marco Volante6, Fiamma Buttitta4, Elena Guerini-Rocco2, Luisella Righi6, Tommaso D'antuono4, Giorgio V Scagliotti6, Carmine Pinto7, Gaetano De Rosa5, Mauro Papotti6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Among the several agents targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway, pembrolizumab is currently the only one approved for the treatment of patients with NSCLC in association with a companion diagnostic assay, the anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) 22C3 PharmDx (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using the Dako Autostainer (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). However, the Dako platform is not present in each pathology department, and this technical limitation is a major problem for the diffusion of the PD-L1 IHC predictive test for pembrolizumab.
METHODS: The Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology in an independent, multicenter study compared the in vitro diagnostics PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx test (Agilent) on the Dako Autostainer and the in vitro diagnostics Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) test on the Ventana BenchMark platform (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). Using serial sections from tissue microarrays, 100 lung adenocarcinomas were locally stained and scored in four centers with the same antibody batches.
RESULTS: A high analytical correlation (more than 90% at the lower 95% confidence interval [CI] value) between PD-L1 expression levels obtained with the 22C3 and SP263 assays was observed. At the proposed clinically relevant cutoffs (≥50% and ≥1%), the overall concordances between 22C3 and SP263 data were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.91), respectively. The lower agreement between data obtained with the 22C3 and SP263 clones at the cutoff of 1% or higher was mainly related to the lower (about 80%) interrater agreement at this cutoff with each clone.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a high correlation between PD-L1 IHC expression data obtained with the Agilent PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and the Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) tests in NSCLC and suggest that the two assays could be utilized interchangeably as an aid to select patients for first-line and second-line treatment with pembrolizumab and potentially with other anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.
Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunohistochemistry; Immunotherapy; Non–small cell lung cancer; PD-1; PD-L1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818609     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  32 in total

1.  Why anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy is so effective? Another piece in the puzzle.

Authors:  Antonio Marchetti; Alessia Di Lorito; Fiamma Buttitta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Reproducibility of PD-L1 assessment in non-small cell lung cancer-know your limits but never stop trying to exceed them.

Authors:  Marius Ilie; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Are the Promises of Long-Term Benefit Finally Met?

Authors:  Diego L Kaen; Nicolas Minatta; Alessandro Russo; Umberto Malapelle; Diego de Miguel-Pérez; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Targeting immune checkpoints in gynecologic cancer: updates & perspectives for pathologists.

Authors:  Anne M Mills; Tim N Bullock; Kari L Ring
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Comprehensive Comparison of 22C3 and SP263 PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Routine Clinical and Conditioned Archives.

Authors:  Sue Youn Kim; Tae-Eun Kim; Chan Kwon Park; Hyoung-Kyu Yoon; Young Jo Sa; Hyo Rim Kim; In Sook Woo; Tae-Jung Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  PD-L1 expression testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Teixidó; Noelia Vilariño; Roxana Reyes; Noemí Reguart
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 7.  Update on Immunohistochemistry for the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Selected highlights of the 2019 Pulmonary Pathology Society Biennial Meeting: PD-L1 test harmonization studies.

Authors:  Sylvie Lantuejoul; Francesca Damiola; Julien Adam
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06

9.  Comparability of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bregje M Koomen; Sushil K Badrising; Michel M van den Heuvel; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  Current Clinical Progress of PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy and Potential Combination Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Xin Li; Ju-Min Huang; Ze-Bo Jiang; Run-Ze Li; Ao Sun; Elaine Lai-Han Leung; Pei-Yu Yan
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.