Literature DB >> 28817742

Minimum Abutment Height to Eliminate Bone Loss: Influence of Implant Neck Design and Platform Switching.

Sergio Spinato, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Fabio Bernardello, Davide Zaffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective study quantitatively analyzed the minimum prosthetic abutment height to eliminate bone loss after 4.7-mm-diameter implant placement in maxillary bone and how grafting techniques can affect the marginal bone loss in implants placed in maxillary areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different implant types with a similar neck design were singularly placed in two groups of patients: the test group, with platform-switched implants, and the control group, with conventional (non-platform-switched) implants. Patients requiring bone augmentation underwent unilateral sinus augmentation using a transcrestal technique with mineralized xenograft. Radiographs were taken immediately after implant placement, after delivery of the prosthetic restoration, and after 12 months of loading.
RESULTS: The average mesial and distal marginal bone loss of the control group (25 patients) was significantly more than twice that of the test group (26 patients), while their average abutment height was similar. Linear regression analysis highlighted a statistically significant inverse relationship between marginal bone loss and abutment height in both groups; however, the intercept of the regression line, both mesially and distally, was 50% lower for the test group than for the control group. The marginal bone loss was annulled with an abutment height of 2.5 mm for the test group and 3.0 mm for the control group. No statistically significant differences were found regarding marginal bone loss of implants placed in native maxillary bone compared with those placed in the grafted areas.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the shorter the abutment height, the greater the marginal bone loss in cement-retained prostheses. Abutment height showed a greater influence in platform-switched than in non-platform-switched implants on the limitation of marginal bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28817742     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Alba Carrasco-García; José-Ramón Corcuera-Flores; Javier Silvestre-Rangil; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Guillermo Machuca-Portillo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Evaluation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues behavior in screw-retained crowns by the biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): Ambispective longitudinal analytical study.

Authors:  Victoria Mandillo-Alonso; Rocío Cascos-Sánchez; José-Luis Antonaya-Martín; Martín Laguna-Martos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-01-01

3.  Simulated Performance of a Xenohybrid Bone Graft (SmartBone®) in the Treatment of Acetabular Prosthetic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlo Francesco Grottoli; Alberto Cingolani; Fabio Zambon; Riccardo Ferracini; Tomaso Villa; Giuseppe Perale
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-11-22

4.  Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra; Loreto Monsalve-Guil; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Javier Gil; Jose Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments with or without a Titanium Base: An In Vitro Study for Tapered Conical Connection Implants.

Authors:  Shota Watanabe; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Yasufumi Yamanishi; Takashi Matsuoka; Shoichi Ishigaki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants.

Authors:  Nasreen Hamudi; Eitan Barnea; Evgeny Weinberg; Amir Laviv; Eitan Mijiritsky; Shlomo Matalon; Liat Chaushu; Roni Kolerman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hoori Aslroosta; Solmaz Akbari; Nima Naddafpour; Seyed Taha Adnaninia; Afshin Khorsand; Niusha Namadmalian Esfahani
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Immediate Loading of Implant-Supported Single Crowns after Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Teresa Lombardi; Domenico Baldi; Calogero Bugea; Antonio Rapani; Giuseppe Perinetti; Angelo Itri; David Carpita; Guido Audenino; Giuseppe Bianco; Simone Verardi; Stefano Carossa; Gianmario Schierano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Antonio Fons-Font; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss with a Convergent Transmucosal Morphology: Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  María Costa Castillo; Martín Laguna Martos; Rocío Marco Pitarch; Marina García Selva; Silvia Del Cid Rodríguez; Carla Fons-Badal; Rubén Agustín Panadero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.