Literature DB >> 28818148

Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians on Providing Volunteer Care for In-Flight Medical Events.

Eric Chatfield, William F Bond, Bradley McCay, Claude Thibeault, Paulo M Alves, Marc Squillante, Joshua Timpe, Courtney J Cook, Raymond E Bertino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Airline carriers have equipment, procedures, and protocols in place to handle in-flight medical events (IFMEs). Community physicians may be asked for aid during IFMEs. Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians on Providing Volunteer Care for In-Flight Medical Events surveyed self-assessed awareness and knowledge, perceived barriers, and suggestions for improving responses to IFMEs.
METHODS: We composed a survey regarding clinicians' self-assessed understanding of in-flight resources, procedures, flight environmental issues, and Good Samaritan protections. The survey was distributed primarily via electronic mail to medical staff list serves to a total of approximately 1300 physicians representing 2 health networks that serve urban, suburban, and rural areas in both inpatient and outpatient settings.
RESULTS: Total number of responses was 418. Physician response rate was 29.2% (379/1300). In 3% (39/1300), the responder either failed to indicate their background or was another type of health care professional (e.g., dentist, medical student, physician assistant). Of the physicians, 37.5% (142/379) were primary care and 42% (177/418) of responders reported at least one experience of being asked to volunteer. When asked how well they understand the protocols with which medical events are handled, 64% (262/412) responded "not at all" and 23% (94/412) reported "a little" knowledge. Only 56% (223/397) answered that 75% or more of U.S. flights have ground medical support available. There were 73% (298/411) who believed airlines were required to have medical supplies, but 54% (222/410) reported no knowledge of supplies available. A total of 69% (279/403) believed or were sure that the U.S. has a Good Samaritan law that applies to IFMEs. DISCUSSION: Many physicians lack basic knowledge about IFMEs. Responders may assist more effectively if better informed about protocols and the availability of ground medical support. Education and timely information support are recommended.Chatfield E, Bond WF, McCay B, Thibeault C, Alves PM, Squillante M, Timpe J, Cook CJ, Bertino RE. Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians on Providing Volunteer Care for In-Flight Medical Events. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(9):876-879.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818148     DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.4865.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform        ISSN: 2375-6314            Impact factor:   1.053


  3 in total

1.  In-flight cardiac arrest and in-flight cardiopulmonary resuscitation during commercial air travel: consensus statement and supplementary treatment guideline from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine-comment.

Authors:  David Powell; Martin Hudson
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Training Family Medicine Residents to Prevent and Respond to In-flight Emergencies.

Authors:  Victoria Udezi; Philip Day; Nora Gimpel
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nur-Ain Nadir; Courtney J Cook; Raymond E Bertino; Marc D Squillante; Cameron Taylor; David Dragoo; Gregory S Podolej; Jessica D Svendsen; Jessica L Fish; Jeremy S McGarvey; William F Bond
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.