Literature DB >> 28817780

US internists' awareness and use of overtreatment guidelines: a national survey.

Kira L Ryskina1, Eric S Holmboe, Elizabeth Bernabeo, Rachel M Werner, Judy A Shea, Judith A Long.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess physician views and perceived adoption of overtreatment guidelines and measure whether adoption of these guidelines influenced the recommendation of a targeted service. STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey mailed from July 2014 to January 2015 to 902 internists who completed residency between 2003 and 2013, randomly selected from the American Medical Association Masterfile.
METHODS: Poisson regression was used to model the rate of recommending a targeted service included in the guidelines, based on the level of guideline adoption.
RESULTS: A total of 456 physicians responded (51% response rate). Most expressed familiarity with overtreatment guidelines (88.5%), a comfort level with discussing these guidelines with patients (79.9%), and described overtreatment guidelines as a useful tool in their practice (81.6%). Physicians in the highest tertile of guideline adoption reported double-digit rates of recommending antibiotics for sinusitis (29.7%), mammogram at end of life (16.5%), and electrocardiogram testing for asymptomatic patients (11.0%). Physicians in the bottom tertile of guideline adoption reported lower rates of recommending x rays (-12.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -19.4% to -4.5%; P = .002), magnetic resonance imaging for lower back pain (-4.8%; 95% CI, -8.1% to -1.5%; P = .004), and cardiac testing for asymptomatic patients (-10.2%; 95% CI, -18.9% to -1.5%; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: US internal medicine physicians who completed residency between 2003 and 2013 reported high levels of adoption of overtreatment guidelines. Physicians who reported the highest levels of guideline adoption reported recommending services targeted by these guidelines in their practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28817780      PMCID: PMC5823021     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  25 in total

1.  Addressing requests by patients for nonbeneficial interventions.

Authors:  Allan S Brett; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Harnessing the Right Combination of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Change Physician Behavior.

Authors:  Timothy J Judson; Kevin G Volpp; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Physicians' responses to resource constraints.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Sara Chandros Hull; Gordon DuVal; Marion Danis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services.

Authors:  Nancy E Morden; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Scott R Berry; Eric Nadler; Chaim M Bell; Michael A Kozminski; Jennifer A Palmer; William K Evans; Elizabeth L Strevel; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The impact of consumer-directed health plans and patient socioeconomic status on physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Giridhar Mallya; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Matthew K Wynia; Robert D Sheeler; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Katherine M James; Jason S Egginton; Mark Liebow; Samia Hurst; Marion Danis; Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Peter Glassman; Sharad Jain; Joyce Hansen; Maureen Spell; Martin Lee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physician Experiences With High Value Care in Internal Medicine Residency: Mixed-Methods Study of 2003-2013 Residency Graduates.

Authors:  Kira L Ryskina; Eric S Holmboe; Judy A Shea; Esther Kim; Judith A Long
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 2.  Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Hanna Augustsson; Sara Ingvarsson; Per Nilsen; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Irene Muli; Jessica Dervish; Henna Hasson
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.