| Literature DB >> 28817960 |
Shady Elmasry1, Shihab Asfour1, Francesco Travascio1.
Abstract
When treating thoracolumbar burst fractures (BF), short-segment posterior fixation (SSPF) represents a less invasive alternative to the traditional long-segment posterior fixation (LSPF) approach. However, hardware failure and loss of sagittal alignment have been reported in patients treated with SSPF. Including pedicle screws at the fracture level in SSPF constructs has been proposed to improve stiffness and reliability of the construct. Accordingly, the biomechanical performance of the proposed construct was compared to LSPF via a computational analysis. Pedicle screws at fracture level improved the performance of the short-segment construct. However, LSPF still represent a biomechanically superior option for treating thoracolumbar BF.Entities:
Keywords: Spine burst fracture; computational biomechanics; finite element analysis; intradiscal pressure; pedicle screw
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28817960 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1366995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin ISSN: 1025-5842 Impact factor: 1.763