M Videau1, K Rghioui2, B Mottet3, A Sainfort4, I Lefort4. 1. Service de pharmacie, centre hospitalier d'Ardèche-Nord, BP 119, rue du Bon-Pasteur, 07103 Annonay cedex, France. Electronic address: videau.manon@gmail.com. 2. Service biomédical, centre hospitalier d'Ardèche-Nord, BP 119, rue du Bon-Pasteur, 07103 Annonay cedex, France. 3. Service d'hygiène hospitalière, centre hospitalier d'Ardèche-Nord, BP 119, rue du Bon-Pasteur, 07103 Annonay cedex, France. 4. Service de pharmacie, centre hospitalier d'Ardèche-Nord, BP 119, rue du Bon-Pasteur, 07103 Annonay cedex, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To present a minimization-cost analysis to compare reusable and single-use fiberscopes in a French health institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The amortization cost assessment has been achieved over a period of five years, and took into account the acquisition and maintenance costs, as well as the costs related to disinfection of reusable fiberscopes. The cost of single-use fiberscopes was calculated according to its acquisition and elimination costs. Finally, we compared the costs of single-use vs. reusable use during nights, weekends and days off to estimate the additional cost of the referencing of single-use fiberscopes for theses specific periods. RESULTS: The total cost of reusable fiberscopes was 62,511 € including VAT over 5 years whereas the cost of single-use fiberscope was 79,200 € including VAT over 5 years. The total cost of single-use fiberscopes if utilized during nights, weekends and days off was estimated to 19,800 € including VAT over 5 years, with an estimated activity at 15 intubations per year. Conversely, the cost of the utilization of reusable fiberscopes during nights, weekends and days off was estimate to 13,075 € including VAT over 5 years. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the utilization costs of single use and reusable fiberscopes are very close. But because of the benefits of single-use fiberscopes and according to current recommendations, we consider to acquire single-use fiberscope especially for emergencies such as difficult tracheal intubation and for restrictive periods (nights, weekends and day off).
OBJECTIVE: To present a minimization-cost analysis to compare reusable and single-use fiberscopes in a French health institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The amortization cost assessment has been achieved over a period of five years, and took into account the acquisition and maintenance costs, as well as the costs related to disinfection of reusable fiberscopes. The cost of single-use fiberscopes was calculated according to its acquisition and elimination costs. Finally, we compared the costs of single-use vs. reusable use during nights, weekends and days off to estimate the additional cost of the referencing of single-use fiberscopes for theses specific periods. RESULTS: The total cost of reusable fiberscopes was 62,511 € including VAT over 5 years whereas the cost of single-use fiberscope was 79,200 € including VAT over 5 years. The total cost of single-use fiberscopes if utilized during nights, weekends and days off was estimated to 19,800 € including VAT over 5 years, with an estimated activity at 15 intubations per year. Conversely, the cost of the utilization of reusable fiberscopes during nights, weekends and days off was estimate to 13,075 € including VAT over 5 years. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the utilization costs of single use and reusable fiberscopes are very close. But because of the benefits of single-use fiberscopes and according to current recommendations, we consider to acquire single-use fiberscope especially for emergencies such as difficult tracheal intubation and for restrictive periods (nights, weekends and day off).