Literature DB >> 28818536

Glansectomy as Primary Management of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An International Study Collaboration.

Dominic H Tang1, Sylvia Yan2, Sarah R Ottenhof3, Désirée Draeger4, Adam S Baumgarten5, Juan Chipollini5, Chris Protzel4, Yao Zhu6, Ding-Wei Ye6, Oliver W Hakenberg4, Simon Horenblas3, Nicholas A Watkin2, Philippe E Spiess5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the recurrence and survival outcomes of glansectomy in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 410 patients across 5 international tertiary referral centers between 1999 and 2016. All patients had tumors involving the glans penis and underwent glansectomy as primary treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate survival and recurrence. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range [IQR] 29-56).
RESULTS: The median age was 64 years (IQR 53-72). Median tumor size was 2.2 cm (IQR 1.5-3.0). A total of 240 patients (58.5%) had pT2 disease, whereas only 43 patients (10.5%) had pT3 or pT4 disease. The majority of the cohort had poorly differentiated tumors (43.7%). Most recurrences were local at 7.6% (31 patients). Only 14 patients (3.4%) had regional recurrence and 9 patients (2.2%) had distant recurrence. When stratified by pathologic stage, tumors that were pT2 or higher were (P < .001) and were more likely to be poorly differentiated (P < .001). There were no differences in recurrence location among pathologic stages (P = .15). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival were 98%, 94%, and 78%, respectively. There were no differences in overall survival when stratified by stage (P = .67).
CONCLUSION: Glansectomy is an oncologically safe treatment modality for squamous cell carcinoma of the glans in appropriately selected invasive tumors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818536     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakalis; Riccardo Campi; Lenka Barreto; Herney Garcia Perdomo; Isabella Greco; Łukasz Zapala; Mithun Kailavasan; Tiago Antunes-Lopes; Jack David Marcus; Kenneth Manzie; John Osborne; Benjamin Ayres; Luc M F Moonen; Andrea Necchi; Juanita Crook; Pedro Oliveira; Lance C Pagliaro; Chris Protzel; Arie S Parnham; Maarten Albersen; Curtis A Pettaway; Philippe E Spiess; Scott T Tagawa; R Bryan Rumble; Oscar R Brouwer
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 2.  [Local treatment of penile cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Walther Hakenberg; Desiree Louise Dräger; Andreas Erbersdobler; Carsten Maik Naumann; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Chris Protzel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.