Literature DB >> 28818315

Screening for familial cancer risk: Focus on breast cancer.

Christine Rousset-Jablonski1, Anne Gompel2.   

Abstract

A breast or an ovarian cancer occurring at a young age and/or in a family where other cases preexist suggests that those patients should be candidates for screening for mutations. Despite decades of medical research, less than 30% of cases with a suggestive personal and/or family history of hereditary breast cancer have an identified causative gene mutation. The vast majority of these cases are due to a mutation in one of the highly penetrant breast cancer genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, TP53, CDH1, and STK11) and various guidelines direct the management of these patients. A minority of cases are due to mutations in moderate-penetrance genes (PALB2, ATM, BRIP1, and CHEK2). A small number of low-penetrance alleles have been identified using advanced genetic testing methods. While these may contribute to risk in a polygenic fashion, this is likely to be relevant to a minority of cases and their identification should not be considered routine practice. Mutation testing currently requires a high index of suspicion for a specific contributing etiology, but next-generation sequencing may improve the identification of such genes and the clinical management of these cases. Where no genetic susceptibility is identified, lifetime breast cancer risk can be calculated with standard tools. Breast cancer risk management then depends on the calculated lifetime risk. The psychological consequences of such screening for mutation carriers and non-carriers are discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Breast cancer risk; Oncogenetic; Panel; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818315     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: the risky status quo and new concepts of predictive medicine.

Authors:  Jiri Polivka; Irem Altun; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.543

2.  Evidence for penetrance in patients without a family history of disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heather Turner; Leigh Jackson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Interplay between BRCA1 and GADD45A and Its Potential for Nucleotide Excision Repair in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Sylwia Pietrasik; Gabriela Zajac; Jan Morawiec; Miroslaw Soszynski; Michal Fila; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Risk factors assessment of breast cancer among Iraqi Kurdish women: Case-control study.

Authors:  Hawar Hasan Ali Ghalib; Dawan Hiwa Ali; Sherko Abdullah Molah Karim; Mohammed Ibrahim Mohialdeen Gubari; Saman Ahmed Mohammed; Diyar Hassan Marif; Hawsar Mohammed Othman
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-12-10

5.  Enhance PARPi Application beyond BRCA-Mutant Breast Cancer (BC): Facts Are Facts.

Authors:  Tania Di Raimo; Francesco Angelini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Bioinformatics analysis of the expression of HOXC13 and its role in the prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Changyou Li; Junwei Cui; Li Zou; Lizhang Zhu; Wei Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  A Novel Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutation of BRCA2 Gene Associated With Familial Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors in Two Siblings.

Authors:  Yeran Yang; Jiwei Chen; Hong Qin; Yaqiong Jin; Li Zhang; Shen Yang; Huanmin Wang; Libing Fu; Enyu Hong; Yongbo Yu; Jie Lu; Yan Chang; Xin Ni; Min Xu; Tieliu Shi; Yongli Guo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.