Joshua G Travers1, Fadia A Kamal2, Iñigo Valiente-Alandi1, Michelle L Nieman3, Michelle A Sargent1, John N Lorenz3, Jeffery D Molkentin4, Burns C Blaxall5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; The Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 3. Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: Burns.Blaxall@cchmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac fibroblasts are a critical cell population responsible for myocardial extracellular matrix homeostasis. Upon injury or pathological stimulation, these cells transform to an activated myofibroblast state and play a fundamental role in myocardial fibrosis and remodeling. Chronic sympathetic overstimulation, a hallmark of heart failure (HF), induces pathological signaling through G protein βγ (Gβγ) subunits and their interaction with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the hypothesis that Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition and/or ablation after myocardial injury would attenuate pathological myofibroblast activation and cardiac remodeling. METHODS: The therapeutic potential of small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition, alone or in combination with activated fibroblast- or myocyte-specific GRK2 ablation-each initiated after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury-was investigated to evaluate the possible salutary effects on post-I/R fibroblast activation, pathological remodeling, and cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: Small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-injury was cardioprotective in the I/R model of chronic HF, including preservation of cardiac contractility and a reduction in cardiac fibrotic remodeling. Systemic small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-I/R in cardiomyocyte-restricted GRK2 ablated mice (also post-I/R) still demonstrated significant cardioprotection, which suggested a potential protective role beyond the cardiomyocyte. Inducible ablation of GRK2 in activated fibroblasts (i.e., myofibroblasts) post-I/R injury demonstrated significant functional cardioprotection with reduced myofibroblast transformation and fibrosis. Systemic small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-I/R provided little to no further protection in mice with ablation of GRK2 in activated fibroblasts alone. Finally, Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition significantly attenuated activation characteristics of failing human cardiac fibroblasts isolated from end-stage HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested consideration of a paradigm shift in the understanding of the therapeutic role of Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition in treating HF and the potential therapeutic role for Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition in limiting pathological myofibroblast activation, interstitial fibrosis, and HF progression.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac fibroblasts are a critical cell population responsible for myocardial extracellular matrix homeostasis. Upon injury or pathological stimulation, these cells transform to an activated myofibroblast state and play a fundamental role in myocardial fibrosis and remodeling. Chronic sympathetic overstimulation, a hallmark of heart failure (HF), induces pathological signaling through G protein βγ (Gβγ) subunits and their interaction with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the hypothesis that Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition and/or ablation after myocardial injury would attenuate pathological myofibroblast activation and cardiac remodeling. METHODS: The therapeutic potential of small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition, alone or in combination with activated fibroblast- or myocyte-specific GRK2 ablation-each initiated after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury-was investigated to evaluate the possible salutary effects on post-I/R fibroblast activation, pathological remodeling, and cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: Small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-injury was cardioprotective in the I/R model of chronic HF, including preservation of cardiac contractility and a reduction in cardiac fibrotic remodeling. Systemic small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-I/R in cardiomyocyte-restricted GRK2 ablated mice (also post-I/R) still demonstrated significant cardioprotection, which suggested a potential protective role beyond the cardiomyocyte. Inducible ablation of GRK2 in activated fibroblasts (i.e., myofibroblasts) post-I/R injury demonstrated significant functional cardioprotection with reduced myofibroblast transformation and fibrosis. Systemic small molecule Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition initiated 1 week post-I/R provided little to no further protection in mice with ablation of GRK2 in activated fibroblasts alone. Finally, Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition significantly attenuated activation characteristics of failing human cardiac fibroblasts isolated from end-stage HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested consideration of a paradigm shift in the understanding of the therapeutic role of Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition in treating HF and the potential therapeutic role for Gβγ-GRK2 inhibition in limiting pathological myofibroblast activation, interstitial fibrosis, and HF progression.
Authors: Scot J Matkovich; Abhinav Diwan; Justin L Klanke; Daniel J Hammer; Yehia Marreez; Amy M Odley; Eric W Brunskill; Walter J Koch; Robert J Schwartz; Gerald W Dorn Journal: Circ Res Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Neil A Turner; Karen E Porter; William H T Smith; Hazel L White; Stephen G Ball; Anthony J Balmforth Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Philip W Raake; Leif E Vinge; Erhe Gao; Matthieu Boucher; Giuseppe Rengo; Xiongwen Chen; Brent R DeGeorge; Scot Matkovich; Steven R Houser; Patrick Most; Andrea D Eckhart; Gerald W Dorn; Walter J Koch Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Fadia A Kamal; Deanne M Mickelsen; Katherine M Wegman; Joshua G Travers; Jacob Moalem; Stephen R Hammes; Alan V Smrcka; Burns C Blaxall Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Qian Fan; Mai Chen; Lin Zuo; Xiying Shang; Maggie Z Huang; Michele Ciccarelli; Philip Raake; Henriette Brinks; Kurt J Chuprun; Gerald W Dorn; Walter J Koch; Erhe Gao Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ioanna Andreadou; Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes; Yvan Devaux; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Stefan Frantz; Tomasz Guzik; Elisa A Liehn; Clarissa P C Gomes; Rainer Schulz; Derek J Hausenloy Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Cristina Murga; Alba C Arcones; Marta Cruces-Sande; Ana M Briones; Mercedes Salaices; Federico Mayor Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 5.810