Literature DB >> 28818387

Plant response to biotic stress: Is there a common epigenetic response during plant-pathogenic and symbiotic interactions?

Prince Zogli1, Marc Libault2.   

Abstract

Plants constantly interact with pathogenic and symbiotic microorganisms. Recent studies have revealed several regulatory mechanisms controlling these interactions. Among them, the plant defense system is activated not only in response to pathogenic, but also in response to symbiotic microbes. Interestingly, shortly after symbiotic microbial recognition, the plant defense system is suppressed to promote plant infection by symbionts. Research studies have demonstrated the influence of the plant epigenome in modulating both pathogenic and symbiotic plant-microbe interactions, thereby influencing plant survival, adaptation and evolution of the plant response to microbial infections. It is however unclear if plant pathogenic and symbiotic responses share similar epigenomic profiles or if epigenomic changes differentially regulate plant-microbe symbiosis and pathogenesis. In this mini-review, we provide an update of the current knowledge of epigenomic control on plant immune responses and symbiosis, with a special attention being paid to knowledge gap and potential strategies to fill-in the missing links.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epigenome; Plant defense; Single cell; Symbiosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818387     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  8 in total

1.  Gene Silencing of Argonaute5 Negatively Affects the Establishment of the Legume-Rhizobia Symbiosis.

Authors:  María Del Rocio Reyero-Saavedra; Zhenzhen Qiao; María Del Socorro Sánchez-Correa; M Enrique Díaz-Pineda; Jose L Reyes; Alejandra A Covarrubias; Marc Libault; Oswaldo Valdés-López
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Roles of Non-Coding RNA in Sugarcane-Microbe Interaction.

Authors:  Flávia Thiebaut; Cristian A Rojas; Clícia Grativol; Edmundo P da R Calixto; Mariana R Motta; Helkin G F Ballesteros; Barbara Peixoto; Berenice N S de Lima; Lucas M Vieira; Maria Emilia Walter; Elvismary M de Armas; Júlio O P Entenza; Sergio Lifschitz; Laurent Farinelli; Adriana S Hemerly; Paulo C G Ferreira
Journal:  Noncoding RNA       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 3.  The role of plant epigenetics in biotic interactions.

Authors:  Conchita Alonso; Daniela Ramos-Cruz; Claude Becker
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Survival Mechanisms to Selective Pressures and Implications.

Authors:  Songbo Xie; Min Liu
Journal:  Open Life Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 0.938

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Minimizing Cadmium Accumulation in Wheat.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Zhengguo Li
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 6.  Moving Beyond DNA Sequence to Improve Plant Stress Responses.

Authors:  Faisal Saeed; Usman Khalid Chaudhry; Allah Bakhsh; Ali Raza; Yasir Saeed; Abhishek Bohra; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Transcriptome reprogramming, epigenetic modifications and alternative splicing orchestrate the tomato root response to the beneficial fungus Trichoderma harzianum.

Authors:  Monica De Palma; Maria Salzano; Nunzio D'Agostino; Marina Tucci; Clizia Villano; Riccardo Aversano; Matteo Lorito; Michelina Ruocco; Teresa Docimo; Anna Lisa Piccinelli
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.793

Review 8.  Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses and Rhizobacterial Biostimulants: Metabolomics and Epigenetics Perspectives.

Authors:  Motseoa M Lephatsi; Vanessa Meyer; Lizelle A Piater; Ian A Dubery; Fidele Tugizimana
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-07-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.